• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放经裂孔入路治疗食管胃交界部癌的长期疗效

Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Transhiatal Approach for the Treatment of Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.

作者信息

Lee Yoontaek, Min Sa-Hong, Park Ki Bum, Park Young Suk, Ahn Sang-Hoon, Park Do Joong, Kim Hyung-Ho

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(1):62-71. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e1. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

DOI:10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e1
PMID:30944759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6441771/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LA) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) is advantageous since it allows better visualization of the surgical field than the open approach (OA). We compared the surgical outcomes of the 2 approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 108 patients with AEJ who underwent transhiatal distal esophagectomy and gastrectomy with curative intent between 2003 and 2015. Surgical outcomes were reviewed using electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The LA and OA were performed in 37 and 71 patients, respectively. Compared to the OA, the LA was associated with significantly shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (9 vs. 11 days, P=0.001), shorter proximal resection margins (3 vs. 7 mm, P=0.004), and extended operative times (240 vs. 191 min, P=0.001). No significant difference was observed between the LA and OA for intraoperative blood loss (100 vs. 100 mL, P=0.392) or surgical morbidity rate (grade≥II) for complications (8.1% vs. 23.9%, P=0.080). Two cases of anastomotic leakage occurred in the OA group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was not significantly different between the LA and OA groups (54 vs. 51, P=0.889). The 5-year overall and 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 81.8% and 50.7% (P=0.024) and 77.3% and 46.4% (P=0.009) for the LA and OA groups, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed no independent factors associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The LA is feasible and safe with short- and long-term oncologic outcomes similar to those of the OA.

摘要

目的

对于食管胃交界腺癌(AEJ),腹腔镜经裂孔入路(LA)具有优势,因为与开放入路(OA)相比,它能更好地观察手术视野。我们比较了这两种入路的手术结果。

材料与方法

我们分析了2003年至2015年间108例行经裂孔远端食管切除术和胃切除术且有治愈意图的AEJ患者。使用电子病历回顾手术结果。

结果

分别有37例和71例患者接受了LA和OA手术。与OA相比,LA术后住院时间显著缩短(9天对11天,P = 0.001),近端切缘更短(3毫米对7毫米,P = 0.004),手术时间延长(240分钟对191分钟,P = 0.001)。LA和OA在术中失血量(100毫升对100毫升,P = 0.392)或并发症手术发病率(≥II级)方面无显著差异(8.1%对23.9%,P = 0.080)。OA组发生2例吻合口漏。LA组和OA组收获的淋巴结数量无显著差异(54个对51个,P = 0.889)。LA组和OA组的5年总生存率和3年无复发生存率分别为81.8%和50.7%(P = 0.024)以及77.3%和46.4%(P = 0.009)。多变量分析显示无独立因素与总生存相关。

结论

LA可行且安全,其短期和长期肿瘤学结果与OA相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/4f4157c9298e/jgc-19-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/38f62df437a6/jgc-19-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/8f2dd91dbcd0/jgc-19-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/4f4157c9298e/jgc-19-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/38f62df437a6/jgc-19-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/8f2dd91dbcd0/jgc-19-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf2/6441771/4f4157c9298e/jgc-19-62-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Transhiatal Approach for the Treatment of Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔入路治疗食管胃交界部癌的长期疗效
J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(1):62-71. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e1. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
2
Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.腹腔镜与开腹经食管裂孔入路手术治疗食管胃交界部 Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌的短期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5687-6. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
[Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].[机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术对食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌患者淋巴结清扫及短期预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):156-163.
4
[Comparison of efficacy between laparoscopic and open proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].腹腔镜与开放近端胃切除术联合双通道重建治疗食管胃交界部SiewertⅡ型和Ⅲ型腺癌的疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 May 25;24(5):420-425. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200204-00037.
5
Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.经胸手术与经腹手术治疗食管胃交界部癌的meta分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 7;20(29):10183-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10183.
6
[Laparoscopic transhiatal proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: report of 98 cases].[腹腔镜经裂孔近端胃切除术治疗食管胃交界腺癌:98例报告]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;15(9):906-9.
7
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer.腹腔镜与开放经食管裂孔食管癌切除术治疗远端和交界部癌症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012 Apr;104(4):197-202. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000400005.
8
[Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术联合D2淋巴结清扫治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 May;19(5):530-4.
9
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagogastrectomy Without Thoracic or Cervical Access: A Series of One Hundred Three Consecutive Cases.无胸段或颈段入路的腹腔镜辅助经裂孔食管胃切除术:连续103例病例系列
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jul;28(7):845-852. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0692. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放经食管裂孔入路治疗食管胃结合部腺癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;47(4):778-788. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.022. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.胃食管交界腺癌的微创手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.
2
Effect of two surgical approaches on the lung function and prognosis of patients with combined esophagogastric cancer.两种手术方式对食管胃癌患者肺功能及预后的影响
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Sep 27;15(9):1986-1994. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1986.
3
Hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy in transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with esophageal invasion > 3 cm.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrence Pattern and Lymph Node Metastasis of Adenocarcinoma at the Esophagogastric Junction.胃食管结合部腺癌的复发模式和淋巴结转移。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3631-3639. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6011-3. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
2
Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.腹腔镜与开腹经食管裂孔入路手术治疗食管胃交界部 Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌的短期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5687-6. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Different time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries.
经胸单孔辅助腹腔镜食管胃切除术后手工吻合治疗食管胃结合部 Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌伴食管浸润>3cm。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):4104-4110. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10036-7. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
Thoracolaparoscopic radical resection of esophagogastric junction cancers with a NOSE-like approach to extract large specimens.经自然腔道标本取出术(NOSE)样入路胸腹腔镜联合根治性切除食管胃结合部癌并取出大标本
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e33120. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033120.
5
Laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal oesophagectomy: An experience from a tertiary care centre over 10 years.腹腔镜辅助经裂孔食管切除术:一家三级医疗中心10年的经验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):378-383. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_169_22.
6
Laparoscopic-assisted open transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜辅助开放经裂孔胃切除术治疗食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌:一项回顾性队列研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr 27;14(4):304-314. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.304.
三个亚洲国家胃食管结合部腺癌的不同时间趋势和治疗管理。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Apr;29 Suppl 2:18-25. doi: 10.1111/den.12808.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score-matched case-control study.腹腔镜辅助与开腹全胃切除术治疗 Siewert Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌的对比:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3495-3503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5375-y. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
5
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.胃及食管胃交界癌切缘受累的危险因素分析:一项意大利多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):70-82. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0589-6. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
7
Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia.一项随机临床试验的十年随访结果,该试验比较了左胸腹联合入路与经腹食管裂孔入路行食管胃交界部或贲门腺癌全胃切除术的疗效。
Br J Surg. 2015 Mar;102(4):341-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9764. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Impact of lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric junction carcinoma.下纵隔淋巴结清扫术对食管胃交界部癌治疗的影响
Anticancer Res. 2015 Jan;35(1):445-56.
9
Length of negative resection margin does not affect local recurrence and survival in the patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者的阴性切缘长度不影响局部复发和生存率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 14;20(30):10518-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10518.
10
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术与开腹全胃切除术治疗胃癌患者的短期和长期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2598-605. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2796-8. Epub 2013 Mar 29.