• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time Management in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: When Do We Need to Change the Crossing Strategy?慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的时间管理:我们何时需要改变穿刺策略?
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 May;38(3):334-340. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20211204A.
2
The predictors of successful percutaneous coronary intervention in ostial left anterior descending artery chronic total occlusion.左前降支开口处慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功的预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):E30-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25514. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Use of Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts for Retrograde Recanalization of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Insights From a Multicenter Registry.大隐静脉旁路移植术用于冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变逆向再通:来自多中心注册研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Jun;28(6):218-24.
4
The Retrograde Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Technical Analysis and Procedural Outcomes.逆行技术在慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:技术分析与临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2748-2762. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.031.
5
The Hybrid Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Update From the PROGRESS CTO Registry.Hybrid 策略在慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:来自 PROGRESS CTO 注册研究的更新。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 23;11(14):1325-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Exploring indicators of success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention with Stingray system-based antegrade dissection re-entry: Insights from retrospective analysis.基于 Stingray 系统正向夹层重入的慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功指标的探索:回顾性分析的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Dec;102(7):1210-1221. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30889. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
7
Collateral grading systems in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions.逆行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的侧支分级系统。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):844-856. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30812. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
8
Primary vs Secondary Retrograde Approach in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉介入治疗中初次与二次逆行入路的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Sep;34(9):E672-E677. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00059. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
Impact of crossing technique on the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.交叉技术对慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间围手术期心肌梗死发生率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;88(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26505. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
10
Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion Performed by Highly Experienced Japanese Specialists: The First Report From the Japanese CTO-PCI Expert Registry.日本经验丰富的专家行慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:日本 CTO-PCI 专家登记处的首次报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 13;10(21):2144-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Algorithm for Treating Chronic Total Coronary Artery Occlusion.一种治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞的新算法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 12;74(19):2392-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1049.
2
Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462.
3
Reply: Strong Bias Toward Performing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion Despite Lack of Important Benefit at a Very High Cost and Risk to the Patient.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 13;11(15):1541-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.015.
4
Percutaneous Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Part 1: Rationale and Outcomes.经皮冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的治疗 第1部分:原理与结果
Interv Cardiol. 2014 Aug;9(3):195-200. doi: 10.15420/icr.2014.9.3.195.
5
Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Controversies.慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉介入治疗:证据与争议
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 12;7(2):e006732. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006732.
6
Guidewire and microcatheter utilization patterns during antegrade wire escalation in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a contemporary multicenter registry.慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中导丝升级过程中的导丝和微导管使用模式:来自当代多中心注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 1;89(4):E90-E98. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26568. Epub 2016 May 17.
7
Theory and practical based approach to chronic total occlusions.基于理论与实践的慢性完全闭塞病变治疗方法。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 9;16:33. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0209-3.
8
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry.基于日本逆向技术高峰注册研究,根据术者经验比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;87(6):1027-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26354. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
9
Application and outcomes of a hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in a contemporary multicenter US registry.美国当代多中心注册研究中慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗混合方法的应用及结果
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;198:222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.093. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
Clinical Utility of the Japan-Chronic Total Occlusion Score in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: Results from a Multicenter Registry.日本慢性完全闭塞评分在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞介入治疗中的临床应用:多中心注册研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002171.

慢性完全闭塞性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的时间管理:我们何时需要改变穿刺策略?

Time Management in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: When Do We Need to Change the Crossing Strategy?

作者信息

Khelimskii Dmitrii, Badoian Aram, Baranov Aleksey, Krestyaninov Oleg, Ponomarev Dmitrii

机构信息

Department of Invasive Cardiology, Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Russia.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2022 May;38(3):334-340. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20211204A.

DOI:10.6515/ACS.202205_38(3).20211204A
PMID:35673341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most complex chronic total occlusions (CTOs) require the utilization of multiple recanalization strategies. However, data on wire manipulation time within CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the impact of crossover time between crossing strategies on CTO PCI technical success.

METHODS

A total of 1026 patients admitted to our center between 2013 and 2019 for CTO PCI were assessed, of whom 143 were included for analysis. In these patients, the primary antegrade approach was changed to retrograde within one procedure. The crossover time between strategies remained at the operator's decision.

RESULTS

In most cases the target vessel was the right coronary artery (72%), followed by the left anterior descending (18.2%) and left circumflex (9.1%) arteries. The mean J-CTO score was 2.1 ± 1.1. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds of technical success associated with various crossover times. The results showed that 33 minutes was the threshold of the initial timing at which to review crossover of antegrade to retrograde recanalization of CTO. The odds of technical success with earlier crossover were 3.4 times higher [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3 to 8.6]. The chances of success reduced by 3% for every 1 minute longer than the threshold time (odds ratio: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Crossover to the retrograde approach should be considered no later than 33 minutes after antegrade wire manipulation in order to maintain the maximum chances of final technical success.

摘要

背景

大多数复杂慢性完全闭塞病变(CTO)需要采用多种再通策略。然而,关于CTO经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中导丝操作时间的数据有限。

目的

我们试图研究不同穿刺策略之间的转换时间对CTO PCI技术成功率的影响。

方法

对2013年至2019年期间因CTO PCI入住我们中心的1026例患者进行评估,其中143例纳入分析。在这些患者中,主要的正向入路在一次手术中改为逆向入路。策略之间的转换时间由术者决定。

结果

在大多数情况下,靶血管为右冠状动脉(72%),其次是左前降支(18.2%)和左旋支(9.1%)。平均J-CTO评分为2.1±1.1。采用逻辑回归分析评估不同转换时间与技术成功的关联概率。结果显示,33分钟是评估CTO正向至逆向再通转换的初始时间阈值。转换时间越早,技术成功的概率高3.4倍[95%置信区间(CI):1.3至8.6]。超过阈值时间每延长1分钟,成功几率降低3%(优势比:0.97;95%CI:0.94至0.99,p=0.05)。

结论

为了保持最终技术成功的最大几率,应在正向导丝操作后不迟于33分钟考虑转换为逆向入路。