Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical College of Medicine, Southwest Medical University, China.
Gynecology Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, China.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 25;2022:9339325. doi: 10.1155/2022/9339325. eCollection 2022.
To evaluate the value of combined detection of serum CA125, CA199, and HE4 in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Relevant articles retrieved from PubMed, Elsevier Science, Springer, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases were screened strictly according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included literature published from January 2005 to December 2021. (2) Serum HE4, CA125, CA199, and their combination for ovarian cancer diagnostic tests were studied, and healthy subjects or patients with the benign disease were taken as a control group. (3) Pathological tissue diagnosis as the gold standard. (4) Complete original data can be obtained. (5) The sample size was ≥20. (6) Language is limited to Chinese and English. Data features and QUADAS table were extracted from the included literature, and QUADAS evaluation tool detail table was used for the included study. Conduct quality evaluation. Statistical analysis was carried out using meta-disc software version 1.4. Appropriate effect model was selected to merge the effect size, and the forest maps of merge sensitivity, merge specificity, and merge likelihood ratio were obtained.
The results of meta-analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in diagnostic specificity analysis of CA125 (OR = 1.91, 95% CI (1.58, 2.32), < 0.00001, = 67%, = 6.58); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of CA125 (OR = 2.50, 95% CI (1.73, 3.62), < 0.00001, = 0%, = 4.90); diagnostic specificity analysis of CA199 (OR = 1.98, 95% CI (1.60, 2.44), < 0.00001, = 89%, = 6.35); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of CA199 (OR = 1.92, 95% CI (1.46, 2.52), < 0.00001, = 73%, = 4.70); diagnostic specificity analysis of HE4 (OR = 2.08, 95% CI (1.65, 2.63), < 0.00001, = 73%, = 6.19); diagnostic sensitivity analysis of HE4 (OR = 2.37, 95% CI (1.87, 3.00), < 0.00001, = 83%, = 7.19).
In the clinical assisted diagnosis of ovarian cancer, combined detection of CA125, CA199, and HE4 has the stronger discriminant ability and higher accuracy than single detection of CA125, which can improve the diagnostic efficiency.
评估联合检测血清 CA125、CA199 和 HE4 在卵巢癌诊断中的价值。
严格按照纳入和排除标准,从 PubMed、Elsevier Science、Springer、中国知网(CNKI)、万方和 VIP 数据库中筛选相关文献。纳入 2005 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月发表的文献。(2)研究血清 HE4、CA125、CA199 及其联合用于卵巢癌诊断试验的文献,以健康受试者或良性疾病患者为对照组。(3)以病理组织诊断为金标准。(4)可获得完整的原始数据。(5)样本量≥20。(6)语言限于中文和英文。从纳入文献中提取数据特征和 QUADAS 表,并使用纳入研究的 QUADAS 评价工具详细表进行质量评价。进行统计分析。使用 meta-disc 软件版本 1.4 选择合适的效应模型合并效应大小,并获得合并敏感性、合并特异性和合并似然比的森林图。
荟萃分析结果显示,CA125 的诊断特异性分析(OR=1.91,95%CI(1.58,2.32), < 0.00001, = 67%, = 6.58)存在统计学差异;CA125 的诊断敏感性分析(OR=2.50,95%CI(1.73,3.62), < 0.00001, = 0%, = 4.90);CA199 的诊断特异性分析(OR=1.98,95%CI(1.60,2.44), < 0.00001, = 89%, = 6.35);CA199 的诊断敏感性分析(OR=1.92,95%CI(1.46,2.52), < 0.00001, = 73%, = 4.70);HE4 的诊断特异性分析(OR=2.08,95%CI(1.65,2.63), < 0.00001, = 73%, = 6.19);HE4 的诊断敏感性分析(OR=2.37,95%CI(1.87,3.00), < 0.00001, = 83%, = 7.19)。
在卵巢癌的临床辅助诊断中,CA125、CA199 和 HE4 的联合检测比单独检测 CA125 具有更强的鉴别能力和更高的准确性,可提高诊断效率。