Bopp J, Cook C R
Butterworth Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Issues Law Med. 1998 Summer;14(1):3-57.
Partial-birth abortion bans patterned after the federal bill passed by both houses of Congress are constitutional. The clear legislative definition can be easily distinguished from other abortion procedures. Abortion precedents do not apply to such bans because the abortion right pertains to unborn human beings, not to those partially delivered. Such bans are also rationally-related to legitimate state interests. Even if abortion jurisprudence is deemed to apply in the partial-birth abortion context, a ban is still constitutional under Casey because a ban on partial-birth abortions does not impose an undue burden on the abortion right.
仿照国会两院通过的联邦法案制定的部分分娩堕胎禁令是符合宪法的。明确的立法定义很容易与其他堕胎程序区分开来。堕胎先例不适用于此类禁令,因为堕胎权涉及未出生的人类,而非那些已部分分娩的人。此类禁令也与合法的州利益合理相关。即使堕胎判例法被认为适用于部分分娩堕胎的情况,根据凯西案,一项禁令仍然是符合宪法的,因为禁止部分分娩堕胎并未对堕胎权施加过度负担。