• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务相关信息和任务无关信息在一致性序列效应中的作用:将扩散模型应用于冲突任务

The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.

作者信息

Koob Valentin, Mackenzie Ian, Ulrich Rolf, Leuthold Hartmut, Janczyk Markus

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2023 Feb;140:101528. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101528. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101528
PMID:36584549
Abstract

In conflict tasks, such as the Simon, Eriksen flanker, or Stroop task, the congruency effect is often reduced after an incongruent compared to a congruent trial: the congruency sequence effect (CSE). It was suggested that the CSE may reflect increased processing of task-relevant information and/or suppression of task-irrelevant information after experiencing an incongruent relative to a congruent trial. In the present study, we contribute to this discussion by applying the Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (DMC) framework in the context of CSEs to flanker and Simon tasks. We argue that DMC independently models the task-relevant and task-irrelevant information and thus is a first good candidate for disentangling their unique contributions. As a first approach, we fitted DMC conjointly or separately to previously congruent or incongruent trials, using four empirical flanker and two Simon data sets. For the flanker task, we fitted the classical DMC version. For the Simon task, we fitted a generalized DMC version which allows the task-irrelevant information to undershoot when swinging back to zero. After considering the model fits, we present a second approach, where we implemented a cognitive control mechanism to simulate the influence of increased processing of task-relevant information or increased suppression of task-irrelevant information. Both approaches demonstrate that the suppression of task-irrelevant information is essential to create the typical CSE pattern. Increased processing of task-relevant information, however, could rarely describe the CSE accurately.

摘要

在冲突任务中,如西蒙任务、埃里克森侧翼任务或斯特鲁普任务,与一致试验相比,不一致试验后一致性效应通常会降低:即一致性序列效应(CSE)。有人认为,CSE可能反映了在经历不一致试验相对于一致试验后,与任务相关信息的处理增加和/或与任务无关信息的抑制增加。在本研究中,我们通过在CSE背景下将冲突任务扩散模型(DMC)框架应用于侧翼任务和西蒙任务,为这一讨论做出了贡献。我们认为,DMC独立地对与任务相关和与任务无关的信息进行建模,因此是解开它们独特贡献的第一个很好的候选模型。作为第一种方法,我们使用四个实证侧翼任务数据集和两个西蒙任务数据集,将DMC联合或分别拟合到先前的一致或不一致试验中。对于侧翼任务,我们拟合了经典的DMC版本。对于西蒙任务,我们拟合了一个广义的DMC版本,该版本允许与任务无关的信息在回摆到零时低于基线。在考虑模型拟合后,我们提出了第二种方法,即实施一种认知控制机制来模拟与任务相关信息处理增加或与任务无关信息抑制增加的影响。两种方法都表明,抑制与任务无关的信息对于创建典型的CSE模式至关重要。然而,与任务相关信息处理的增加很少能准确描述CSE。

相似文献

1
The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.任务相关信息和任务无关信息在一致性序列效应中的作用:将扩散模型应用于冲突任务
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Feb;140:101528. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101528. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
2
A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.一致性序列效应的扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2034-2051. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02119-8. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.奖励在 Simon 任务中的影响:与 Stroop 和 Eriksen 侧翼任务的差异和相似之处。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):949-959. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02563-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Multimodal Simon Effect: A Multimodal Extension of the Diffusion Model for Conflict Tasks.多模态西蒙效应:冲突任务扩散模型的多模态扩展
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;12:507. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00507. eCollection 2018.
5
A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.用于冲突任务的修正扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):1-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02288-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.魏斯曼、姜、埃格纳(2014年)的《无学习和记忆混淆的一致性序列效应的决定因素》的注册复制报告
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3777-3787. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02021-2.
7
Congruency sequence effect in cross-task context: evidence for dimension-specific modulation.跨任务情境中的一致性序列效应:维度特异性调制的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):617-27. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
8
Further Evidence for the Binding and Retrieval of Control-States From the Flanker Task.进一步的证据表明,控制状态从侧抑制任务中被绑定和检索。
Exp Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(5):264-273. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000529. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.在西蒙式任务中,通过抑制由任务无关信息触发的自动反应激活来进行控制过程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
10
Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.在混合 Stroop-Simon 任务中,交互一致性效应阻止了关于一致性序列效应的领域特异性或一般性的结论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 May;46(5):945-967. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000769. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhibition and updating share common resources: Bayesian evidence from signal detection theory and drift diffusion model.抑制与更新共享共同资源:来自信号检测理论和漂移扩散模型的贝叶斯证据。
Psychol Res. 2025 Jul 22;89(4):128. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02160-x.
2
Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.任务切换与跨任务干扰控制的建模支持了认知稳定性与灵活性的二维模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02712-7.
3
Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task.
空间选择的动态调制:侧翼任务中的在线和预期调整
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):794-814. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03026-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
4
Distractor-specific control adaptation in multidimensional environments.多维环境中特定干扰物的控制适应
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):534-553. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02088-z. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
5
Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.
6
A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC).关于冲突任务的修正扩散模型(RDMC)的评论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):690-704. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02574-5. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
7
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.模态与非模态认知:心理学各领域的一个统领性原则。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
How flexible is cognitive control? (Mouse) tracking conflict adaptation across context similarities.认知控制的灵活性如何?(鼠标)在上下文相似性中跟踪冲突适应。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):562-579. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01874-0. Epub 2023 Sep 28.