• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型活性锌溶液,与洗必泰和聚维酮碘相比,对铜绿假单胞菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜具有更高的疗效。

A Novel Activated Zinc Solution with Improved Efficacy Against Pseudomonas and MRSA Biofilm Compared to Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine.

作者信息

Hill Derek L, Castiaux Andre, Pensler Elizabeth, Knue Joseph, Attar Paul S, Siddiqi Ahmed

机构信息

AZ Solutions, LLC, Ferndale, Michigan.

Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2022 Nov 15;41:17-23. doi: 10.52198/22.STI.41.SO1595.

DOI:10.52198/22.STI.41.SO1595
PMID:35671527
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The search for the optimal agent for infection eradication in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging as there are limited efficacious and safe options. The ideal solution should have significant bactericidal and anti-biofilm activity to be able to eradicate infection with the preservation of prosthetic components. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to 1) investigate the anti-biofilm efficacy of a novel activated zinc solution against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm in vitro and 2) compare its efficacy against two leading commercially available antimicrobial irrigants (CHG and 0.35% povidone-iodine [PI]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modified Robbins device (MRD) was utilized to replicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MRSA biofilms. The primary outcome was to determine bacterial reduction after two hours of biofilm exposure to an activated zinc solution, CHG, and PI, and compare to untreated controls.

RESULTS

Against Pseudomonas biofilm, activated zinc demonstrated a 4.5-log (99.996%) reduction, chlorhexidine demonstrated a 0.9-log (87.4%) reduction (p<0.001), and PI demonstrated a 0.8-log (83.1%) reduction (p<0.001). After two hours of exposure, activated zinc had undetectable MRSA with a 7.08-log (100%) reduction, chlorhexidine had a 1.9-log (98.7%) reduction (p<0.01), and PI had a 3.2-log (99.9%) reduction (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel activated zinc compound demonstrated a 99.996% reduction in Pseudomonas biofilm and a 100% reduction in MRSA biofilm. This novel solution may provide a significant tool in the arsenal to treat and/or prevent PJI and other wound infections. Future in vivo studies are warranted to demonstrate clinical utility, efficacy, and safety.

摘要

引言

由于有效且安全的选择有限,寻找用于根除人工关节周围感染(PJI)的最佳药物仍然具有挑战性。理想的解决方案应具有显著的杀菌和抗生物膜活性,以便能够在保留假体组件的情况下根除感染。因此,本研究的目的是:1)在体外研究一种新型活性锌溶液对铜绿假单胞菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)生物膜的抗生物膜功效;2)将其功效与两种领先的市售抗菌冲洗剂(洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐[CHG]和0.35%聚维酮碘[PI])进行比较。

材料与方法

使用改良的罗宾斯装置(MRD)来复制铜绿假单胞菌和MRSA生物膜。主要结果是确定生物膜暴露于活性锌溶液、CHG和PI两小时后的细菌减少情况,并与未处理的对照进行比较。

结果

对于铜绿假单胞菌生物膜,活性锌使细菌减少了4.5个对数(99.996%),洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐使细菌减少了0.9个对数(87.4%)(p<0.001),PI使细菌减少了0.8个对数(83.1%)(p<0.001)。暴露两小时后,活性锌使MRSA无法检测到,减少了7.08个对数(100%),洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐减少了1.9个对数(98.7%)(p<0.01),PI减少了3.2个对数(99.9%)(p<0.01)。

结论

我们的新型活性锌化合物使铜绿假单胞菌生物膜减少了99.996%,使MRSA生物膜减少了100%。这种新型溶液可能为治疗和/或预防PJI及其他伤口感染提供一种重要工具。未来有必要进行体内研究以证明其临床实用性、疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
A Novel Activated Zinc Solution with Improved Efficacy Against Pseudomonas and MRSA Biofilm Compared to Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine.一种新型活性锌溶液,与洗必泰和聚维酮碘相比,对铜绿假单胞菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜具有更高的疗效。
Surg Technol Int. 2022 Nov 15;41:17-23. doi: 10.52198/22.STI.41.SO1595.
2
A novel activated-zinc antiseptic solution effective against MRSA and a pig model.一种新型激活锌抗菌溶液,可有效对抗 MRSA 并在猪模型中起作用。
J Wound Care. 2022 Jul 1;31(Sup7):S41-S50. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup7.S41.
3
Antibiotics Enhance Prevention and Eradication Efficacy of Cathodic-Voltage-Controlled Electrical Stimulation against Titanium-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.抗生素增强阴极电压控制电刺激对钛相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的预防和清除效果。
mSphere. 2019 May 1;4(3):e00178-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00178-19.
4
Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.常见消毒剂对生物膜中临床相关微生物的功效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2.
5
The effects of chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine and vancomycin on growth and biofilms of pathogens that cause prosthetic joint infections: an in-vitro model.洗必泰、聚维酮碘和万古霉素对人工关节感染病原体生长和生物膜形成的影响:体外模型。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep;151:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
Hydrogen Peroxide, Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Fail to Eradicate Biofilm from Infected Implant Materials.过氧化氢、聚维酮碘和氯己定无法清除感染植入材料上的生物膜。
Life (Basel). 2023 May 23;13(6):1230. doi: 10.3390/life13061230.
7
Efficacy of Intraoperative Antiseptic Techniques in the Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Superiority of Betadine.术中抗菌技术预防人工关节感染的疗效:聚维酮碘优于洗必泰。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S312-S318. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
0.01% Hypochlorous Acid as an Alternative Skin Antiseptic: An In Vitro Comparison.0.01%次氯酸作为一种替代性皮肤消毒剂:体外比较
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1489-1493. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001594.
9
Antimicrobial efficacy of eucalyptus oil and 1,8-cineole alone and in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate against microorganisms grown in planktonic and biofilm cultures.桉叶油和 1,8-桉叶素单独及与洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐联合对浮游和生物膜培养物中生长的微生物的抗菌效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1219-25. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp362. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
10
Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.纳米颗粒超声处理在消除钛表面金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜方面优于传统冲洗液:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2729-2734. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03982-y. Epub 2024 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Activity of Antiseptics Against and Its Adaptation Potential.防腐剂的活性及其适应潜力。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;14(1):30. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010030.