Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8927-8934. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09341-4. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
Liver parenchymal transection is the most critical step for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). Ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic) is a common used energy instrument in LLR; however, it is only recommended for superficial layer transection and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) is recommended for deep layer dissection. We herein introduce the "Harmonic mimic CUSA" technique for LLR.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent LLR using CUSA or the "Harmonic mimic CUSA" for parenchymal transection between July 2018 and October 2020 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Observation indicators included general demographic information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, complication rate, hospital stay, and the costs. Perioperative data was compared between the two groups by propensity score matching analysis (PSM).
A total of 298 patients, including 192 in Harmonic group and 106 in CUSA group, were enrolled in this study. After a 1:1 PSM, 99 patients using "Harmonic mimic CUSA" were matched with 99 patients via CUSA for parenchymal transection in LLRs. The Harmonic group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (mean, 150 ml vs. 250 ml, P < 0.001), shorter operative time (mean 170 min vs. 250 min, P < 0.001) and less costs (mean 6723$ vs. 8307$, P < 0.001). The conversion to laparotomy, length of postoperative hospital stay, complications were comparable between the two groups. There perioperative mortality was nil.
The "Harmonic mimic CUSA" technique is safe, simple and feasible for LLR, which may be an alternative to CUSA for LLR.
肝实质离断是腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)最关键的步骤。超声刀(Harmonic)是 LLR 中常用的能量器械;然而,它仅推荐用于浅层离断,而 Cavitron 超声外科吸引器(CUSA)则推荐用于深层解剖。我们在此介绍用于 LLR 的“Harmonic 模拟 CUSA”技术。
我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 10 月在四川大学华西医院接受 CUSA 或“Harmonic 模拟 CUSA”进行肝实质离断的 LLR 患者的病历。观察指标包括一般人口统计学信息、手术时间、术中出血量、输血量、并发症发生率、住院时间和费用。通过倾向评分匹配分析(PSM)比较两组围手术期数据。
共纳入 298 例患者,其中 Harmonic 组 192 例,CUSA 组 106 例。经 1:1PSM 后,99 例采用“Harmonic 模拟 CUSA”的患者与 99 例采用 CUSA 进行 LLR 肝实质离断的患者相匹配。Harmonic 组术中出血量明显较少(平均 150ml 比 250ml,P<0.001),手术时间较短(平均 170min 比 250min,P<0.001),费用较低(平均 6723 美元比 8307 美元,P<0.001)。两组中转开腹、术后住院时间、并发症发生率无差异。两组围手术期死亡率均为零。
“Harmonic 模拟 CUSA”技术安全、简单、可行,可作为 LLR 中 CUSA 的替代方法。