Cabanac M, Ferber C
Appetite. 1987 Feb;8(1):15-28. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(87)80023-5.
A matrix of 25 gustatory stimuli combined five sucrose concentrations (0.15 to 2.35 mole/l) with five temperatures (10 to 50 degrees C) or sournesses (pH 1.8 to 5.7). On four different days at the same time of day ten healthy young men served as subjects. Sweet pleasure/displeasure vs. temperature pleasure/displeasure was studied in four subjects and sweet pleasure/displeasure vs. sourness pleasure/displeasure in six subjects. Throughout the first session the 25 stimuli were presented for 5 s each and the subject gave a magnitude estimate of his pleasure or displeasure in response to one dimension of the matrix (e.g. sweetness) regardless of the other. Similarly, throughout the second session, the same stimuli were presented and the subject rated his pleasure or displeasure in response to the second dimension of the matrix (e.g. sourness or temperature) regardless of the first. For the third session however, the subject himself was invited to mix samples, this to allow a behavioural choice in one dimension of the matrix the other being imposed (e.g. he could mix sucrose and water ad libitum for five imposed temperatures). For the last session the subject could adjust the previously imposed dimension, the other previously adjustable dimension being now imposed (e.g. he could modify temperature for five imposed sucrose concentrations). The results of the first two sessions showed that pleasure/displeasure resulted from a two-dimensional combination of the taste modalities offered. The results of the last two sessions showed that the subjects tended to maximize their sensory pleasure. The operant choices coincided with the ratings obtained in the first two sessions. Whether a dimension of the matrix was imposed or operantly adjustable made no difference on the results; the subjects tended to maximize sensory pleasure in the imposed dimension as well as in the adjustable dimension. The subjects therefore maximized their pleasure in the two-dimensional space offered.
由25种味觉刺激组成的矩阵将5种蔗糖浓度(0.15至2.35摩尔/升)与5种温度(10至50摄氏度)或酸度(pH值1.8至5.7)进行了组合。在一天中的同一时间,在四个不同的日子里,十名健康的年轻男性作为受试者。对四名受试者研究了甜味愉悦/不愉悦与温度愉悦/不愉悦的关系,对六名受试者研究了甜味愉悦/不愉悦与酸味愉悦/不愉悦的关系。在整个第一阶段,每次呈现25种刺激,持续5秒,受试者针对矩阵的一个维度(例如甜度)给出其愉悦或不愉悦程度的量级估计,而不考虑另一个维度。同样,在整个第二阶段,呈现相同的刺激,受试者针对矩阵的第二个维度(例如酸度或温度)给出其愉悦或不愉悦程度的评级,而不考虑第一个维度。然而,在第三阶段,邀请受试者自己混合样品,以便在矩阵的一个维度上进行行为选择,另一个维度是固定的(例如,他可以随意混合蔗糖和水,针对五个固定的温度)。在最后一个阶段,受试者可以调整之前固定的维度,而之前可调整的维度现在变为固定的(例如,他可以针对五个固定的蔗糖浓度调整温度)。前两个阶段的结果表明,愉悦/不愉悦是由所提供的味觉模式的二维组合产生的。后两个阶段的结果表明,受试者倾向于使他们的感官愉悦最大化。操作性选择与前两个阶段获得的评级一致。矩阵的一个维度是固定的还是可操作性调整的,对结果没有影响;受试者在固定维度以及可调整维度中都倾向于使感官愉悦最大化。因此,受试者在提供的二维空间中使他们的愉悦最大化。