Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Aug;205:105678. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105678. Epub 2022 May 16.
Cross-fostering is a common nursing strategy in pig production, but there is sparse evidence on its effect on antibiotic usage and disease occurrence in piglets. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two nursing strategies on antibiotic usage, disease occurrence, weight gain and mortality in piglets. A 2×2 randomized factorial experiment was conducted in three Danish commercial pig production herds. The factors were nursing strategy (cross-fostering allowed (CF) vs. cross-fostering not allowed after initial litter equalisation (non-CF)) and weaning age (four vs. five weeks). In CF litters, the herd's usual cross-fostering strategy was applied. Piglets were followed individually from birth until weaning. Data was collected on antibiotic usage, mortality, weight gain and clinical disease. Only individual antibiotic treatments were allowed. At litter level, the effect of nursing strategy (CF vs. non-CF) on average daily gain, mortality, antibiotic treatment, clinical disease, face wounds and carpal wounds was analysed. In total, 241 litters were used for the data analysis. Approximately 30% of the CF litters were cross-fostered (either given a nurse sow, mingled with non-siblings or both) during the nursing period. The odds for antibiotic treatment during the suckling period were 1.58 times higher for CF litters compared to non-CF litters (P < 0.001). Across experimental groups, 60.8% of antibiotic treatments were administered for leg diseases. In CF litters, 15.7-21.3% of the antibiotic treatments were directed against diarrhoea, whereas in non-CF litters this was the case for less than 1%. In CF litters, the odds for carpal wounds were 1.40 times higher than in non-CF litters (P = 0.005). There was a tendency towards a higher occurrence of face wounds (OR = 1.30, P = 0.095) and clinical disease (OR = 1.25, P = 0.059) at weaning in CF litters compared to non-CF litters. There was no difference in average daily gain and mortality from birth to weaning between CF and non-CF litters. The results show that cross-fostering increases antibiotic usage in piglets during the nursing period and tends to affect the clinical health at weaning negatively.
交叉寄养是猪生产中常用的一种哺乳策略,但关于其对仔猪抗生素使用和疾病发生的影响的证据很少。本研究的目的是比较两种哺乳策略对仔猪抗生素使用、疾病发生、体重增加和死亡率的影响。在丹麦的三个商业猪生产农场进行了 2×2 随机析因实验。因素是哺乳策略(允许交叉寄养(CF)与初始产仔数相等后不允许交叉寄养(非 CF))和断奶年龄(4 周与 5 周)。在 CF 窝中,采用了该养殖场通常的交叉寄养策略。从出生到断奶,对仔猪进行个体跟踪。收集抗生素使用、死亡率、体重增加和临床疾病的数据。仅允许个体进行抗生素治疗。在窝水平上,分析了哺乳策略(CF 与非 CF)对平均日增重、死亡率、抗生素治疗、临床疾病、面部伤口和腕部伤口的影响。共有 241 窝用于数据分析。大约 30%的 CF 窝在哺乳期间(要么给予哺乳母猪,要么与非同胞混合,要么两者兼有)进行了交叉寄养。与非 CF 窝相比,CF 窝在哺乳期接受抗生素治疗的几率高 1.58 倍(P<0.001)。在实验组中,60.8%的抗生素治疗是针对腿部疾病的。在 CF 窝中,15.7-21.3%的抗生素治疗针对腹泻,而非 CF 窝中则不到 1%。在 CF 窝中,腕部伤口的几率比非 CF 窝高 1.40 倍(P=0.005)。CF 窝的面部伤口(OR=1.30,P=0.095)和临床疾病(OR=1.25,P=0.059)的发生率在断奶时比非 CF 窝有增加的趋势。从出生到断奶,CF 窝和非 CF 窝的平均日增重和死亡率没有差异。结果表明,在哺乳期,交叉寄养会增加仔猪的抗生素使用量,并可能对断奶时的临床健康状况产生负面影响。