• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比利时胰腺癌护理患者报告体验测量(PREPARE)项目的开发、测试与实施:多方法研究项目方案

Development, Testing, and Implementation of the Belgian Patient Reported Experience Measure for Pancreatic Cancer Care (PREPARE) Project: Protocol for a Multi-Method Research Project.

作者信息

Moens Katrien, Peeters Marc, Van den Bulcke Marc, Leys Mark, Horlait Melissa

机构信息

Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

University Hospital Antwerp (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 6;11(6):e29004. doi: 10.2196/29004.

DOI:10.2196/29004
PMID:35666559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210207/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with pancreatic cancer do not feel involved in the development of their treatment and care plans. In Belgium, these plans are decided on during multidisciplinary team meetings. However, limited time is spent on the discussion of the preferences of the patient during these meetings. This research project aims to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for pancreatic cancer and assess if its use can support collaborative treatment decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to outline the protocol for a multi-method research project to improve person-centered pancreatic cancer care in Belgium. Three subobjectives are pursued: (1) to develop a PREM to assess the experiences of care-related aspects in pancreatic cancer care, (2) to validate the PREM, and (3) to develop and evaluate an educational intervention to support the use of the PREM's results.

METHODS

For the development of the PREM, an exploratory mixed methods study design will be used. The study will start with a survey followed by a telephone interview involving patients with pancreatic cancer and digestive oncology health care professionals. Study two is the testing of the content and construct validity of the PREM. Study three involves the implementation study according to the Medical Research Council framework of a complex intervention introducing the PREM in practice. The effectiveness of the intervention will be investigated using a pragmatic randomized controlled trial study design.

RESULTS

The protocol presents the entire structure of the research project. Ethics approval to conduct the exploratory mixed methods study (objective 1) has been obtained, and recruitment has started since January 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer should not be considered a hurdle to not study this patient population group. Involving patients in the research and decision-making processes early on is key. This project aims to realize a scientifically sound research process providing research outputs that can easily and timely be implemented in the care trajectory of patients with pancreatic cancer. This research project will also lead to recommendations on how to involve patients with pancreatic cancer and how the methodology of this research project can be translated to other patient groups.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/29004.

摘要

背景

胰腺癌患者感觉自己没有参与到其治疗和护理计划的制定过程中。在比利时,这些计划是在多学科团队会议上决定的。然而,在这些会议上用于讨论患者偏好的时间有限。本研究项目旨在开发一种针对胰腺癌的患者报告体验测量工具(PREM),并评估其使用是否有助于支持协作性治疗决策。

目的

本文旨在概述一项多方法研究项目的方案,以改善比利时以患者为中心的胰腺癌护理。该项目追求三个子目标:(1)开发一种PREM,以评估胰腺癌护理中与护理相关方面的体验;(2)验证该PREM;(3)开发并评估一项教育干预措施,以支持PREM结果的使用。

方法

为了开发PREM,将采用探索性混合方法研究设计。该研究将首先进行一项调查,随后对胰腺癌患者和消化肿瘤医疗保健专业人员进行电话访谈。研究二是对PREM的内容和结构效度进行测试。研究三涉及根据医学研究理事会的复杂干预框架进行实施研究,即在实践中引入PREM。将使用务实的随机对照试验研究设计来调查干预措施的有效性。

结果

该方案展示了研究项目的整体结构。已获得开展探索性混合方法研究(目标1)的伦理批准,自2022年1月起已开始招募参与者。

结论

不应将胰腺癌患者的不良预后视为不研究该患者群体的障碍。尽早让患者参与研究和决策过程是关键。本项目旨在实现一个科学合理的研究过程,提供能够轻松、及时地在胰腺癌患者护理轨迹中实施的研究成果。该研究项目还将就如何让胰腺癌患者参与以及如何将本研究项目的方法应用于其他患者群体提出建议。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/29004

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d61/9210207/90ec9c42f9fa/resprot_v11i6e29004_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d61/9210207/90ec9c42f9fa/resprot_v11i6e29004_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d61/9210207/90ec9c42f9fa/resprot_v11i6e29004_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development, Testing, and Implementation of the Belgian Patient Reported Experience Measure for Pancreatic Cancer Care (PREPARE) Project: Protocol for a Multi-Method Research Project.比利时胰腺癌护理患者报告体验测量(PREPARE)项目的开发、测试与实施:多方法研究项目方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 6;11(6):e29004. doi: 10.2196/29004.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Designing Implementation Strategies for a Digital Suicide Safety Planning Intervention in a Psychiatric Emergency Department: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project.为精神科急诊科的数字自杀安全计划干预设计实施策略:多方法研究项目方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 9;12:e50643. doi: 10.2196/50643.
4
Development and testing of a patient-reported experience measure for cancer: A cross-sectional survey.一种癌症患者报告体验测量方法的开发与测试:一项横断面调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):312-327. doi: 10.1111/jan.15767. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer).开发并验证了一种用于实验性癌症药物(PREM-ECM)及其护理人员的患者报告体验测量工具(PREM-ECM-Carer)。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11963-x.
6
Protocol for the development and validation of a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for people with hearing loss: the PREM-HeLP.用于听力损失患者的患者报告体验测量(PREM)的开发和验证方案:PREM-HeLP。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 29;13(11):e075229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075229.
7
PROMs and PREMs in routine perinatal care: mixed methods evaluation of their implementation into integrated obstetric care networks.常规围产期护理中的 PROMs 和 PREMs:将其纳入综合产科护理网络的实施情况的混合方法评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00568-w.
8
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
9
An Evidence-Based Health Care Knowledge Integration System: Assessment Protocol.基于证据的医疗保健知识整合系统:评估方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 11;8(3):e11754. doi: 10.2196/11754.
10
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and application of patient-reported experience measures for cancer patients: a scoping review.癌症患者自我报告体验测量方法的开发与应用:一项范围综述
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Apr 11;8:100327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100327. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?胰腺癌手术:对患者而言什么最重要?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 11;12(14):4611. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144611.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences and supportive care needs of UK patients with pancreatic cancer: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.英国胰腺癌患者的经验和支持性护理需求:一项横断面问卷调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 4;9(11):e032681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032681.
2
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.
3
Can practitioners use patient reported measures to enhance person centred coordinated care in practice? A qualitative study.
从业者能否使用患者报告的测量指标来增强实践中的以患者为中心的协调护理?一项定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 4;16(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1045-1.
4
Cancer patient experience measures: An evidence review.癌症患者体验测量:证据综述。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2016 May-Jun;34(3):200-22. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1157717. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Teams and teamwork during a cancer diagnosis: interdependency within and between teams.癌症诊断过程中的团队与团队协作:团队内部及团队之间的相互依存关系。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):231-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003376. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
6
Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK.最严重癌症中共同决策的障碍:对在英国接受治疗的胰腺癌患者的定性研究
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3302-12. doi: 10.1111/hex.12319. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
7
Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.审视患者体验调查在衡量医疗质量方面的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):522-54. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541480. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
8
Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a mixed-methods study.慢性病患者多学科团队会议中治疗计划实施的决定因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):867-76. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002818. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
9
Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective.影响癌症多学科团队决策和决策实施的因素:提供者视角的访谈研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
10
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.运用和报告德尔菲法选择医疗质量指标:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. Epub 2011 Jun 9.