Department of Hematology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08020-3.
Substantial proliferation of eHealth has enabled a move in patient-centred cancer care from the traditional in-person care model to real-time, dynamic, and technology supported on-demand care. However, in general, the uptake of these innovations is low. Studies show that eHealth is helpful in providing patient empowerment through e.g. providing high quality and timely information, enabling self-monitoring and shared decision making, but dropout rates are high and guidance for optimal implementation is lacking.
To explore barriers to and facilitators for nationwide implementation and consolidation of CMyLife, a multi-component, patient-centred, digital care platform, and to construct a comprehensive implementation guide for launching digital care platforms in daily clinical practice.
The first qualitative case study of a digital care platform like CMyLife was performed including five focus group- and eighteen in-depth interviews with stakeholders. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide, based on the frameworks of Grol and Flottorp. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed and barriers and facilitators were identified and categorized according to the frameworks. An iterative process including participation of main stakeholders and using the CFIR-ERIC framework led to creating a comprehensive implementation guide for digital care platforms.
In total, 45 barriers and 41 facilitators were identified. Main barriers were lack of connectivity between information technology systems, changing role for both health care providers and patients, insufficient time and resources, doubts about privacy and security of data, and insufficient digital skills of users. Main facilitators mentioned were motivating patients and health care providers by clarifying the added value of use of a digital care platform, clear business case with vision, demonstrating (cost) effectiveness, using an implementation guide, and educating patients and health care providers about how to use CMyLife. Based on these barriers and facilitators a clear and comprehensive implementation guide was developed for digital care platforms.
Several barriers to and facilitators for implementation were identified, a clear overview was presented, and a unique comprehensive implementation guide was developed for launching future digital care platforms in daily clinical practice. The next step is to validate the implementation guide in other (oncological) diseases.
电子健康技术的大量应用使得以患者为中心的癌症护理从传统的面对面护理模式转变为实时、动态和技术支持的按需护理。然而,总的来说,这些创新的采用率很低。研究表明,电子健康技术通过提供高质量和及时的信息、实现自我监测和共享决策等方式有助于增强患者的能力,但辍学率很高,缺乏最佳实施的指导。
探索在全国范围内实施和巩固 CMyLife(一种多组件、以患者为中心的数字护理平台)的障碍和促进因素,并构建一个全面的实施指南,用于在日常临床实践中推出数字护理平台。
对 CMyLife 等数字护理平台进行了第一次定性案例研究,包括对利益相关者进行了五次焦点小组访谈和十八次深入访谈。数据收集采用基于 Grol 和 Flottorp 框架的半结构化访谈指南。对访谈记录进行了分析,并根据框架识别和分类了障碍和促进因素。一个包括主要利益相关者参与并使用 CFIR-ERIC 框架的迭代过程导致创建了一个全面的数字护理平台实施指南。
总共确定了 45 个障碍和 41 个促进因素。主要障碍包括信息技术系统之间缺乏连接、医疗保健提供者和患者角色的变化、时间和资源不足、对数据隐私和安全的疑虑以及用户数字技能不足。主要促进因素包括通过阐明使用数字护理平台的附加值来激励患者和医疗保健提供者、明确具有愿景的商业案例、展示(成本)效益、使用实施指南以及教育患者和医疗保健提供者如何使用 CMyLife。基于这些障碍和促进因素,为数字护理平台制定了一个清晰而全面的实施指南。
确定了实施的几个障碍和促进因素,提供了清晰的概述,并为在日常临床实践中推出未来的数字护理平台制定了独特的全面实施指南。下一步是在其他(肿瘤)疾病中验证实施指南。