• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定情感共情:经验抽样法和多层次结构方程模型提供了一种个体内部视角。

Affect-specific empathy: Experience sampling and multilevel structural equation modeling provide a within-person perspective.

作者信息

Löchner Nana, Bückle Sophie, Olderbak Sally

机构信息

Department of Molecular Psychology.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy.

出版信息

Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):708-721. doi: 10.1037/emo0001105. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1037/emo0001105
PMID:35666909
Abstract

There are intraindividual differences in empathic tendencies across situations. Empathy research, however, has traditionally focused on differences between people. This between-person approach does not necessarily describe the structure of empathy for individual people. Additionally, it is unclear whether the valence of affect perceived in the target person moderates the empathic process. Through a microlongitudinal experience sampling study ( = 117 adults, = 6,307) we investigated within-person variation in empathy. Applying a variance component analysis, we found substantial individual differences in affect-specific empathy. Then, using multilevel structural equation modeling, we developed a within-person and between-person model of affect-specific empathy, identifying different factor correlation patterns at the within-person and between-person levels. For the within-person level, participants mostly empathized cognitively and affectively either for positive or negative affect, but rarely at the same time. For the between-person level, we found separate affect-specific dimensions for affective empathy, indicating that in general, individuals report affective empathy for one affect (e.g., positive) more than the other (e.g., negative). However, there was no affect-specific differentiation for cognitive empathy. Beyond the average within-person model for all participants combined, we found large differences between persons in the extent to which they simultaneously experienced positive and/or negative affective and/or cognitive empathy. Implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

个体在不同情境下的共情倾向存在个体内差异。然而,共情研究传统上关注的是人与人之间的差异。这种人际间的研究方法不一定能描述个体的共情结构。此外,目标人物所感知到的情感效价是否会调节共情过程尚不清楚。通过一项微观纵向经验抽样研究(n = 117名成年人,n = 6307次),我们调查了个体内共情的变化。应用方差成分分析,我们发现了情感特异性共情中存在显著的个体差异。然后,使用多层结构方程模型,我们构建了一个情感特异性共情的个体内和人际间模型,确定了个体内和人际间水平上不同的因素相关模式。在个体内水平上,参与者大多在认知和情感上对积极或消极情感产生共情,但很少同时出现。在人际间水平上,我们发现了情感共情的独立情感特异性维度,这表明总体而言,个体对一种情感(如积极情感)的情感共情报告多于另一种情感(如消极情感)。然而,认知共情不存在情感特异性差异。除了所有参与者综合的平均个体内模型之外,我们还发现个体在同时体验积极和/或消极情感和/或认知共情的程度上存在很大差异。本文讨论了研究结果的意义和未来方向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Affect-specific empathy: Experience sampling and multilevel structural equation modeling provide a within-person perspective.特定情感共情:经验抽样法和多层次结构方程模型提供了一种个体内部视角。
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):708-721. doi: 10.1037/emo0001105. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Emotion perception and empathy: An individual differences test of relations.情绪感知与共情:关系的个体差异测试
Emotion. 2017 Oct;17(7):1092-1106. doi: 10.1037/emo0000308. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
Work event experiences: Implications of an expanded taxonomy for understanding daily well-being.工作事件体验:扩展分类法对理解日常幸福感的意义。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Aug;26(4):304-325. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000276. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Individual Differences in the Competence for Physical-Activity-Related Affect Regulation Moderate the Activity-Affect Association in Real-Life Situations.与体育活动相关的情感调节能力的个体差异调节了现实生活情境中的活动-情感关联。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018 Aug 1;40(4):196-205. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2018-0017. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Identifying profiles of affective change: An ecological momentary assessment of flourishers.识别情感变化特征:繁荣者的生态瞬间评估。
Emotion. 2021 Apr;21(3):584-594. doi: 10.1037/emo0000741. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
6
Empathy trumps prejudice: The longitudinal relation between empathy and anti-immigrant attitudes in adolescence.同理心胜过偏见:青少年同理心与反移民态度的纵向关系。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Apr;54(4):703-717. doi: 10.1037/dev0000474. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
Vagal Tone Differences in Empathy Level Elicited by Different Emotions and a Co-Viewer.不同情绪和共同观看者引发的同理心水平的迷走神经紧张度差异。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 1;20(11):3136. doi: 10.3390/s20113136.
8
Modeling individual differences in emotion regulation repertoire in daily life with multilevel latent profile analysis.采用多层次潜在剖面分析对日常生活中情绪调节策略的个体差异进行建模。
Emotion. 2020 Dec;20(8):1462-1474. doi: 10.1037/emo0000669. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Empathy at work: The role of age and emotional job demands.工作中的同理心:年龄和情绪工作要求的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Feb;36(1):36-48. doi: 10.1037/pag0000469.
10
An experience-sampling study on the relevance of affect dynamics to paranoid ideation.一项关于情感动态与偏执观念相关性的经验取样研究。
Emotion. 2023 Feb;23(1):111-123. doi: 10.1037/emo0000807. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Empathy in Adults with Acquired Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人获得性脑损伤中的同理心:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09667-5.
2
Do you feel what I feel? The relation between congruence of perceived affect and self-reported empathy in daily life social situations.你能感受到我的感受吗?日常生活社交情境中感知情感的一致性与自我报告的同理心之间的关系。
Emotion. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1037/emo0001531.
3
Differences between problematic internet and smartphone use and their psychological risk factors in boys and girls: a network analysis.
男孩和女孩中网络与智能手机使用问题及其心理风险因素的差异:一项网络分析
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jun 12;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00620-z.