• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于混合层次分析法和模糊聚类算法的飞机安全设计建模与仿真。

Modeling and Simulation in an Aircraft Safety Design Based on a Hybrid AHP and FCA Algorithm.

机构信息

Aeronautics Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710038, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 27;2022:6424057. doi: 10.1155/2022/6424057. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/6424057
PMID:35669672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9167115/
Abstract

Throughout the world, the reliability-based approach to safety design of aircraft systems is quite mature and widely used. However, there are still shortcomings in the reliability-based aircraft system safety analysis method. It cannot dynamically analyze the accident evolution process and lack consideration of the complex situation of multifactor coupling. On the basis of the original aircraft system safety analysis method, this paper innovatively proposes a functional hazard analysis (FHA) method based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multifactor fuzzy comprehensive assessment (FCA). The purpose is to improve the objectivity and quantification of the FHA method in the safety design of aircraft systems. At the same time, in the terminal airworthiness verification, this paper proposes a repeatable and controllable virtual test flight verification method, which aims to reduce the cost and cycle of the terminal airworthiness verification and expand the coverage of the envelope verification. Finally, combined with the clauses in MIL-HDBK-516B, a case calculation is carried out to verify the feasibility of the proposed method.

摘要

在全球范围内,基于可靠性的飞机系统安全设计方法已经相当成熟并得到广泛应用。然而,基于可靠性的飞机系统安全分析方法仍然存在一些缺陷,无法动态分析事故演化过程,并且缺乏对多因素耦合复杂情况的考虑。在原始飞机系统安全分析方法的基础上,本文创新性地提出了一种基于层次分析法(AHP)和多因素模糊综合评估(FCA)的功能危险分析(FHA)方法,旨在提高飞机系统安全设计中 FHA 方法的客观性和量化程度。同时,在终端适航验证中,本文提出了一种可重复和可控的虚拟试飞验证方法,旨在降低终端适航验证的成本和周期,并扩大包线验证的覆盖范围。最后,结合 MIL-HDBK-516B 中的条款,进行了案例计算,验证了所提出方法的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/3b39321581b7/CIN2022-6424057.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/25a908f90b8a/CIN2022-6424057.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/be06ec0ebf3d/CIN2022-6424057.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/4f3330b6e12b/CIN2022-6424057.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/aa4c52880627/CIN2022-6424057.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/d58b8d20ed82/CIN2022-6424057.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/984853cfc788/CIN2022-6424057.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/f43a237cf794/CIN2022-6424057.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/3acb53b1e01a/CIN2022-6424057.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/e04c871b8aa5/CIN2022-6424057.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/680fa4727215/CIN2022-6424057.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/6dfe93c836a6/CIN2022-6424057.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/357affe718be/CIN2022-6424057.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/3b39321581b7/CIN2022-6424057.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/25a908f90b8a/CIN2022-6424057.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/be06ec0ebf3d/CIN2022-6424057.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/4f3330b6e12b/CIN2022-6424057.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/aa4c52880627/CIN2022-6424057.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/d58b8d20ed82/CIN2022-6424057.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/984853cfc788/CIN2022-6424057.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/f43a237cf794/CIN2022-6424057.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/3acb53b1e01a/CIN2022-6424057.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/e04c871b8aa5/CIN2022-6424057.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/680fa4727215/CIN2022-6424057.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/6dfe93c836a6/CIN2022-6424057.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/357affe718be/CIN2022-6424057.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/381e/9167115/3b39321581b7/CIN2022-6424057.013.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling and Simulation in an Aircraft Safety Design Based on a Hybrid AHP and FCA Algorithm.基于混合层次分析法和模糊聚类算法的飞机安全设计建模与仿真。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 27;2022:6424057. doi: 10.1155/2022/6424057. eCollection 2022.
2
Real-Time Reliability Verification for UAV Flight Control System Supporting Airworthiness Certification.支持适航认证的无人机飞行控制系统实时可靠性验证
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 5;11(12):e0167168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167168. eCollection 2016.
3
Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach.基于综合人可靠性量化方法的飞行安全评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231391. eCollection 2020.
4
A comprehensive assessment of environmental factors in aircraft cockpit based on fuzzy evaluation.基于模糊评价的飞机驾驶舱环境因素综合评估
Work. 2024;77(1):171-184. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220583.
5
Implementation of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fine-Kinney method (FKM) against risk factors to determine the total cost of occupational health and safety precautions in environmental research laboratories.运用层次分析法(AHP)和芬尼金尼法(FKM)针对风险因素进行分析,以确定环境研究实验室职业健康和安全防护措施的总成本。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2606-2622. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2010969. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
State-of-the-art on analytic hierarchy process in the last 40 years: Literature review based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modelling.40 年来分析层次过程的最新进展:基于潜在狄利克雷分配主题建模的文献综述。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0268777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268777. eCollection 2022.
7
An Intelligent Clinical Psychological Assessment Method Based on AHP-LSSVR Model.基于层次分析法-最小二乘支持向量机模型的智能临床心理评估方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 30;2022:7584675. doi: 10.1155/2022/7584675. eCollection 2022.
8
A Differential Evolution-Based Consistency Improvement Method in AHP With an Optimal Allocation of Information Granularity.一种基于差分进化的层次分析法一致性改进方法及信息粒度的最优分配
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022 Jul;52(7):6733-6744. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3035909. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
9
Dynamic avoidance decision method for civil aircraft in a suborbital debris hazard zone.亚轨道碎片危险区中民用飞机的动态回避决策方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 1;18(8):e0289500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289500. eCollection 2023.
10
A combination of extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy GRA for government E-tendering in hybrid fuzzy environment.混合模糊环境下用于政府电子招标的扩展模糊层次分析法与模糊灰色关联分析法相结合的方法
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:123675. doi: 10.1155/2014/123675. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
State of science: models and methods for understanding and enhancing teams and teamwork in complex sociotechnical systems.科学现状:理解和增强复杂社会技术系统中的团队和团队合作的模型和方法。
Ergonomics. 2022 Feb;65(2):161-187. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2000043. Epub 2021 Dec 23.