CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2034-2051. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02119-8. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Two-choice reaction tasks for which stimuli differ on irrelevant and relevant dimensions (e.g., Simon, flanker, and Stroop tasks) show congruency effects. The diffusion model for conflict tasks (DMC) has provided a quantitative account of the mechanisms underlying decisions in such conflict tasks, but it has not been applied to the congruency sequence effect (CSE) for which the congruency on the prior trial influences performance on the current trial. The present study expands analysis of the reaction time (RT) distributions reflected by delta plots to the CSE, and then extends the DMC to simulate the results. With increasing RT: (1) the spatial Simon effect was almost unchanged following congruent trials but initially became smaller and finally reversed following incongruent trials; (2) the arrow-based Simon effects increased following both congruent and incongruent trials, but more so for the former than the latter; (3) the flanker congruency effect varied quadratically following congruent trials but increased linearly following incongruent trials. These results were modeled by the CSE-DMC, extended from the DMC with two additional assumptions: (1) feature integration influences only the controlled processes; (2) following incongruent trials, the automatic process is weakened. The results fit better with the CSE-DMC than with two variants that separately had only one of the two additional assumptions. These findings indicate that the CSEs for different conflict tasks have disparate RT distributions and that these disparities are likely due to the controlled and automatic processes being influenced differently for each trial sequence.
在无关和相关维度上存在差异的二择一反应任务(例如 Simon、flanker 和 Stroop 任务)会产生一致效应。冲突任务的扩散模型(DMC)为这种冲突任务中的决策机制提供了定量解释,但它尚未应用于一致性序列效应(CSE),即前一次试验的一致性会影响当前试验的表现。本研究将 delta 图反映的反应时间(RT)分布的分析扩展到 CSE,然后扩展 DMC 以模拟结果。随着 RT 的增加:(1)在一致试验后,空间 Simon 效应几乎保持不变,但在不一致试验后最初变小,最后反转;(2)基于箭头的 Simon 效应在一致和不一致试验后都增加,但前者比后者增加更多;(3)flanker 一致性效应在一致试验后呈二次增加,但在不一致试验后呈线性增加。这些结果由 CSE-DMC 建模,该模型通过两个额外假设扩展了 DMC:(1)特征整合仅影响受控过程;(2)在不一致试验后,自动过程会减弱。与仅具有两个额外假设之一的两个变体相比,该结果与 CSE-DMC 更匹配。这些发现表明,不同冲突任务的 CSE 具有不同的 RT 分布,这些差异可能是由于每个试验序列中受控和自动过程受到不同的影响。