Suppr超能文献

使用动态肩部模型比较下斜方肌和Latissimus dorsi 转移治疗不可修复的后上方肩袖撕裂的生物力学。

Biomechanical comparison of lower trapezius and latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears using a dynamic shoulder model.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Nov;31(11):2392-2401. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the setting of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PSRCTs), lower trapezius transfer (LTT) may be anatomically better positioned for restoring the muscular force couple compared with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of LTT and LDT on glenohumeral kinematics using a dynamic shoulder model.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age: 56.5 ± 17.2 years) were tested using a dynamic shoulder simulator. The maximum abduction angle (MAA), superior humeral head migration (SHM), and cumulative deltoid forces (CDFs) were compared across 4 conditions: (1) native; (2) irreparable PSRCT; (3) LTT using an Achilles tendon allograft; and (4) LDT. MAA and SHM were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking. CDF was recorded in real time throughout the dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators.

RESULTS

Compared to the native state, the PSRCT resulted in a significant decrease (Δ-24.1°; P < .001) in MAA, with a subsequent significant increase after LTT (Δ13.1°; P < .001) and LDT (Δ8.9°; P < .001). LTT achieved a significantly greater MAA than LDT (Δ4.2°; P = .004). Regarding SHM, both LTT (Δ-9.4 mm; P < .001) and LDT (Δ-5.0 mm; P = .008) demonstrated a significant decrease compared with the PSRCT state. LTT also achieved significantly less SHM compared with the LDT (Δ-4.4 mm; P = .011). Further, only the LTT resulted in a significant decrease in CDF compared with the PSRCT state (Δ-21.3 N; P = .048), whereas LTT and LDT showed similar CDF (Δ-11.3 N; P = .346). However, no technique was able to restore the MAA, SHM, and CDF of the native shoulder (P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LTT and LDT both achieved a significant increase in MAA along with significantly less SHM compared with the PSRCT state. Although LTT required significantly less compensatory deltoid forces compared with the PSRCT state, this was not observed for the LDT. Further, the LTT prevented loss of abduction motion and SHM more sufficiently. In the challenging treatment of irreparable PSRCTs, LTT may restore native glenohumeral kinematics more sufficiently, potentially leading to improved postoperative functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

在无法修复的后上方肩袖撕裂(PSRCT)的情况下,与背阔肌转移(LDT)相比,斜方肌下部转移(LTT)在恢复肌肉力偶方面可能具有更好的解剖位置。本研究的目的是使用动态肩部模型评估 LTT 和 LDT 对肩肱关节运动学的影响。

方法

使用动态肩部模拟器测试 10 个新鲜冷冻尸体肩部(平均年龄:56.5±17.2 岁)。在 4 种情况下比较最大外展角度(MAA)、肱骨头上移(SHM)和累积三角肌力(CDF):(1)正常;(2)无法修复的 PSRCT;(3)使用跟腱同种异体移植物的 LTT;(4)LDT。通过 3 维运动跟踪测量 MAA 和 SHM。通过与致动器相连的负载细胞实时记录动态外展运动中的 CDF。

结果

与正常状态相比,PSRCT 导致 MAA 显著下降(Δ-24.1°;P<.001),随后 LTT(Δ13.1°;P<.001)和 LDT(Δ8.9°;P<.001)显著增加。LTT 获得的 MAA 明显大于 LDT(Δ4.2°;P=.004)。关于 SHM,与 PSRCT 状态相比,LTT(Δ-9.4mm;P<.001)和 LDT(Δ-5.0mm;P=.008)均表现出明显减少。LTT 也比 LDT 明显减少 SHM(Δ-4.4mm;P=.011)。此外,只有 LTT 与 PSRCT 状态相比,CDF 显著降低(Δ-21.3N;P=.048),而 LTT 和 LDT 的 CDF 相似(Δ-11.3N;P=.346)。然而,没有任何技术能够恢复正常肩部的 MAA、SHM 和 CDF(P<.001,分别)。

结论

与 PSRCT 状态相比,LTT 和 LDT 都使 MAA 显著增加,同时 SHM 显著减少。尽管与 PSRCT 状态相比,LTT 需要的三角肌补偿力显著减少,但 LDT 则不然。此外,LTT 更充分地防止了外展运动和 SHM 的丧失。在治疗无法修复的 PSRCT 方面,LTT 可能更充分地恢复了正常的肩肱关节运动学,从而可能带来更好的术后功能结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验