• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过模拟开发的机械生命支持算法,用于植入式左心室辅助装置接受者的住院急诊管理。

Mechanical life support algorithm developed by simulation for inpatient emergency management of recipients of implantable left ventricular assist devices.

作者信息

Akhtar Waqas, Gamble Brigitte, Kiff Kristine, Wypych-Zych Agnieszka, Raj Binu, Takata Junko, Gil Fernando Riesgo, Hurtado Ana, Rosenberg Alex, Bowles Christopher T

机构信息

Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield, Uxbridge UB96JH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2022 May 31;10:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100254. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100254
PMID:35669526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9162943/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Published guidance concerning emergency management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is both limited and lacking in consensus which increases the risk of delayed and/or inappropriate actions.

METHODS

In our specialist tertiary referral centre we developed, by iteration, a novel in-hospital resuscitation algorithm for LVAD emergencies which we validated through simulation and assessment of our multi-disciplinary team. A Mechanical Life Support course was established to provide theoretical and practical education combined with simulation to consolidate knowledge and confidence in algorithm use. We assessed these measures using confidence scoring, a key performance indicator (the time taken to restart LVAD function) and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination.

RESULTS

The mean baseline staff confidence score in management of LVAD emergencies was 2.4 ± 1.2 out of a maximum of 5 (n = 29). After training with simulation, mean confidence score increased to 3.5 ± 0.8 (n = 13).Clinical personnel who were provided with the novel resuscitation algorithm were able to reduce time taken to restart LVAD function from a mean value of 49 ± 8.2 seconds (pre-training) to 20.4 ± 5 seconds (post-training) (n = 42, p < 0.0001).The Mechanical Life Support course increased mean confidence from 2.5 ± 1.2 to 4 ± 0.6 (n = 44, p < 0.0001) and mean MCQ score from 18.7 ± 3.4 to 22.8 ± 2.6, out of a maximum of 28 (n = 44, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We present a simplified LVAD Advanced Life Support algorithm to aid the crucial first minutes of resuscitation where basic interventions are likely to be critical in assuring good patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

关于左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者的应急管理,已发表的指南有限且缺乏共识,这增加了延迟和/或采取不当行动的风险。

方法

在我们的专科三级转诊中心,我们通过反复迭代制定了一种针对LVAD紧急情况的新型院内复苏算法,并通过模拟和对多学科团队的评估对其进行了验证。我们设立了机械生命支持课程,提供理论和实践教育,并结合模拟,以巩固对算法使用的知识和信心。我们使用信心评分、一项关键绩效指标(恢复LVAD功能所需的时间)和多项选择题(MCQ)考试来评估这些措施。

结果

在LVAD紧急情况管理方面,工作人员的平均基线信心评分为2.4±1.2(满分5分,n = 29)。经过模拟培训后,平均信心评分提高到3.5±0.8(n = 13)。获得新型复苏算法的临床人员能够将恢复LVAD功能所需的时间从平均49±8.2秒(培训前)缩短至20.4±5秒(培训后)(n = 42,p < 0.0001)。机械生命支持课程将平均信心从2.5±1.2提高到4±0.6(n = 44,p < 0.0001),平均MCQ评分从18.7±3.4提高到22.8±2.6(满分28分,n = 44,p < 0.0001)。

结论

我们提出了一种简化的LVAD高级生命支持算法,以帮助在复苏的关键最初几分钟,此时基本干预措施对于确保良好的患者预后可能至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98a2/9162943/457021d47909/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98a2/9162943/a1dae678795b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98a2/9162943/457021d47909/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98a2/9162943/a1dae678795b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98a2/9162943/457021d47909/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical life support algorithm developed by simulation for inpatient emergency management of recipients of implantable left ventricular assist devices.通过模拟开发的机械生命支持算法,用于植入式左心室辅助装置接受者的住院急诊管理。
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 31;10:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100254. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Mechanical life support algorithm for the emergency management of patients with left-sided Impella.用于左侧Impella患者急诊管理的机械生命支持算法
Br J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 9;30(3):24. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2023.024. eCollection 2023.
3
Mechanical life support algorithm for emergency management of patient receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.体外膜肺氧合患者紧急处理的机械生命支持算法。
Perfusion. 2024 Jul;39(5):896-901. doi: 10.1177/02676591231168291. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
Extracorporeal life support to left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplant: A strategy to optimize survival and resource utilization.体外生命支持过渡到左心室辅助装置作为心脏移植的桥梁:一种优化生存和资源利用的策略。
Circulation. 1999 Nov 9;100(19 Suppl):II206-10. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.suppl_2.ii-206.
5
British societies guideline on the management of emergencies in implantable left ventricular assist device recipients in transplant centres.英国移植中心植入式左心室辅助装置受者紧急情况管理协会指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Apr;50(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07382-y. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
6
Cardiac extracorporeal life support: state of the art in 2007.心脏体外生命支持:2007年的技术现状
Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:104-15. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001217.
7
Quality of Life Following Urgent LVAD Implantation for ECMO Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock: A Long-Term Follow-Up.心源性休克患者接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗后紧急植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后的生活质量:长期随访。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 24;57(8):747. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080747.
8
Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.左心室辅助装置:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(3):1-69. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
9
The Minnesota mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation consortium for treatment of out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation: Program description, performance, and outcomes.明尼苏达移动体外心肺复苏联盟治疗院外难治性室颤:项目描述、实施情况及结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 13;29-30:100632. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100632. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
The prognostic value of end tidal carbon dioxide during cardiac arrest: a systematic review.心搏骤停时呼气末二氧化碳的预后价值:系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1470-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical life support algorithm for the emergency management of patients with left-sided Impella.用于左侧Impella患者急诊管理的机械生命支持算法
Br J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 9;30(3):24. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2023.024. eCollection 2023.
2
British societies guideline on the management of emergencies in implantable left ventricular assist device recipients in transplant centres.英国移植中心植入式左心室辅助装置受者紧急情况管理协会指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Apr;50(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07382-y. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Five-year outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation in England.英格兰左心室辅助装置植入后的 5 年结果。
Open Heart. 2021 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001658.
2
Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population.英国桥接移植左心室辅助装置人群的患者生存和治疗结果。
Heart. 2019 Feb;105(4):291-296. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313355. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
3
Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices.
指导救护车临床医生管理植入式旋转左心室辅助设备患者急救的算法。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Dec;34(12):842-850. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206172. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults and Children With Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.成人和儿童机械循环支持下的心肺复苏:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):e1115-e1134. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000504. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Emergency procedures for patients with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device.带连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的紧急程序。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Dec;34(12):831-841. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204912. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Diagnosis and Treatment Algorithm for Blood Flow Obstructions in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.左心室辅助装置患者血流阻塞的诊断和治疗算法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 14;67(23):2758-2768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.573.
7
Requirement for a structured algorithm in cardiac arrest following major trauma: epidemiology, management errors, and preventability of traumatic deaths in Berlin.重大创伤后心脏骤停的结构化算法需求:柏林创伤性死亡的流行病学、管理错误和可预防因素。
Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
8
Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.第五次 INTERMACS 年度报告:来自 6000 多名机械循环支持患者的风险因素分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Feb;32(2):141-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.004.