• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析

The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.

作者信息

Tan Denise Jia Yun, Ko Tsz Ki, Fan Ka Siu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom.

Department of Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.

DOI:10.2196/47762
PMID:38010802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10714271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare disease that is strongly associated with exposure to the Epstein-Barr virus and is characterized by the formation of malignant cells in nasopharynx tissues. Early diagnosis of NPC is often difficult owing to the location of initial tumor sites and the nonspecificity of initial symptoms, resulting in a higher frequency of advanced-stage diagnoses and a poorer prognosis. Access to high-quality, readable information could improve the early detection of the disease and provide support to patients during disease management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the quality and readability of publicly available web-based information in the English language about NPC, using the most popular search engines.

METHODS

Key terms relevant to NPC were searched across 3 of the most popular internet search engines: Google, Yahoo, and Bing. The top 25 results from each search engine were included in the analysis. Websites that contained text written in languages other than English, required paywall access, targeted medical professionals, or included nontext content were excluded. Readability for each website was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease score and the Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Website quality was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and DISCERN tools as well as the presence of a Health on the Net Foundation seal.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 suitable websites were included in this study; 26% (15/57) of the websites were academic. The mean JAMA and DISCERN scores of all websites were 2.80 (IQR 3) and 57.60 (IQR 19), respectively, with a median of 3 (IQR 2-4) and 61 (IQR 49-68), respectively. Health care industry websites (n=3) had the highest mean JAMA score of 4 (SD 0). Academic websites (15/57, 26%) had the highest mean DISCERN score of 77.5. The Health on the Net Foundation seal was present on only 1 website, which also achieved a JAMA score of 3 and a DISCERN score of 50. Significant differences were observed between the JAMA score of hospital websites and the scores of industry websites (P=.04), news service websites (P<.048), charity and nongovernmental organization websites (P=.03). Despite being a vital source for patients, general practitioner websites were found to have significantly lower JAMA scores compared with charity websites (P=.05). The overall mean readability scores reflected an average reading age of 14.3 (SD 1.1) years.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest an inconsistent and suboptimal quality of information related to NPC on the internet. On average, websites presented readability challenges, as written information about NPC was above the recommended reading level of sixth grade. As such, web-based information requires improvement in both quality and accessibility, and healthcare providers should be selective about information recommended to patients, ensuring they are reliable and readable.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/efb48f704420/formative_v7i1e47762_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/68fcc4dd9b04/formative_v7i1e47762_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/8e8d28a1cfc4/formative_v7i1e47762_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/6d33e53b30f4/formative_v7i1e47762_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/7cd6fa196354/formative_v7i1e47762_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/efb48f704420/formative_v7i1e47762_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/68fcc4dd9b04/formative_v7i1e47762_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/8e8d28a1cfc4/formative_v7i1e47762_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/6d33e53b30f4/formative_v7i1e47762_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/7cd6fa196354/formative_v7i1e47762_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921e/10714271/efb48f704420/formative_v7i1e47762_fig5.jpg
摘要

背景

鼻咽癌(NPC)是一种罕见疾病,与感染爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒密切相关,其特征是鼻咽组织中形成恶性细胞。由于初始肿瘤部位的位置以及初始症状的非特异性,鼻咽癌的早期诊断往往很困难,导致晚期诊断的频率较高且预后较差。获取高质量、易读的信息可以改善该疾病的早期检测,并在疾病管理期间为患者提供支持。

目的

本研究旨在使用最流行的搜索引擎评估互联网上公开可用的英文鼻咽癌相关信息的质量和可读性。

方法

在3个最流行的互联网搜索引擎(谷歌、雅虎和必应)中搜索与鼻咽癌相关的关键词。每个搜索引擎的前25个结果纳入分析。排除包含非英语文本、需要付费访问、针对医学专业人员或包含非文本内容的网站。使用弗莱什易读性分数和弗莱什-金凯德年级水平评估每个网站的可读性。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)和DISCERN工具以及网络健康基金会认证标志评估网站质量。

结果

总体而言,本研究纳入了57个合适的网站;其中26%(15/57)的网站是学术性的。所有网站的JAMA和DISCERN平均得分分别为2.80(四分位距3)和57.60(四分位距19),中位数分别为3(四分位距2 - 4)和61(四分位距49 - 68)。医疗保健行业网站(n = 3)的JAMA平均得分最高,为4(标准差0)。学术网站(15/57,26%)的DISCERN平均得分最高,为77.5。只有1个网站有网络健康基金会认证标志,该网站的JAMA得分为3,DISCERN得分为50。医院网站的JAMA得分与行业网站(P = 0.04)、新闻服务网站(P < 0.048)、慈善和非政府组织网站(P = 0.03)的得分之间存在显著差异。尽管全科医生网站是患者的重要信息来源,但发现其JAMA得分与慈善网站相比显著较低(P = 0.05)。总体平均可读性分数反映平均阅读年龄为14.3(标准差1.1)岁。

结论

本研究结果表明互联网上与鼻咽癌相关的信息质量参差不齐且不理想。平均而言,网站存在可读性挑战,因为关于鼻咽癌的书面信息高于六年级的推荐阅读水平。因此,基于网络的信息在质量和可及性方面都需要改进,医疗保健提供者应谨慎选择向患者推荐的信息,确保其可靠且易读。

相似文献

1
The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.
2
IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.下腔静脉滤器 - 评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101695. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
4
An Evaluation of the Content Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Publicly Available Web-Based Information on Pneumothorax Surgery in Ireland.爱尔兰气胸手术公开网络信息的内容质量、可读性及可靠性评估
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63800. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63800. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.基于网络的阿拉伯语假牙卫生健康信息的质量与可读性:一项信息流行病学研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):956-960.
6
A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.关于肺动脉高压的互联网网站的质量、准确性和可靠性的系统评价。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1404-1413. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-325OC.
7
Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.互联网上脊柱侧凸特定信息的横断面分析:可能导致患者困惑和错误信息。
Spine Deform. 2020 Dec;8(6):1159-1167. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00156-8. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
10
Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on periodontal disease.基于网络的牙周病阿拉伯文健康信息的质量和可读性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01413-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools/instruments for assessing YouTube videos on surgical procedures for patient/consumer health education: a systematic review.用于评估YouTube上手术操作患者/消费者健康教育视频的工具/仪器:一项系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;13:1575801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575801. eCollection 2025.
2
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
3
Artificial intelligence in pediatric dental trauma: do artificial intelligence chatbots address parental concerns effectively?

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT's Ability to Assess Quality and Readability of Online Medical Information: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT评估在线医学信息质量和可读性的能力:一项横断面研究的证据。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42214. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Evaluating YouTube as a source of patient information for pediatric tracheostomy care.评估 YouTube 作为小儿气管切开术护理患者信息来源。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;171:111580. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111580. Epub 2023 May 31.
3
Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment from Present to Future: Where Are We and Where Are We Heading?
儿科牙科创伤中的人工智能:人工智能聊天机器人能否有效解决家长的担忧?
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 17;25(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06105-z.
4
Assessing the quality and readability of patient education materials on chemotherapy cardiotoxicity from artificial intelligence chatbots: An observational cross-sectional study.评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的关于化疗心脏毒性的患者教育材料的质量和可读性:一项观察性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e42135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042135.
5
Quality Assessment of Medical Institutions' Websites Regarding Prescription Drug Misuse of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists by Off-Label Use for Weight Loss: Website Evaluation Study.医疗机构网站关于胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂用于减肥的非标签使用导致处方药滥用的质量评估:网站评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 1;9:e68792. doi: 10.2196/68792.
6
Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis.关于耳鼻咽喉异物的网络信息的质量和可读性评估:定性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 15;8:e55535. doi: 10.2196/55535.
7
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
复发性/转移性鼻咽癌的治疗:现状与未来展望
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Sep;24(9):1138-1166. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01101-3. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
A closer look at nasopharyngeal cancer: A typical case report.深入剖析鼻咽癌:一则典型病例报告。
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 May 16;18(7):2507-2510. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.04.017. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Compassion Fatigue Education: What Is Available Online for Nurses? A Consumer Website Review.共情疲劳教育:护士可从哪些在线资源获取?消费者网站评价。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2023 May;54(5):216-224. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20230405-06. Epub 2023 May 1.
6
Risk Factors Associated with Nasopharyngeal Cancer Incidences in Indonesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与印度尼西亚鼻咽癌发病率相关的风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Apr 1;24(4):1105-1111. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1105.
7
Real-time in vivo cancer staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with rapid fiberoptic Raman endoscopy.利用快速光纤拉曼内镜对鼻咽癌患者进行实时体内癌症分期
Talanta. 2023 Jul 1;259:124561. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124561. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
8
A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.基于互联网的颈部解剖患者信息的关键可读性与质量分析
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.手部骨关节炎在线信息的质量和可读性。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Jan-Mar;29(1):14604582231169297. doi: 10.1177/14604582231169297.
10
The role of Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒在鼻咽癌中的作用。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1116143. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116143. eCollection 2023.