Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1167-1177. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01829-9. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has improved the treatment of certain solid tumors, but effective regimens remain elusive for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD-1) and/or sotigalimab (sotiga; CD40 agonistic antibody) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) in patients with first-line metastatic PDAC ( NCT03214250 ). In 105 patients analyzed for efficacy, the primary endpoint of 1-year overall survival (OS) was met for nivo/chemo (57.7%, P = 0.006 compared to historical 1-year OS of 35%, n = 34) but was not met for sotiga/chemo (48.1%, P = 0.062, n = 36) or sotiga/nivo/chemo (41.3%, P = 0.223, n = 35). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response and safety. Treatment-related adverse event rates were similar across arms. Multi-omic circulating and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct immune signatures associated with survival for nivo/chemo and sotiga/chemo. Survival after nivo/chemo correlated with a less suppressive tumor microenvironment and higher numbers of activated, antigen-experienced circulating T cells at baseline. Survival after sotiga/chemo correlated with greater intratumoral CD4 T cell infiltration and circulating differentiated CD4 T cells and antigen-presenting cells. A patient subset benefitting from sotiga/nivo/chemo was not identified. Collectively, these analyses suggest potential treatment-specific correlates of efficacy and may enable biomarker-selected patient populations in subsequent PDAC chemoimmunotherapy trials.
化疗联合免疫疗法改善了某些实体肿瘤的治疗效果,但对于胰腺导管腺癌 (PDAC) 仍然缺乏有效的治疗方案。我们进行了一项随机 2 期试验,评估纳武单抗(nivo;抗 PD-1)和/或 sotigalimab(sotiga;CD40 激动性抗体)联合吉西他滨/纳布紫杉醇(化疗)在一线转移性 PDAC 患者中的疗效(NCT03214250)。在对疗效进行分析的 105 名患者中,nivo/chemo 的主要终点 1 年总生存期(OS)达到(57.7%,P = 0.006 与历史上 1 年 OS 相比为 35%,n = 34),但 sotiga/chemo 未达到(48.1%,P = 0.062,n = 36)或 sotiga/nivo/chemo(41.3%,P = 0.223,n = 35)。次要终点为无进展生存期、客观缓解率、疾病控制率、缓解持续时间和安全性。各治疗组的治疗相关不良事件发生率相似。循环和肿瘤多组学生物标志物分析确定了与 nivo/chemo 和 sotiga/chemo 生存相关的独特免疫特征。nivo/chemo 后生存与肿瘤微环境抑制作用较弱以及基线时循环中激活的、抗原经验丰富的 T 细胞数量较多相关。sotiga/chemo 后生存与肿瘤内 CD4 T 细胞浸润和循环分化的 CD4 T 细胞和抗原呈递细胞较多相关。未确定从 sotiga/nivo/chemo 中获益的患者亚组。总的来说,这些分析表明了疗效的潜在治疗特异性相关性,可能为随后的 PDAC 化疗免疫治疗试验提供基于生物标志物的选择患者群体。