Suppr超能文献

基础胰岛素与 GLP-1 受体激动剂的固定比例与自由联合治疗 GLP-1 受体激动剂控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病:系统评价和间接治疗比较。

Free Versus Fixed-Ratio Combination of Basal Insulin and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Asan Diabetes Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 20;13:870722. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.870722. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the free up-titration of basal insulin and fixed-ratio combination (FRC) of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with GLP-1RA.

METHODS

With the use of a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases through July 2021, randomized controlled trials that compared the free up-titration or FRC with remaining on GLP-1RA in T2DM patients uncontrolled with GLP-1RA were included. A comparison of adding basal insulin to maintaining GLP-1RA and an indirect comparison between the two strategies were conducted on the change in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), target achievement [HbA1c < 7.0%], and the risk of confirmed hypoglycemia. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Two free up-titration and two FRC trials involving 1,612 participants, all lasting 26 weeks, were included. Both approaches significantly lowered HbA1c levels (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.75%, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.53) but increased hypoglycemic risk [risk ratio (RR) 7.59, 95% CI 3.35-17.17] compared to the unchanged GLP-1RA. No significant differences were discovered between the two methods regarding the decrease in HbA1c (WMD 0.08%, 95% CI -1.07% to 1.23%), FPG (WMD -2.29 mg/dl, 95% CI -45.07 to 40.49 mg/dl), target achievement (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.50-2.14), and hypoglycemic risk (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03-3.59).

CONCLUSION

In patients who failed to reach target HbA1c levels despite the GLP-1RA treatment, both strategies of adding basal insulin, free up-titration and FRC, are comparable options are comparable options.

摘要

简介

本研究评估了在接受胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗但血糖控制仍不达标的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,自由调整基础胰岛素剂量和基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的固定比例联合(FRC)的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过对 2021 年 7 月前在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行的系统文献回顾,纳入了比较 GLP-1RA 治疗控制不佳的 T2DM 患者继续使用 GLP-1RA 与自由调整基础胰岛素剂量或 FRC 的随机对照试验。对添加基础胰岛素维持 GLP-1RA 与两种策略之间的间接比较进行了比较,比较了 HbA1c、空腹血糖(FPG)、目标达标[HbA1c<7.0%]和确诊低血糖风险的变化。采用 Cochrane 协作组工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入 2 项自由调整基础胰岛素剂量和 2 项 FRC 试验,共 1612 名参与者,所有试验均持续 26 周。两种方法均显著降低 HbA1c 水平(加权均数差[WMD]-0.75%,95%CI-0.97 至-0.53),但与未改变的 GLP-1RA 相比,低血糖风险增加[风险比(RR)7.59,95%CI3.35-17.17]。两种方法在 HbA1c 降低(WMD0.08%,95%CI-1.07%至 1.23%)、FPG(WMD-2.29mg/dl,95%CI-45.07 至 40.49mg/dl)、目标达标(RR1.03,95%CI0.50-2.14)和低血糖风险(RR0.32,95%CI0.03-3.59)方面无显著差异。

结论

在接受 GLP-1RA 治疗但血糖仍未达到目标 HbA1c 水平的患者中,添加基础胰岛素的两种策略,即自由调整基础胰岛素剂量和 FRC,是可比较的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5f0/9165059/19ebf79e1cdd/fendo-13-870722-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验