• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与急诊 72 小时内非计划性复诊和转入重症监护病房相关的与医师相关的因素。

Physician-related factors associated with unscheduled revisits to the emergency department and admission to the intensive care unit within 72 h.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, No. 1, Yi-Da Road, Jiao-Su Village, Yan-Chao District, Kaohsiung, 82445, Taiwan.

In-Service Master Programs of Healthcare Administration, Department of Healthcare Administration, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, 82445, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70021-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-70021-1
PMID:32747730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400515/
Abstract

Investigation of physician-related causes of unscheduled revisits to the emergency department (ED) within 72 h with subsequent admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is an important parameter of emergency care quality. Between 2012 and 2017, medical records of all adult patients who visited the ED and returned within 72 h with subsequent ICU admission were retrospectively reviewed by three experienced emergency physicians. Study parameters were categorized into "input" (Patient characteristics), "throughput" (Time spent on first ED visit and seniority of emergency physicians, and "output" (Charlson Comorbidity Index). Of the 147 patients reviewed for the causes of ICU admission, 35 were physician-related (23.8%). Eight belonged to more urgent categories, whereas the majority (n = 27) were less urgent. Patients who spent less time on their first ED visits before discharge (< 2 h) were significantly associated with physician-related causes of ICU admission, whereas there was no significant difference in other "input," "throughput," and "output" parameters between the "physician-related" and "non-physician-related" groups. Short initial management time was associated with physician-related causes of ICU admission in patients with initial less urgent presentations, highlighting failure of the conventional triage system to identify potentially life-threatening conditions and possibility of misjudgement because of the patients' apparently minor initial presentations.

摘要

调查在 72 小时内因非计划性再次就诊急诊科(ED)并随后转入重症监护病房(ICU)的与医生相关的原因,是急诊医疗质量的一个重要参数。在 2012 年至 2017 年期间,由三名经验丰富的急诊医生对所有在 ED 就诊并在 72 小时内返回且随后入住 ICU 的成年患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。研究参数分为“输入”(患者特征)、“处理”(首次 ED 就诊花费的时间和急诊医生的资历)和“输出”(Charlson 合并症指数)。在审查的 147 例 ICU 入院原因中,有 35 例与医生相关(23.8%)。其中 8 例属于更紧急的类别,而大多数(n=27)则不太紧急。在出院前首次 ED 就诊时间较短(<2 小时)的患者与 ICU 医生相关的入院原因显著相关,而在“输入”、“处理”和“输出”参数方面,“医生相关”和“非医生相关”两组之间没有显著差异。在初始表现不太紧急的患者中,初始管理时间较短与 ICU 医生相关的入院原因有关,这突出表明传统分诊系统未能识别潜在危及生命的情况,并且可能因为患者最初表现轻微而出现误诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3382/7400515/7d0035c2bcda/41598_2020_70021_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3382/7400515/7d0035c2bcda/41598_2020_70021_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3382/7400515/7d0035c2bcda/41598_2020_70021_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Physician-related factors associated with unscheduled revisits to the emergency department and admission to the intensive care unit within 72 h.与急诊 72 小时内非计划性复诊和转入重症监护病房相关的与医师相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70021-1.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with emergency department revisits within 72 hours and subsequent admission to the intensive care unit.72小时内急诊科复诊并随后入住重症监护病房患者的特征及结局
Tzu Chi Med J. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
3
Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: consequences for triage.非计划性急诊科复诊:分诊后果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):33-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12052.
4
Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department with ICU admission: A trigger tool for diagnostic error.非计划性返回急诊部并收入 ICU:诊断错误的触发工具。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1584-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158430. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
6
ICU admission following an unscheduled return visit to the pediatric emergency department within 72 hours.72 小时内儿科急诊非计划性复诊后转入 ICU。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1644-y.
7
Critical care by emergency physicians in American and English hospitals.美国和英国医院中急诊医生提供的重症监护。
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;10(3):145-54. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.3.145.
8
Hospitalist bed management effecting throughput from the emergency department to the intensive care unit.医院病床管理对从急诊到重症监护病房的吞吐量的影响。
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Are trends in billing for high-intensity emergency care explained by changes in services provided in the emergency department? An observational study among US Medicare beneficiaries.急诊科提供服务的变化能否解释高强度急诊护理计费的趋势?一项针对美国医疗保险受益人的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 30;8(1):e019357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019357.
10
The risk factors of the 72-h unscheduled return visit admission to emergency department in adults below 50 years old.50 岁以下成年人急诊 72 小时内非计划性再次就诊的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;28(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01317-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comments on "Characteristics of patients who return to the emergency department after an observation-unit assessment".关于“观察单元评估后返回急诊科的患者特征”的评论
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;12(2):183-184. doi: 10.15441/ceem.25.004. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.通过床旁超声提高复诊急诊患者的诊断准确性:急诊科质量管理的一项工具
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Mar 18;18:1549-1556. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S507075. eCollection 2025.
3
Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分诊系统在急诊护理中的应用效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471.
2
Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department-Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model.使用加速失效时间模型预测急诊科出院患者的住院时间
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0165756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165756. eCollection 2017.
3
Prognosis of patients in a medical intensive care unit.
基于机器学习算法的高危急诊科复诊预测:概念验证研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 22;31(1):e100859. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100859.
4
High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.
5
Patient recalls associated with resident-to-attending radiology report discrepancies: predictive factors for risky discrepancies.与住院医师至主治医师放射学报告差异相关的患者回忆:风险差异的预测因素
Insights Imaging. 2022 Jun 4;13(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01233-4.
6
Impact of diagnostic errors on adverse outcomes: learning from emergency department revisits with repeat CT or MRI.诊断错误对不良结局的影响:从因重复CT或MRI检查而再次就诊于急诊科的案例中吸取教训。
Insights Imaging. 2021 Nov 3;12(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01108-0.
医学重症监护病房患者的预后
North Clin Istanb. 2015 Dec 31;2(3):189-195. doi: 10.14744/nci.2015.79188. eCollection 2015.
4
Factors Affecting Medical Service Quality.影响医疗服务质量的因素。
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Feb;43(2):210-20.
5
Evaluation of emergency department performance - a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures.急诊部门绩效评估 - 推荐的绩效和医疗质量措施的系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Aug 9;21:62. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-62.