Suppr超能文献

与住院医师至主治医师放射学报告差异相关的患者回忆:风险差异的预测因素

Patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies: predictive factors for risky discrepancies.

作者信息

Son A Yeon, Hong Gil-Sun, Lee Choong Wook, Lee Ju Hee, Chung Won Jung, Lee Jung Bok

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Health Screening and Promotion Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2022 Jun 4;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01233-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for risky discrepancies in the emergency department (ED) by analyzing patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies (RRDs).

RESULTS

This retrospective study analyzed 759 RRDs in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging and their outcomes from 2013 to 2021. After excluding 73 patients lost to follow-up, we included 686 records in the final analysis. Risky discrepancies were defined as RRDs resulting in (1) inpatient management (hospitalization) and (2) adverse outcomes (delayed operations, 30-day in-hospital mortality, or intensive care unit admission). Predictors of risky discrepancies were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The overall RRD rate was 0.4% (759 of 171,419). Of 686 eligible patients, 21.4% (147 of 686) received inpatient management, and 6.0% (41 of 686) experienced adverse outcomes. RRDs with neurological diseases were associated with the highest ED revisit rate (79.4%, 81 of 102) but not with risky RRDs. Predictive factors of inpatient management were critical finding (odds ratio [OR], 5.60; p < 0.001), CT examination (OR, 3.93; p = 0.01), digestive diseases (OR, 2.54; p < 0.001), and late finalized report (OR, 1.65; p = 0.02). Digestive diseases (OR, 6.14; p = 0.006) were identified as the only significant predictor of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Risky RRDs were associated with several factors, including CT examination, digestive diseases, and late finalized reports, as well as critical image findings. This knowledge could aid in determining the priority of discrepancies for the appropriate management of RRDs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过分析与住院医师和主治医生之间的放射学报告差异(RRD)相关的患者召回情况,确定急诊科(ED)中存在风险差异的预测因素。

结果

这项回顾性研究分析了2013年至2021年期间计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像中的759例RRD及其结果。在排除73例失访患者后,我们将686份记录纳入最终分析。有风险的差异被定义为导致(1)住院治疗(住院)和(2)不良后果(手术延迟、30天住院死亡率或重症监护病房入院)的RRD。使用多变量逻辑回归分析评估有风险差异的预测因素。总体RRD率为0.4%(171419例中的759例)。在686例符合条件的患者中,21.4%(686例中的147例)接受了住院治疗,6.0%(686例中的41例)出现了不良后果。患有神经系统疾病的RRD与最高的ED复诊率相关(79.4%,102例中的81例),但与有风险的RRD无关。住院治疗的预测因素包括关键发现(比值比[OR],5.60;p < 0.001)、CT检查(OR,3.93;p = 0.01)、消化系统疾病(OR,2.54;p < 0.001)和报告最终定稿较晚(OR,1.65;p = 0.02)。消化系统疾病(OR,6.14;p = 0.006)被确定为不良后果的唯一显著预测因素。

结论

有风险的RRD与多个因素相关,包括CT检查、消化系统疾病、报告最终定稿较晚以及关键图像发现。这些知识有助于确定差异的优先级,以便对RRD进行适当管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e076/9167364/ad8c96da21a9/13244_2022_1233_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Etiology and disposition associated with radiology discrepancies on emergency department patients.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2015-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
Overnight attending radiologist coverage decreases imaging-related emergency department recalls by at least 90.
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Jun;28(3):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01894-y. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Discrepancies in interpretation of night-time emergency computed tomography scans by radiology residents.
Acta Radiol Open. 2018 Oct 22;7(10):2058460118807234. doi: 10.1177/2058460118807234. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Acad Radiol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.017. Epub 2009 May 30.
8
The Clinical Impact of Resident-attending Discrepancies in On-call Radiology Reporting: A Retrospective Assessment.
Acad Radiol. 2018 Jun;25(6):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.016. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents.
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;25(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.04.008.

本文引用的文献

3
Overnight attending radiologist coverage decreases imaging-related emergency department recalls by at least 90.
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Jun;28(3):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01894-y. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Radiograph Interpretation Discrepancies in a Community Hospital Emergency Department.
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):626-632. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.1.41375. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验