Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 127 Changle West Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Oct;46(5):2280-2286. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02954-z. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Supra-brow and sub-brow blepharoplasty are two types of upper eyelid blepharoplasties that are commonly performed in middle-aged Asian women to correct skin laxity of the upper eyelid; the postoperative scar formation of the two procedures may be different. Therefore, we designed this retrospective study to explore the differences in postoperative scarring between patients receiving supra- or sub-brow blepharoplasty.
We identified 52 patients who underwent supra-brow blepharoplasty and 54 patients who underwent sub-brow blepharoplasty. For each patient, the scar quality was assessed using photographs, the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), and the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) 1 year following surgery.
For OSAS, higher scores for pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface, and overall opinion were observed in patients who underwent supra-brow blepharoplasty (p < 0.05) except for the "vascular score" (p = 0.148). The average overall opinion scores of the supra- and sub-brow blepharoplasty were 3.90 ± 0.41 and 2.33 ± 0.48, respectively, indicating that acceptance of postoperative scars in patients who underwent supra-brow blepharoplasty was worse than that in patients who underwent sub-brow blepharoplasty. Significantly higher scores were observed in all items of PSAS items for patients with supra-brow blepharoplasty (p < 0.05).
The postoperative scars in patients who underwent supra-brow blepharoplasty were more obvious than those in sub-brow blepharoplasty. From the perspective of postoperative scar formation, sub-brow blepharoplasty may be a more suitable choice for patients.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
眉上和眉下双眼皮成形术是两种常见的用于矫正中年亚洲女性上眼睑皮肤松弛的上眼睑成形术; 这两种手术的术后瘢痕形成可能不同。因此,我们设计了这项回顾性研究,以探讨接受眉上或眉下双眼皮成形术的患者术后瘢痕形成的差异。
我们确定了 52 例接受眉上双眼皮成形术的患者和 54 例接受眉下双眼皮成形术的患者。术后 1 年,对每位患者的照片、观察者瘢痕评估量表(OSAS)和患者瘢痕评估量表(PSAS)进行瘢痕质量评估。
对于 OSAS,在接受眉上双眼皮成形术的患者中,除了“血管评分”(p = 0.148)外,在色素沉着、厚度、缓解、柔韧性、表面和整体意见评分方面,得分更高(p < 0.05)。眉上和眉下双眼皮成形术的平均整体意见评分分别为 3.90 ± 0.41 和 2.33 ± 0.48,这表明接受眉上双眼皮成形术的患者对术后瘢痕的接受程度不如接受眉下双眼皮成形术的患者。接受眉上双眼皮成形术的患者在 PSAS 所有项目中的得分均明显更高(p < 0.05)。
接受眉上双眼皮成形术的患者的术后瘢痕比接受眉下双眼皮成形术的患者更明显。从术后瘢痕形成的角度来看,眉下双眼皮成形术可能是患者更合适的选择。
证据水平 V:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。