• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用多重巢式 PCR 检测 mpt64(Rv1980c)和 IS6110 对泌尿生殖系统结核的诊断:与多重 PCR 和 GeneXpert® MTB/RIF 的比较。

Diagnosis of urogenital tuberculosis by multiplex-nested PCR targeting mpt64 (Rv1980c) and IS6110: comparison with multiplex PCR and GeneXpert® MTB/RIF.

机构信息

Centre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022 Oct;75(4):857-868. doi: 10.1111/lam.13758. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1111/lam.13758
PMID:35673975
Abstract

A multiplex-nested PCR (M-nested PCR) targeting mpt64 (Rv1980c) + IS6110 was designed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) DNA within urine (n = 35), endometrial biopsies (n = 22) and menstrual blood (n = 3) of male/female UGTB patients, and results were compared with M-PCR using the same targets. Detection limit of the purified Mtb DNA was found to be 1 fg by M-nested PCR, which was 10 -fold lower than M-PCR. Moreover, sensitivities of 100% and 81·8% were obtained in confirmed (n = 5) and clinically suspected UGTB (n = 55) cases, respectively, by M-nested PCR, with a specificity of 97·1% (n = 70). Sensitivities attained by M-nested PCR were significantly higher (p < 0·05) than M-PCR in both clinically suspected and total UGTB (n = 60) cases. To confirm the true PCR-negative results, an internal amplification control, that is, human β-globin gene (hbb) was incorporated in the M-nested PCR/M-PCR assays, wherein all the clinical specimens (positive/negative for mpt64/IS6110) were found to be positive for hbb. Some UGTB specimens (n = 35) were also subjected to GeneXpert® MTB/RIF assay that revealed a significantly lower (p < 0·001) sensitivity (17·1 vs 88·6%) than M-nested PCR, although high specificity (100%) was attained with GeneXpert. After validating the results in a higher number of UGTB specimens, our M-nested PCR may be translated into an attractive diagnostic kit.

摘要

一种针对 mpt64(Rv1980c)+IS6110 的多重巢式 PCR(M-nested PCR)被设计用于检测男性/女性 UGTB 患者的尿液(n=35)、子宫内膜活检(n=22)和月经血(n=3)中的结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)DNA,并将结果与使用相同靶标的 M-PCR 进行比较。通过 M-nested PCR 发现纯化的 Mtb DNA 的检测限为 1 fg,比 M-PCR 低 10 倍。此外,通过 M-nested PCR 在确诊(n=5)和临床疑似 UGTB(n=55)病例中分别获得了 100%和 81.8%的灵敏度,特异性为 97.1%(n=70)。在临床疑似和总计 UGTB(n=60)病例中,M-nested PCR 的灵敏度均明显高于 M-PCR(p<0.05)。为了确认真正的 PCR 阴性结果,在 M-nested PCR/M-PCR 检测中加入了内部扩增对照,即人β-珠蛋白基因(hbb),所有临床标本(mpt64/IS6110 阳性/阴性)均为 hbb 阳性。一些 UGTB 标本(n=35)也进行了 GeneXpert® MTB/RIF 检测,其灵敏度明显低于 M-nested PCR(17.1%比 88.6%,p<0.001),尽管 GeneXpert 具有很高的特异性(100%)。在对更多数量的 UGTB 标本进行验证后,我们的 M-nested PCR 可能会转化为一种有吸引力的诊断试剂盒。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of urogenital tuberculosis by multiplex-nested PCR targeting mpt64 (Rv1980c) and IS6110: comparison with multiplex PCR and GeneXpert® MTB/RIF.采用多重巢式 PCR 检测 mpt64(Rv1980c)和 IS6110 对泌尿生殖系统结核的诊断:与多重 PCR 和 GeneXpert® MTB/RIF 的比较。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022 Oct;75(4):857-868. doi: 10.1111/lam.13758. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Identification of mycobacterial MPT-64 and ESAT-6 proteins in urogenital tuberculosis patients by real-time immuno-PCR.实时免疫-PCR 法检测泌尿生殖系结核患者分枝杆菌 MPT-64 和 ESAT-6 蛋白。
Future Microbiol. 2022 Jul;17:829-842. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2022-0037. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Comparative evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and multiplex PCR targeting mpb64 and IS6110 for the diagnosis of pleural TB.GeneXpert MTB/RIF 与多重 PCR 检测 mpb64 和 IS6110 对胸腔结核的诊断价值比较。
Future Microbiol. 2018 Mar;13:407-413. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2017-0147. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Comparative Study of GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay and Multiplex PCR Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测法与多重PCR检测法对疑似肺结核患者结核分枝杆菌直接检测的比较研究
Curr Microbiol. 2017 Sep;74(9):1026-1032. doi: 10.1007/s00284-017-1279-x. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
Diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis: multi-targeted loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay versus multiplex PCR.骨关节结核的诊断:多靶标环介导等温扩增检测法与多重 PCR 检测法的比较。
Future Microbiol. 2021 Sep;16:935-948. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2021-0030. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Current updates in diagnosis of male urogenital tuberculosis.男性泌尿生殖系统结核的诊断现状更新。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2021 Oct;19(10):1175-1190. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1902305. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Comparison of the Purelyse® - IS6110 nested PCR with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test in clinical samples with suspected tuberculosis.在疑似结核病临床样本中,将Purelyse® - IS6110巢式PCR与Xpert® MTB/RIF检测进行比较。
J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Sep;152:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from non-tubercular mycobacteria by nested multiplex PCR targeting IS6110, MTP40 and 32kD alpha antigen encoding gene fragments.通过靶向IS6110、MTP40和32kDα抗原编码基因片段的巢式多重PCR鉴别结核分枝杆菌复合群与非结核分枝杆菌。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 12;16:123. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1450-1.
9
Comparative Study of a Real-Time PCR Assay Targeting senX3-regX3 versus Other Molecular Strategies Commonly Used in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.针对senX3-regX3的实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测法与结核病诊断常用其他分子策略的比较研究
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143025. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with an IS6110-TaqMan real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens.比较 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测与 IS6110-TaqMan 实时 PCR 检测在呼吸道和非呼吸道标本中直接检测结核分枝杆菌的效果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 May;49(5):1772-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02157-10. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of genitourinary tuberculosis: detection of mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan and MPT-64 biomarkers within urine extracellular vesicles by nano-based immuno-PCR assay.基于纳米免疫 PCR 检测法的尿细胞外囊泡中分枝杆菌脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖和 MPT-64 生物标志物检测在泌尿生殖系统结核诊断中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 18;13(1):11560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38740-3.