Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助开放经裂孔胃切除术治疗食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌:一项回顾性队列研究

Laparoscopic-assisted open transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Song Qi-Ying, Li Xiong-Guang, Zhang Li-Yu, Wu Di, Li Shuo, Zhang Ben-Long, Xu Zi-Yao, Wu Ri-Li-Ge, Guo Xin, Wang Xin-Xin

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):304-314. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.304.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The studies of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal gastrectomy (LTG) in patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) are scarce.

AIM

To compare the surgical efficiency of LTG with the open transhiatal gastrectomy (OTG) for patients with Siewert type II AEG.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a total of 578 patients with Siewert type II AEG who have undergone LTG or OTG at the First Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019. The short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the LTG ( = 382) and OTG ( = 196) groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the OTG group, the LTG group had a longer operative time but less blood loss, shorter length of abdominal incision and an increased number of harvested lymph nodes ( < 0.05). Patients in the LTG group were able to eat liquid food, ambulate, expel flatus and discharge sooner than the OTG group ( < 0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative complications and R0 resection. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival performed better in the LTG group compared with that in the OTG group (88.2% 79.2%, = 0.011; 79.7% 73.0%, = 0.002, respectively). In the stratified analysis, both overall survival and disease-free survival were better in the LTG group than those in the OTG group for stage II/III patients ( < 0.05) but not for stage I patients.

CONCLUSION

For patients with Siewert type II AEG, LTG is associated with better short-term outcomes and similar oncology safety. In addition, patients with advanced stage AEG may benefit more from LTG in the long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

关于腹腔镜辅助经裂孔胃切除术(LTG)治疗食管胃交界部(AEG)Siewert II型腺癌患者的研究较少。

目的

比较LTG与开放经裂孔胃切除术(OTG)治疗Siewert II型AEG患者的手术效率。

方法

我们回顾性评估了2014年1月至2019年12月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心接受LTG或OTG治疗的578例Siewert II型AEG患者。比较LTG组(n = 382)和OTG组(n = 196)的短期和长期结局。

结果

与OTG组相比,LTG组手术时间更长,但失血量更少,腹部切口长度更短,清扫淋巴结数量更多(P < 0.05)。LTG组患者比OTG组患者更早能够进食流食、下床活动、排气和出院(P < 0.05)。术后并发症和R0切除率方面未发现显著差异。LTG组的3年总生存率和无病生存率均优于OTG组(分别为88.2%对79.2%,P = 0.011;79.7%对73.0%,P = 0.002)。在分层分析中,II/III期患者中LTG组的总生存率和无病生存率均优于OTG组(P < 0.05),但I期患者中并非如此。

结论

对于Siewert II型AEG患者,LTG具有更好的短期结局且肿瘤学安全性相似。此外,晚期AEG患者可能从LTG的长期结局中获益更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验