• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入不平等来源的重新分配与观念

Redistribution and beliefs about the source of income inequality.

作者信息

Valero Vanessa

机构信息

Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

CeDEx, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):876-901. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8
PMID:35673600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165271/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Previous literature demonstrates that beliefs about the determinants of income inequality play a major role in individual support for income redistribution. This study investigates how people form beliefs regarding the extent to which work versus luck determines income inequality. Specifically, I examine whether people form self-serving beliefs to justify supporting personally advantageous redistributive policies. I use a laboratory experiment where I directly measure beliefs and manipulate the incentives to engage in self-deception. I first replicate earlier results demonstrating that (1) people attribute income inequality to work when they receive a high income and to luck when they receive a low income and (2) their beliefs about the source of income inequality influence their preferences over redistributive policies. However, I do not find that people's beliefs about the causes of income inequality are further influenced by self-serving motivations based on a desire to justify favorable redistributive policies. I conclude that, in my experiment, self-serving beliefs about the causes of income inequality are driven primarily by overconfidence and self-image concerns and not to justify favorable redistributive policies.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8.

摘要

未标注

以往文献表明,对收入不平等决定因素的看法在个人对收入再分配的支持中起主要作用。本研究调查人们如何形成关于工作与运气在多大程度上决定收入不平等的看法。具体而言,我研究人们是否形成自利性信念,以证明支持对个人有利的再分配政策是合理的。我采用实验室实验,直接测量信念并操纵进行自我欺骗的动机。我首先复制了早期结果,表明:(1)人们在获得高收入时将收入不平等归因于工作,而在获得低收入时归因于运气;(2)他们对收入不平等来源的信念影响他们对再分配政策的偏好。然而,我没有发现人们对收入不平等原因的信念会因出于证明有利再分配政策合理的愿望而产生的自利动机而进一步受到影响。我得出结论,在我的实验中,关于收入不平等原因的自利性信念主要由过度自信和自我形象关注驱动,而非为了证明有利再分配政策合理。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/346295cc364f/10683_2021_9733_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/a0fb264d9a3a/10683_2021_9733_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/11bfdcef1d51/10683_2021_9733_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/8713aceaf5e1/10683_2021_9733_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/1914753ba444/10683_2021_9733_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/8bf6b6ec29be/10683_2021_9733_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/346295cc364f/10683_2021_9733_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/a0fb264d9a3a/10683_2021_9733_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/11bfdcef1d51/10683_2021_9733_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/8713aceaf5e1/10683_2021_9733_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/1914753ba444/10683_2021_9733_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/8bf6b6ec29be/10683_2021_9733_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd9d/9165271/346295cc364f/10683_2021_9733_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Redistribution and beliefs about the source of income inequality.收入不平等来源的重新分配与观念
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):876-901. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Deliberating Inequality: A Blueprint for Studying the Social Formation of Beliefs about Economic Inequality.思考不平等:研究关于经济不平等信念的社会形成的蓝图。
Soc Justice Res. 2022;35(4):379-400. doi: 10.1007/s11211-022-00389-0. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality.对再分配的态度以及对不平等的看法和信念之间的相互作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):111-136. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12326. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest.最富有的人对收入的选择性不敏感。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 17;3(9):pgae333. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae333. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
The Two Faces of Support for Redistribution in Colombia: Taxing the Wealthy or Assisting People in Need.哥伦比亚对再分配支持的两面:对富人征税还是帮助有需要的人。
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 27;7:773378. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.773378. eCollection 2022.
6
The mediating role of attributions of poverty and wealth in the relationship between perceptions of economic inequality and redistribution preferences.贫困与财富归因在经济不平等认知与再分配偏好关系中的中介作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2025;165(3):421-436. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2024.2396345. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
7
Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution.不平等厌恶感预测了对公共和私人再分配的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2401445121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401445121. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
8
Reducing economic inequality is 'just right': Moral conviction predicts support for redistributive government policies.减少经济不平等“恰到好处”:道德信念预示着对政府再分配政策的支持。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):1076-1096. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12620. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
Preferences for Income Redistribution in Unequal Contexts: Changes in Latin America Between 2008 and 2018.不平等背景下的收入再分配偏好:2008年至2018年拉丁美洲的变化
Front Sociol. 2022 May 4;7:806458. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.806458. eCollection 2022.
10
Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence.收入流动会增强人们对收入不平等的容忍度:跨国和实验证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):373-80. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635596.

本文引用的文献

1
Humans expect generosity.人类期望慷慨大方。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 14;7:42446. doi: 10.1038/srep42446.
2
Capital in the twenty-first century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes.《21世纪的资本:资本与社会阶级历史的多维度研究方法》
Br J Sociol. 2014 Dec;65(4):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12115.
3
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
4
Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias.归因中是否存在普遍的积极偏差?对自我服务归因偏差中个体、发展和文化差异的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):711-47. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.
5
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.采用单反应序贯法测量效用。
Behav Sci. 1964 Jul;9(3):226-32. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830090304.
6
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.成就动机与情感的归因理论。
Psychol Rev. 1985 Oct;92(4):548-73.