Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(3):624-630. doi: 10.1177/03635465231223514. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
In young patients with irreparable subscapularis deficiency (SSC-D) and absence of severe osteoarthritis, anterior latissimus dorsi transfer (aLDT) has been proposed as a treatment option to restore the anteroposterior muscular force couple to regain sufficient shoulder function. However, evidence regarding the biomechanical effect of an aLDT on glenohumeral kinematics remains sparse.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an aLDT on range of glenohumeral abduction motion, superior migration of the humeral head (SM), and cumulative deltoid force (cDF) in a simulated SSC-D model using a dynamic shoulder model. It was hypothesized that an aLDT would restore native shoulder kinematics by reestablishing the insufficient anteroposterior force couple.
Controlled laboratory study.
Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a validated shoulder simulator. Glenohumeral abduction angle (gAA), SM, and cDF were compared across 3 conditions: (1) native, (2) SSC-D, and (3) aLDT. gAA and SM were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking, while cDF was recorded in real time during dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators.
The SSC-D significantly decreased gAA (Δ-9.8°; 95% CI, -14.1° to -5.5°; < .001) and showed a significant increase in SM (Δ2.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1 mm; = .003), while cDF was similar (Δ7.8 N; 95% CI, -9.2 to 24.7 N; = .586) when compared with the native state. Performing an aLDT resulted in a significantly increased gAA (Δ3.8°; 95% CI, 1.8° to 5.7°; < .001), while cDF (Δ-36.1 N; 95% CI, -48.7 to -23.7 N; < .001) was significantly reduced compared with the SSC-D. For the aLDT, no anterior subluxation was observed. However, the aLDT was not able to restore native gAA (Δ-6.1°; 95% CI, -8.9° to -3.2°; < .001).
In this cadaveric study, performing an aLDT for an irreparable subscapularis insufficiency restored the anteroposterior force couple and prevented superior and anterior humeral head migration, thus improving glenohumeral kinematics. Furthermore, compensatory deltoid forces were reduced by performing an aLDT.
Given the favorable effect of the aLDT on shoulder kinematics in this dynamic shoulder model, performing an aLDT may be considered as a treatment option in patients with irreparable SSC-D.
在患有无法修复的肩胛下肌缺损(SSC-D)且无严重骨关节炎的年轻患者中,前锯肌转移(aLDT)已被提议作为恢复前后肌肉力量偶联以恢复足够肩部功能的治疗选择。然而,关于 aLDT 对盂肱关节运动学的生物力学影响的证据仍然很少。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是使用动态肩部模型来研究 aLDT 对模拟 SSC-D 模型中盂肱关节外展运动范围、肱骨头向上迁移(SM)和累积三角肌力(cDF)的影响。假设 aLDT 通过重建不足的前后力偶来恢复正常的肩部运动学。
对照实验室研究。
使用经过验证的肩部模拟器对 8 个新鲜冷冻的尸体肩部进行了测试。通过三维运动跟踪比较了 3 种状态下的盂肱关节外展角度(gAA)、SM 和 cDF:(1)正常,(2)SSC-D,(3)aLDT。gAA 和 SM 通过三维运动跟踪进行测量,而 cDF 通过与执行器相连的测力传感器在动态外展运动过程中实时记录。
SSC-D 显著降低了 gAA(Δ-9.8°;95%置信区间,-14.1°至-5.5°;<0.001)并显示出明显的 SM 增加(Δ2.0mm;95%置信区间,0.9 至 3.1mm;=0.003),而与正常状态相比,cDF 相似(Δ7.8N;95%置信区间,-9.2 至 24.7N;=0.586)。进行 aLDT 后,gAA 显著增加(Δ3.8°;95%置信区间,1.8°至 5.7°;<0.001),而与 SSC-D 相比,cDF(Δ-36.1N;95%置信区间,-48.7 至-23.7N;<0.001)显著降低。对于 aLDT,没有观察到前脱位。然而,aLDT 无法恢复正常的 gAA(Δ-6.1°;95%置信区间,-8.9°至-3.2°;<0.001)。
在这项尸体研究中,进行不可修复的肩胛下肌不足的 aLDT 恢复了前后力偶,并防止了肱骨头向上和向前迁移,从而改善了盂肱关节运动学。此外,通过进行 aLDT 降低了代偿性三角肌力。
鉴于 aLDT 在这种动态肩部模型中对肩部运动学的有利影响,对于患有不可修复的 SSC-D 的患者,进行 aLDT 可能被视为一种治疗选择。