• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种多层次、基于步骤的评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术训练中程序效率进展的模型:使用“潮涨潮落”和“珍珠串”概念进行结构化评估。

A multilevel, step-based model to evaluate progress in procedure efficiency for laparoscopic appendicectomy in surgical training: structured evaluation using 'ebb-and-flow' and 'string-of-pearls' concepts.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac071.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrac071
PMID:35674702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9176202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical training is aimed towards entrusted professional activity to obtain operative independence. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is performed early in training but except for simulators, real-life evaluation towards proficiency is scarce. The aim of this study was to model how each consecutive step may impact on the overall proficiency score for surgical trainees performing laparoscopic appendicectomy.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of laparoscopic appendicectomy performed by junior trainees (PGY1-4) under supervision and evaluated for each of eight steps. Each step was scored on a validated six-point performance scale and classified as 'fail', 'pass', or 'proficient'. Modelling was conducted with a multivariable regression model and artificial neural network model with a multilayer perceptron for the relationship between steps and overall performance.

RESULTS

Of 157 procedures, 97 (61.8 per cent) procedures were evaluated as 'proficient', 46 (29.3 per cent) were 'pass', and 14 (8.9 per cent) were 'fail'. In regression analyses, handling the mesoappendix was significantly associated with procedure proficiency, as were division of appendix, access to abdomen, and ability to handle the small bowel. The widest variation in operative flow was shown for steps involving mesoappendix and division of appendix, conceptualized in 'ebb-and-flow' and 'string-of-pearls' models. Sensitivity analyses for experience using 20 or fewer, 30 or fewer, or more than 30 procedures as cut-offs reproduced comparable results.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent stumbling blocks for junior trainees performing laparoscopic appendectomies can be conceptualized through novel models that identify steps deemed to be the most difficult to trainees with variable experience.

摘要

背景

外科培训旨在进行受托的专业活动,以获得手术独立性。腹腔镜阑尾切除术在培训早期进行,但除了模拟器之外,针对熟练程度的实际评估很少。本研究的目的是建立模型,以了解外科受训者进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术时,每个连续步骤如何影响整体熟练程度评分。

方法

这是一项对初级受训者(PGY1-4)进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的观察性队列研究,对每个手术的 8 个步骤进行评估。每个步骤均根据经过验证的 6 分绩效量表进行评分,并分为“失败”、“通过”或“熟练”。使用多变量回归模型和具有多层感知器的人工神经网络模型对步骤与整体绩效之间的关系进行建模。

结果

在 157 例手术中,97 例(61.8%)被评估为“熟练”,46 例(29.3%)为“通过”,14 例(8.9%)为“失败”。在回归分析中,处理阑尾系膜与手术熟练程度显著相关,阑尾的分离、腹部进入和处理小肠的能力也是如此。涉及阑尾系膜和阑尾分离的步骤在手术流程中变化最大,被概念化为“潮起潮落”和“珍珠串”模型。使用 20 次或更少、30 次或更少或超过 30 次手术作为截止值进行的敏感性分析产生了类似的结果。

结论

通过新颖的模型,可以将初级受训者进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术时遇到的一致障碍概念化,这些模型可以确定被认为是最具挑战性的步骤,并且根据受训者的经验不同,这些步骤也有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/b858cb2725e1/zrac071f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/165c21809a52/zrac071f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/d6b3e7cfa242/zrac071f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/056d902bc3e4/zrac071f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/797ed4bdd4e2/zrac071f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/b858cb2725e1/zrac071f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/165c21809a52/zrac071f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/d6b3e7cfa242/zrac071f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/056d902bc3e4/zrac071f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/797ed4bdd4e2/zrac071f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdfe/9176202/b858cb2725e1/zrac071f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A multilevel, step-based model to evaluate progress in procedure efficiency for laparoscopic appendicectomy in surgical training: structured evaluation using 'ebb-and-flow' and 'string-of-pearls' concepts.一种多层次、基于步骤的评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术训练中程序效率进展的模型:使用“潮涨潮落”和“珍珠串”概念进行结构化评估。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac071.
2
Deciphering the inflection points to achieve proficiency for each procedure step during training in laparoscopic appendicectomy.解析各手术步骤训练中的拐点以实现腹腔镜阑尾切除术的熟练掌握。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab084.
3
Internal and external factors affecting the performance score of surgical trainees doing laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, observational cohort study in a structured training programme.影响接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术培训的外科受训者绩效评分的内部和外部因素:一项在结构化培训计划中进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4939-4946. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11007-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
4
Short-term complications and long-term morbidity of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在全国队列中的短期并发症和长期发病率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9552. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——高级实习医生在无监督情况下手术与经验丰富的儿科外科医生手术的结果对比
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
Modified Lanz incision in appendicectomy - the surgical trainees best friend.改良兰兹切口在阑尾切除术中的应用——实习医生的最佳助手。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):56-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
Unsupervised laparoscopic appendicectomy by surgical trainees is safe and time-effective.外科实习生进行的无监督腹腔镜阑尾切除术是安全且省时有效的。
Asian J Surg. 2007 Jul;30(3):161-6. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(08)60016-0.
8
Comparison of Performance Score for Female and Male Residents in General Surgery Doing Supervised Real-Life Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is There a Norse Shield-Maiden Effect?普通外科住院医师接受监督下真实腹腔镜阑尾切除术的表现评分比较:是否存在北欧女战士效应?
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):997-1005. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05921-4. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
9
Randomized trial to examine procedure-to-procedure transfer in laparoscopic simulator training.随机试验研究腹腔镜模拟器训练中的程序到程序转移。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9966. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
10
Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a trainee's perspective.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一名实习生的视角
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Jul;77(4):259-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Internal and external factors affecting the performance score of surgical trainees doing laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, observational cohort study in a structured training programme.影响接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术培训的外科受训者绩效评分的内部和外部因素:一项在结构化培训计划中进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4939-4946. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11007-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review.结直肠外科和阑尾切除术的培训和评估-系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):597-608. doi: 10.1111/codi.16905. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
3
Emergency general surgery in BJS Open-papers of note in 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and clinical implementation of a structured, simulation-based training programme in laparoscopic appendectomy: description, validation and evaluation.腹腔镜阑尾切除术结构化模拟培训计划的开发与临床实施:描述、验证与评估
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 Jun 2;7(6):517-523. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000728. eCollection 2021.
2
Deciphering the inflection points to achieve proficiency for each procedure step during training in laparoscopic appendicectomy.解析各手术步骤训练中的拐点以实现腹腔镜阑尾切除术的熟练掌握。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab084.
3
Chief Resident Indirect Supervision in Training Safety Study: Is a Chief Resident General Surgery Service Safe for Patients?
《北京医学》2022年值得关注的急诊普通外科领域论文
BJS Open. 2023 Jan 6;7(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad004.
住院总医师间接监督培训安全研究:普通外科住院总医师服务对患者安全吗?
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e145-e153. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Comparison of Performance Score for Female and Male Residents in General Surgery Doing Supervised Real-Life Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is There a Norse Shield-Maiden Effect?普通外科住院医师接受监督下真实腹腔镜阑尾切除术的表现评分比较:是否存在北欧女战士效应?
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):997-1005. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05921-4. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Trainee Autonomy in Minimally Invasive General Surgery in the United States: Establishing a National Benchmark.美国微创普通外科培训学员的自主权:建立全国性基准。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov-Dec;77(6):e52-e62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.033. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Competency-based Surgical Training and Entrusted Professional Activities - Perfect Match or a Procrustean Bed?基于胜任力的外科培训与委托专业活动——完美匹配还是普罗克汝斯忒斯之床?
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):e173-e175. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004521.
7
Appendectomy as Teaching Operation: No Compromise in Safety-An Audit of 17,106 Patients.作为教学手术的阑尾切除术:安全方面绝不妥协——对17106例患者的审计
J Surg Educ. 2021 Mar-Apr;78(2):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Current technical surgical practice of emergency appendicectomy: a cross-sectional survey of surgical registrars in the UK.急诊阑尾切除术的当前技术手术实践:英国外科住院医师的横断面调查
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Oct;102(8):606-610. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0123. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory.触觉虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术学习曲线轨迹的前瞻性队列研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1128-1134. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0332. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Development of a structured virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic appendicectomy.开发一种结构化的虚拟现实腹腔镜阑尾切除术课程。
Am J Surg. 2020 Apr;219(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 6.