Christopoulos Georgios, Wyman R Michael, Alaswad Khaldoon, Karmpaliotis Dimitri, Lombardi William, Grantham J Aaron, Yeh Robert W, Jaffer Farouc A, Cipher Daisha J, Rangan Bavana V, Christakopoulos Georgios E, Kypreos Megan A, Lembo Nicholas, Kandzari David, Garcia Santiago, Thompson Craig A, Banerjee Subhash, Brilakis Emmanouil S
From the VA North Texas Health Care System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (G.C., B.V.R., G.E.C., S.B., E.S.B.); Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, CA (R.M.W.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (K.A.); Columbia University, New York, NY (D.K.); University of Washington, Seattle, WA (W.L.); Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.G.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (R.W.Y., F.A.J.); College of Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX (D.J.C.); Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX (M.A.K.); Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA (N.L., D.K.); Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN (S.G.); and Boston Scientific, Natick, MA (C.A.T.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(7):e002171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002171.
The performance of the Japan-chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score in predicting success and efficiency of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention has received limited study.
We examined the records of 650 consecutive patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention between 2011 and 2014 at 6 experienced centers in the United States. Six hundred and fifty-seven lesions were classified as easy (J-CTO=0), intermediate (J-CTO=1), difficult (J-CTO=2), and very difficult (J-CTO≥3). The impact of the J-CTO score on technical success and procedure time was evaluated with univariable logistic and linear regression, respectively. The performance of the logistic regression model was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and receiver operator characteristic curves. Antegrade wiring techniques were used more frequently in easy lesions (97%) than very difficult lesions (58%), whereas the retrograde approach became more frequent with increased lesion difficulty (41% for very difficult lesions versus 13% for easy lesions). The logistic regression model for technical success demonstrated satisfactory calibration and discrimination (P for Hosmer-Lemeshow =0.743 and area under curve =0.705). The J-CTO score was associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of technical failure (odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.52-2.80, P<0.001). Procedure time increased by ≈20 minutes for every 1-point increase of the J-CTO score (regression coefficient 22.33, 95% confidence interval 17.45-27.22, P<0.001).
J-CTO score was strongly associated with final success and efficiency in this study, supporting its expanded use in CTO interventions.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02061436.
日本慢性完全闭塞病变(J-CTO)评分在预测慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的成功率和效率方面的研究有限。
我们研究了2011年至2014年间在美国6个经验丰富的中心连续接受慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的650例患者的记录。657处病变被分类为简单(J-CTO=0)、中等(J-CTO=1)、困难(J-CTO=2)和非常困难(J-CTO≥3)。分别采用单变量逻辑回归和线性回归评估J-CTO评分对技术成功率和手术时间的影响。采用Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量和受试者工作特征曲线评估逻辑回归模型的性能。与非常困难的病变(58%)相比,简单病变(97%)更频繁地使用正向导丝技术,而随着病变难度增加,逆向技术的使用频率更高(非常困难的病变为41%,简单病变为13%)。技术成功的逻辑回归模型显示出良好的校准和区分能力(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验的P值=0.743,曲线下面积=0.705)。J-CTO评分与技术失败几率增加2倍相关(比值比2.04,95%置信区间1.52-2.80,P<0.001)。J-CTO评分每增加1分,手术时间增加约20分钟(回归系数22.33,95%置信区间17.45-27.22,P<0.001)。
在本研究中,J-CTO评分与最终成功率和效率密切相关,支持其在慢性完全闭塞病变介入治疗中的广泛应用。