Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Toulouse, France.
Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Urol Oncol. 2022 Aug;40(8):384.e9-384.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
To date, multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation, enrollment in trials evaluating the role of perioperative therapies and deferred active treatments represent accepted strategies for patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), which are under investigation to maximize cancer control and implement health care policies and value-based care. Here, we aimed to identify subgroups of patients with RCC who may benefit from early referral for MDT evaluation at diagnosis in light of an increased risk of recurrence relative to the risk of dying of other causes.
We relied on a prospective dataset including patients diagnosed with RCC from 1998 to 2019 and treated by means of surgery alone at a tertiary referral center. The risk of other cause mortality (OCM) was evaluated against the risk of distant metastasis over time by means of the Weibull regression. Patients were stratified based on clinical stage (cT1a; cT1b; cT2; cT3-4), age (<60; 60-70; >70) and comorbidities [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 0 vs. ≥1]. For each combination of cT stage, age, and CCI, the potential need for an MDT referral was defined when the risk of recurrence exceeded the risk of OCM within the lower limit of the 95% CI of the meantime to recurrence.
Overall, 1,162 (51%) patients had no comorbidities. Median follow-up was 7 years. Patients who would benefit most from an MDT evaluation are those diagnosed with A) cT3-4 disease (any age or comorbidity) or B) cT2 cancers if healthy and younger than 70 years or younger than 60 years with at least 1 comorbidity or C) cT1b if younger than 60 years and without comorbidities.
Our findings can help selecting the optimal candidates for multidisciplinary evaluations and to consider RCC patients for clinical trials, deferred treatment, and treatment policy improvement. Also, our findings can be useful in the case of major healthcare disruptions, such as pandemics.
迄今为止,多学科团队(MDT)评估、参与评估围手术期治疗作用的临床试验以及推迟积极治疗代表了接受肾细胞癌(RCC)治疗的患者的既定策略,这些策略正在接受研究,以最大限度地控制癌症并实施医疗保健政策和基于价值的护理。在这里,我们旨在确定 RCC 患者亚组,这些患者相对于因其他原因死亡的风险,复发风险增加,因此可能从诊断时早期转介至 MDT 评估中受益。
我们依赖于一个包括 1998 年至 2019 年期间在三级转诊中心接受单纯手术治疗的 RCC 患者的前瞻性数据集。通过 Weibull 回归评估其他原因死亡率(OCM)与随时间推移发生远处转移的风险。根据临床分期(cT1a;cT1b;cT2;cT3-4)、年龄(<60;60-70;>70)和合并症[Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)0 与≥1]对患者进行分层。对于 cT 分期、年龄和 CCI 的每种组合,如果复发风险超过复发时间中位数的 95%CI 的下限内的 OCM 风险,则定义需要 MDT 转介。
总体而言,1162(51%)例患者无合并症。中位随访时间为 7 年。最需要 MDT 评估的患者是那些诊断为 A)cT3-4 疾病(任何年龄或合并症)或 B)健康且年龄小于 70 岁或小于 60 岁且至少有 1 种合并症或 C)cT1b 岁以下且无合并症的患者。
我们的发现可以帮助选择最佳的 MDT 评估候选者,并考虑将 RCC 患者纳入临床试验、延迟治疗和治疗政策改善。此外,我们的发现在发生重大医疗保健中断(如大流行)的情况下可能很有用。