Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France; Université Paris Cité, IRD, Inserm, Ceped, F-75006, Paris, France.
Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115068. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115068. Epub 2022 May 29.
Universal HIV testing is now recommended in generalised HIV epidemic settings. Although home-based HIV counselling and testing (HB-HCT) has been shown to be effective in achieving high levels of HIV status awareness, little is still known about the cost implications of universal and repeated HB-HCT. We estimated the costs of repeated HB-HCT and the scale economies that can be obtained when increasing the population coverage of the intervention. We used primary data from the ANRS 12249 Treatment as Prevention (TasP) trial in rural South Africa (2012-2016), whose testing component included six-monthly repeated HB-HCT. We relied on the dynamic system generalised method of moments (GMM) approach to produce unbiased short- and long-run estimates of economies of scale, using the number of contacts made by HIV counsellors for HB-HCT as the scale variable. We also estimated the mediating effect of the contact quality - measured as the proportion of HIV tests performed among all contacts eligible for an HIV test - on scale economies. The mean cost (standard deviation) of universal and repeated HB-HCT was $24.2 (13.7) per contact, $1694.3 (1527.8) per new HIV diagnosis, and $269.2 (279.0) per appropriate referral to HIV care. The GMM estimations revealed the presence of economies of scale, with a 1% increase in the number of contacts for HB-HCT leading to a 0.27% decrease in the mean cost. Our results also suggested a significant long-run relationship between mean cost and scale, with a 1% increase in the scale leading to a 0.36% decrease in mean cost in the long run. Overall, we showed that significant cost savings can be made from increasing population coverage. Nevertheless, there is a risk that this gain is made at the expense of quality: the higher the quality of HB-HCT activities, the lower the economies of scale.
普遍进行艾滋病病毒检测现已在艾滋病病毒广泛流行的环境中得到推荐。虽然家庭为基础的艾滋病病毒咨询和检测(HB-HCT)已被证明可有效提高艾滋病病毒状况知晓率,但对于普遍和重复开展 HB-HCT 的成本影响仍知之甚少。我们评估了重复 HB-HCT 的成本以及增加干预措施覆盖人群时可获得的规模经济。我们利用了南非农村地区 ANRS 12249 治疗即预防(TasP)试验的原始数据(2012-2016 年),其检测部分包括每六个月重复进行 HB-HCT。我们依靠动态系统广义矩方法(GMM)来产生规模经济的无偏短期和长期估计,使用艾滋病病毒咨询员进行 HB-HCT 的联系次数作为规模变量。我们还估计了联系质量(以所有符合艾滋病病毒检测条件的接触者中进行的艾滋病病毒检测比例衡量)对规模经济的中介作用。普遍和重复 HB-HCT 的平均成本(标准差)为每个接触者 24.2(13.7)美元,每个新艾滋病病毒诊断的费用为 1694.3(1527.8)美元,每例恰当转介到艾滋病病毒护理的费用为 269.2(279.0)美元。GMM 估计显示存在规模经济,HB-HCT 联系人数增加 1%,平均成本降低 0.27%。我们的结果还表明,平均成本与规模之间存在长期关系,规模增加 1%,长期平均成本降低 0.36%。总体而言,我们表明增加覆盖人群可带来显著的成本节约。然而,存在以质量为代价获得这种收益的风险:HB-HCT 活动质量越高,规模经济越低。