Fahrenberg J, Schneider H J, Safian P
Biol Psychol. 1987 Feb;24(1):49-66. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(87)90099-8.
Intra-individual variability in psychophysiological parameters of activation processes can be attributed to functional fluctuation and/or error of measurement. A repeated measurement design at intervals of about three weeks, three months and one-year duration, in which a laboratory-field comparison was made with respect to predictability of individual differences, provided data on a broad spectrum of physiological and psychological variables measured under various conditions. We investigated the reproducibility of commonly used laboratory measures in a sample of male students of physical education (N = 58). Results indicate that a hypothetical general trend component accounts for less than 10 percent of the total variance in a two-factorial ANOVA (Subjects X Replications). Stability coefficients based on raw scores (rest and strain scores) are relatively higher than those based on change scores. Stability of heart rate, pulse wave velocity, respiration rate during rest, mental arithmetic and cold pressor test and cardiovascular and respiratory parameters during ergometer exercise and 1000m run exceed the stability of blood pressure, parameters from impedance cardiography, eye blink and electrodermal activity during the respective laboratory conditions. The implications of such descriptive studies for the planning and evaluation of longitudinal studies and for selection of parameters depicting habitual dispositions in differential psychophysiological research are indicated.
激活过程中心理生理参数的个体内变异性可归因于功能波动和/或测量误差。采用约三周、三个月和一年的间隔重复测量设计,并在个体差异可预测性方面进行实验室与现场比较,获取了在各种条件下测量的广泛生理和心理变量的数据。我们对58名体育专业男学生样本中常用实验室测量方法的可重复性进行了研究。结果表明,在双因素方差分析(受试者×重复测量)中,假设的总体趋势成分占总方差的比例不到10%。基于原始分数(静息和应激分数)的稳定性系数相对高于基于变化分数的稳定性系数。静息、心算和冷加压试验期间心率、脉搏波速度、呼吸频率以及测力计运动和1000米跑步期间心血管和呼吸参数的稳定性超过了相应实验室条件下血压、阻抗心动图参数、眨眼和皮肤电活动的稳定性。指出了此类描述性研究对纵向研究的规划和评估以及对差异心理生理学研究中描述习惯性倾向的参数选择的意义。