Are women equal? Considering impact of therapeutic abortion bans on science.
作者信息
Cushman Mary
机构信息
Larner College of Medicine University of Vermont Burlington Vermont USA.
出版信息
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 May 26;6(4):e12742. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12742. eCollection 2022 May.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Are women equal? Considering impact of therapeutic abortion bans on science.女性平等吗？论治疗性堕胎禁令对科学的影响。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 May 26;6(4):e12742. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12742. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Response to: "Are women equal? Considering impact of therapeutic abortion bans on science".回应：“女性平等吗？论治疗性堕胎禁令对科学的影响”
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jul 8;6(5):e12754. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12754. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
What will and won't happen when abortion is banned.堕胎被禁止后会发生什么以及不会发生什么。
J Law Biosci. 2022 Apr 28;9(1):lsac011. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac011. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
4
A chill wind blows: Webster, obstetrics, and the health of women.一阵寒风袭来：韦伯斯特、产科学与女性健康。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Aug;163(2):450-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91174-b.
5
The far-reaching impact of abortion bans: reproductive care and beyond.堕胎禁令的深远影响：生殖保健及其他方面。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Feb;28(1):23-27. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2140008. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.罗诉韦德案与“部分分娩堕胎”禁令。
Reprod Freedom News. 1998 Jan 22;7(1):6-8.
7
Reproductive rights: an international sample.生殖权利：一个国际样本。
Conscience. 1984 May-Jun;5(3):13-4.
8
Overview.概述。
State Reprod Health Monit. 1992 Dec;3(4):i-.
9
Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence.部分分娩堕胎：堕胎法理学的最后前沿。
Issues Law Med. 1998 Summer;14(1):3-57.
10
Equitable abortion care - A challenge for health care providers. Experiences from abortion care encounters with immigrant women in Stockholm, Sweden.公平的堕胎护理——医疗服务提供者面临的挑战。瑞典斯德哥尔摩与移民妇女堕胎护理接触的经验。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec;10:14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
引用本文的文献
1
Equity in scientific publishing: 2022 results from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis.科学出版中的公平性：2022年血栓与止血研究及实践成果
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Feb 15;7(1):100059. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100059. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Abortion access and the US medical workforce: a looming crisis for haematology.堕胎服务可及性与美国医疗劳动力：血液学面临的迫在眉睫的危机。
Lancet Haematol. 2022 Dec;9(12):e874-e875. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00324-6. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Response to: "Are women equal? Considering impact of therapeutic abortion bans on science".回应：“女性平等吗？论治疗性堕胎禁令对科学的影响”
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jul 8;6(5):e12754. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12754. eCollection 2022 Jul.
本文引用的文献
1
Annual report on equity, diversity, and inclusion: is meeting its goals.关于公平、多样性和包容性的年度报告：正在实现其目标。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Nov 2;5(7):e12610. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12610. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Mortality in the United States Using Enhanced Vital Records, 2016‒2017.美国利用增强型生命记录数据报告 2016-2017 年孕产妇死亡率的种族和民族差异
Am J Public Health. 2021 Sep;111(9):1673-1681. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306375. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
3
Diversity, equity, and inclusion in publishing: Calling thrombosis and hemostasis journals to action in support of women.出版领域的多样性、公平性与包容性：呼吁血栓与止血领域期刊行动起来支持女性。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Oct 16;4(7):1076-1079. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12434. eCollection 2020 Oct.
Zotero 插件