Department of Surgery, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1135-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9552. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Laparoscopic appendicectomy has been proposed as the standard for surgical treatment of acute appendicitis, based on controversial evidence. This study compared outcomes after open and laparoscopic appendicectomy in a national, population-based cohort.
All patients who underwent open or intended laparoscopic appendicectomy in Sweden between 1992 and 2008 were identified from the Swedish National Patient Register. The outcomes were analysed according to intention to treat with multivariable adjustment for confounding factors and survival analytical techniques where appropriate.
A total of 169 896 patients underwent open (136 754) or intended laparoscopic (33 142) appendicectomy. The rate of intended laparoscopic appendicectomy increased from 3·8 per cent (425 of 11 175) in 1992 to 32·9 per cent (3066 of 9329) in 2008. Laparoscopy was used most frequently in middle-aged patients, women and patients with no co-morbidity. The rate of conversion from laparoscopy to open appendicectomy decreased from 75·3 per cent (320 of 425) in 1992 to 19·7 per cent (603 of 3066) in 2008. Conversion was more frequent in women and those with perforated appendicitis, and the rate increased with age and increasing co-morbidity. After adjustment for co-variables, compared with open appendicectomy, laparoscopy was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (by 0·06 days), a lower frequency of negative appendicectomy (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0·59; P < 0·001), wound infection (adjusted OR 0·54; P = 0·004) and wound rupture (adjusted OR 0·44; P = 0·010), but higher rates of intestinal injury (adjusted OR 1·32; P = 0·042), readmission (adjusted OR 1·10; P < 0·001), postoperative abdominal abscess (adjusted OR 1·58; P < 0·001) and urinary infection (adjusted OR 1·39; P = 0·020). Laparoscopy had a lower risk of postoperative small bowel obstruction during the first 2 years after surgery, but not thereafter.
The outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy showed a complex and contrasting pattern and small differences of limited clinical importance. The choice of surgical method therefore depends on the local situation, the surgeon's experience and the patient's preference.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术已被提议作为急性阑尾炎手术治疗的标准,这是基于有争议的证据。本研究在全国性的基于人群的队列中比较了开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果。
从瑞典国家患者登记处确定了 1992 年至 2008 年间接受开腹或计划行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的所有患者。根据意向治疗分析结果,并根据需要进行多变量调整混杂因素和生存分析技术。
共有 169896 例患者接受了开腹(136754 例)或计划行腹腔镜阑尾切除术(33142 例)。计划行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比例从 1992 年的 3.8%(425/11175)增加到 2008 年的 32.9%(3066/9329)。腹腔镜手术主要应用于中年患者、女性和无合并症的患者。从腹腔镜到开腹阑尾切除术的转换率从 1992 年的 75.3%(320/425)降至 2008 年的 19.7%(603/3066)。女性和穿孔性阑尾炎患者的转换率更高,且随年龄和合并症的增加而增加。在调整协变量后,与开腹阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜手术的住院时间更短(缩短 0.06 天),阴性阑尾切除的发生率更低(调整优势比(OR)0.59;P<0.001),切口感染的发生率更低(调整 OR 0.54;P=0.004),切口破裂的发生率更低(调整 OR 0.44;P=0.010),但肠损伤的发生率更高(调整 OR 1.32;P=0.042),再入院率更高(调整 OR 1.10;P<0.001),术后腹腔脓肿的发生率更高(调整 OR 1.58;P<0.001),尿路感染的发生率更高(调整 OR 1.39;P=0.020)。腹腔镜手术在术后 2 年内发生术后小肠梗阻的风险较低,但此后并非如此。
腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术的结果表现出复杂而相反的模式,且差异较小,临床意义有限。因此,手术方法的选择取决于当地情况、外科医生的经验和患者的偏好。