Kattoor Jayasree, Kamal Meherbano M
Department of Pathology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Cytojournal. 2022 Apr 30;19:30. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_03_10_2021. eCollection 2022.
The unequivocal and easily recognizable entities of LSIL and HSIL pose no diagnostic problems for a trained eye. However, when the defining morphologic features are either qualitatively or quantitatively insufficient, it is then that the borderline category of "Atypical Squamous cells" (ASC) may have to be used. Scant and suboptimal preparations (mainly in conventional smears) are the common causes that hinder confident decision-making. The binary classification of the ASC category has been retained in The Bethesda System 2014. It includes ASC of undetermined significance (ASC-US) when the atypia is seen in mature cells and ASC-cannot rule out high-grade lesion (ASC-H) when borderline changes are seen in less mature, smaller metaplastic cells or smaller basaloid cells. There are many criticisms of the ASC category. The major one is its subjective and inconsistent applications and the low interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility. However, studies have shown that if we eliminate ASC-US, the LSIL rate will increase. If ASC-H is eliminated, the chances of detecting true lesions are reduced. Hence, there are strong reasons to retain the ASC category. The usual problems leading to the categorization of such cells as atypical are hyperchromasia beyond that acceptable as reactive change; abnormal chromatin pattern that is not overt dyskaryosis; minor variations in nuclear shape; and membrane outlines. Qualifying the atypical cells precisely in one of the categories has bearing on the clinical management and follow-up of the patient. Surveillance of women under the ASC-US category is either by repeat smear at 6 months and 1 year or by reflex human papillomaviruses DNA testing. Women with a Pap smear interpretation of ASC-H are directed to undergo immediate colposcopy. This article describes in detail the morphologic features of the ASC category, doubts about the correct interpretation of the chromatin pattern of the cells in question, and the differential diagnosis between normal, reactive, or inflammatory conditions, and LSIL/HSIL.
低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)和高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)明确且易于识别,对于训练有素的人来说不存在诊断问题。然而,当定义性的形态学特征在质量或数量上不足时,就可能不得不使用“非典型鳞状细胞”(ASC)这一边界类别。涂片稀少和质量欠佳(主要在传统涂片检查中)是阻碍做出可靠诊断的常见原因。ASC类别在《2014年贝塞斯达系统》中仍保留二元分类。它包括意义不明确的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-US),即非典型性见于成熟细胞时;以及不能排除高级别病变的非典型鳞状细胞(ASC-H),即边界性改变见于不太成熟、较小的化生细胞或较小的基底样细胞时。对ASC类别存在诸多批评。主要的一点是其应用主观且不一致,观察者间和观察者内的可重复性低。然而,研究表明,如果剔除ASC-US,LSIL的检出率将会增加。如果剔除ASC-H,检测出真正病变的几率就会降低。因此,有充分理由保留ASC类别。导致将此类细胞归类为非典型的常见问题包括超出反应性改变可接受范围的核深染;并非明显核异常的异常染色质模式;核形状的细微变化;以及细胞膜轮廓。准确地将非典型细胞归为其中某一类别对于患者的临床管理和随访具有重要意义。ASC-US类别的女性监测方法要么是在6个月和1年时重复涂片检查,要么是进行人乳头瘤病毒DNA检测。巴氏涂片解读为ASC-H的女性需立即接受阴道镜检查。本文详细描述了ASC类别的形态学特征、对所讨论细胞染色质模式正确解读的疑问,以及正常、反应性或炎症性病变与LSIL/HSIL之间的鉴别诊断。