Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41122, Modena, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09556-7.
Current guidelines consider T-DM1 the standard 2 line therapy for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients following trastuzumab (T) + pertuzumab (P) and taxane 1 line treatment. Despite this, there are no prospective studies supporting this sequence.
We performed a meta-analysis using real world data to determine the efficacy of T-DM1 after 1 line TP in HER2 positive MBC patients. We used a random-effect model to find differences in the rate of 1-year progression free survival (PFS) between TP pre-treated population and the EMILIA phase III pivotal trial.
Seven studies were eligible. The meta-analysis showed a combined 1-year PFS risk difference for T-DM1 efficacy after TP in 2 or more lines of -0.122, with lower and upper limits of -0.253 and 0.010, respectively (p = 0.07), with low heterogeneity among studies (I 0.01%, p = 0.836). Considering the four studies on T-DM1 in 2 line setting, 1-year PFS risk was -0.034 (95% CI -0.207 - 0,139; p = 0.701) (I 0.01%, p = 0.91).
Overall, the efficacy of T-DM1 after TP seems to be similar to that previously reported in the EMILIA trial. In the second line setting, data are not mature enough to confirm T-DM1 efficacy in TP pre-treated population.
目前的指南认为,对于接受曲妥珠单抗(T)+帕妥珠单抗(P)和紫杉烷一线治疗后 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者,T-DM1 是二线标准治疗。尽管如此,尚无支持这种治疗顺序的前瞻性研究。
我们使用真实世界数据进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定在 HER2 阳性 MBC 患者中接受一线 TP 治疗后使用 T-DM1 的疗效。我们使用随机效应模型来比较 TP 预处理人群和 EMILIA 三期关键试验中 1 年无进展生存率(PFS)的差异。
有 7 项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,在二线或以上治疗线中,TP 预处理人群使用 T-DM1 的 1 年 PFS 风险差异为-0.122,下限和上限分别为-0.253 和 0.010(p=0.07),各研究之间的异质性较低(I 0.01%,p=0.836)。考虑到四项关于 T-DM1 在二线治疗中的研究,1 年 PFS 风险为-0.034(95%CI -0.207 至 0.139;p=0.701)(I 0.01%,p=0.91)。
总体而言,TP 后使用 T-DM1 的疗效似乎与 EMILIA 试验中先前报道的相似。在二线治疗中,数据尚不成熟,无法确认 TP 预处理人群中 T-DM1 的疗效。