Crebolder H F
Aust Clin Rev. 1987 Mar;7(24):32-5.
The relation between peer review and postgraduate training proved to be complex. Involvement occurred by way of three projects (PI, PII, and PIII) involving 1,200 general practitioners by directed or self-motivated assessment. The simple assumption that the discovery by audit of knowledge, skills of attitude gaps, automatically lead to appropriate training, proved to be untrue. Experience learned that auditing itself is an educational process which links up with the individual needs of the participants. More study, research and experience is needed with regard to the interrelationship between peer review and postgraduate training, but both are essential and integral elements of the striving for excellence and quality.
同行评议与研究生培训之间的关系被证明是复杂的。通过三个项目（项目一、项目二和项目三）进行了参与，这些项目通过定向或自主评估涉及了1200名全科医生。那种认为通过审核发现知识、技能或态度差距就会自动带来适当培训的简单假设被证明是不成立的。经验表明，审核本身就是一个与参与者个人需求相关联的教育过程。关于同行评议与研究生培训之间的相互关系，还需要更多的研究、探讨和经验积累，但两者都是追求卓越和质量的重要且不可或缺的要素。
