Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15596.
Birth at hospitals with an appropriate level of neonatal intensive care units is associated with better neonatal outcomes. The primary sources for information about hospital neonatal unit levels for prospective parents, referring physicians, and the public are hospital websites, but the accuracy of neonatal unit capacity is unclear.
To determine if hospital websites accurately report the capabilities of intermediate (ie, level II) units, which are intended for care of newborns with low to moderate illness levels or the stabilization of newborns prior to transfer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study compared descriptions of level II unit capabilities on hospital web pages in 10 large states with their respective state-level designation. Analyzed units were located in the 10 states with the highest number of live births in 2019 (excluding states with no level II regulations) and had active websites as of May 2021.
Hospital websites were assessed for whether there was any mention of the unit, the description of the unit was provided, the unit was identified as a level III or both levels II and III, the terms "neonatal intensive care unit" or "NICU" were used without indicating limits in care available or newborn acuity, or the unit was claimed to provide the most advanced level of care.
A total 28 states had no regulation of nursery unit levels; in the 10 large, regulated states, web descriptions of level II units were incomplete for 39.2% of hospitals (95% CI, 33.3%-45.3%) and inaccurate for 24.6% (95% CI, 19.6%-30.2%). Within incomplete descriptions, 2.6% (95% CI, 1.1%-5.3%) of hospitals did not mention an advanced care unit and 22.0% (95% CI, 17.2%-27.5%) identified a level II unit without providing further description. Within inaccurate descriptions, 25.4% (95% CI, 20.3%-31.0%) of hospitals described the unit as a "neonatal intensive care unit" or "NICU" without any qualification and 9.3% (95% CI, 6.3%-13.5%) claimed that the unit provided the most advanced neonatal care or care to the sickest newborns; 3.0% of hospitals (95% CI, 1.3%-6.0%) stated that their unit was level III and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%) as level II and III. Across states there was substantial variation in rates of incompleteness and inaccuracy.
Incomplete and inaccurate hospital web descriptions of intermediate newborn care units are common. These deficits can mislead parents, clinicians, and the public about the appropriateness of a hospital for sick newborns, which raises important ethical questions.
在具备适当新生儿重症监护病房水平的医院分娩与更好的新生儿结局相关。对于准父母、转诊医生和公众来说,医院网站是了解医院新生儿病房水平的主要信息来源,但新生儿病房容量的准确性尚不清楚。
确定医院网站是否准确报告了中级(即二级)病房的能力,这些病房旨在为病情较轻或需要在转移前稳定的新生儿提供护理。
设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究比较了 10 个大州的医院网页上对二级病房能力的描述与其各自的州级指定之间的差异。分析的病房位于 2019 年活产数最多的 10 个州(不包括没有二级规定的州),并且截至 2021 年 5 月,这些州的网站仍处于活跃状态。
评估了医院网站是否提到了该病房、提供了该病房的描述、该病房被标识为三级或二级和三级、使用了“新生儿重症监护病房”或“NICU”而没有说明可用的护理范围或新生儿的严重程度,或者该病房声称提供了最先进的护理水平。
共有 28 个州没有对托儿所病房水平进行监管;在这 10 个大的、受监管的州中,二级病房的网页描述在 39.2%(95%CI,33.3%-45.3%)的医院中不完整,在 24.6%(95%CI,19.6%-30.2%)的医院中不准确。在不完整的描述中,2.6%(95%CI,1.1%-5.3%)的医院未提及高级护理病房,22.0%(95%CI,17.2%-27.5%)的医院未提供进一步描述而将二级病房标识为二级病房。在不准确的描述中,25.4%(95%CI,20.3%-31.0%)的医院将该病房描述为“新生儿重症监护病房”或“NICU”而没有任何限定,9.3%(95%CI,6.3%-13.5%)的医院声称该病房提供了最先进的新生儿护理或对最病重的新生儿的护理;3.0%(95%CI,1.3%-6.0%)的医院(95%CI,1.3%-6.0%)表示其病房为三级,1.5%(95%CI,0.4%-3.8%)的医院表示为二级和三级。各州之间的不完整性和不准确程度存在很大差异。
医院网页对中级新生儿护理病房的描述不完整和不准确的情况很常见。这些缺陷可能会误导父母、临床医生和公众对医院适合治疗新生儿疾病的程度,这引发了重要的伦理问题。