Suppr超能文献

非手术治疗适用于所有Ⅰ型胫骨髁间棘骨折患者吗?胫骨髁间棘研究兴趣小组的多中心研究。

Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1 Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research Interest Group.

作者信息

Shimberg Jilan L, Leska Tomasina M, Cruz Aristides I, Ellis Henry B, Patel Neeraj M, Yen Yi-Meng, Schmale Gregory A, Mistovich R Justin, Fabricant Peter D, Ganley Theodore J, Green Daniel W, Johnson Benjamin, Kushare Indranil, Lee R Jay, McKay Scott D, Milbrandt Todd A, Rhodes Jason, Sachleben Brant, Traver Jessica L

机构信息

Investigation performed at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 3;10(6):23259671221099572. doi: 10.1177/23259671221099572. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 1 tibial spine fractures are nondisplaced or ≤2 mm-displaced fractures of the tibial eminence and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion that are traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization.

HYPOTHESIS

Type 1 fractures do not carry a significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require advanced imaging or additional interventions aside from immobilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We reviewed 52 patients who were classified by their treating institution with type 1 tibial spine fractures. Patients aged ≤18 years with pretreatment plain radiographs and ≤ 1 year of follow-up were included. Pretreatment imaging was reviewed by 4 authors to assess classification agreement among the treating institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups to ensure that outcomes represented classic type 1 fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the 4 authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type 1 classification were assigned to the type 1+ (T1+) group; all other patients were assigned to the true type 1 (TT1) group. We evaluated the rates of pretreatment imaging, concomitant injuries, and need for operative interventions as well as treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria; 40 were in the TT1 group, while 8 were in the T1+ group, indicating less than universal agreement in the classification of these fractures. Overall, 12 (25%) underwent surgical treatment, and 12 (25%) had concomitant injuries. Also, 8 patients required additional surgical management including ACL reconstruction (n = 4), lateral meniscal repair (n = 2), lateral meniscectomy (n = 1), freeing an incarcerated medial meniscus (n = 1), and medial meniscectomy (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The classification of type 1 fractures can be challenging. Contrary to prior thought, a substantial number of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries. Overall, surgical management was performed in 25% of patients in our cohort.

摘要

背景

Ⅰ型胫骨髁间棘骨折是胫骨髁间隆起和前交叉韧带(ACL)附着处无移位或移位≤2mm的骨折,传统上采用制动的非手术方法治疗。

假设

Ⅰ型骨折不存在显著的相关损伤风险,因此除制动外不需要进行高级影像学检查或其他干预措施。

研究设计

病例系列研究;证据等级,4级。

方法

我们回顾了52例经其治疗机构分类为Ⅰ型胫骨髁间棘骨折的患者。纳入年龄≤18岁且有治疗前X线平片及随访时间≤1年的患者。4位作者对治疗前的影像学检查进行回顾,以评估各治疗机构之间的分类一致性。将患者分为2组,以确保结果代表典型的Ⅰ型骨折模式。4位作者一致认为骨折不符合Ⅰ型分类的任何患者被归入Ⅰ型+(T1+)组;所有其他患者被归入真正的Ⅰ型(TT1)组。我们评估了治疗前影像学检查的比例、伴随损伤情况、手术干预的必要性以及总体治疗结果,并分别对每组进行评估。

结果

共有48例患者符合纳入标准;40例在TT1组,8例在T1+组,这表明这些骨折的分类缺乏完全一致性。总体而言,12例(25%)接受了手术治疗,12例(25%)有伴随损伤。此外,8例患者需要额外的手术治疗,包括ACL重建(n = 4)、外侧半月板修复(n = 2)、外侧半月板切除术(n = 1)、松解嵌顿的内侧半月板(n = 1)和内侧半月板切除术(n = 1)。

结论

Ⅰ型骨折的分类可能具有挑战性。与之前的想法相反,发现大量此类骨折患者(>20%)存在伴随损伤。总体而言,我们队列中的25%患者接受了手术治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef33/9168882/756fc49cd518/10.1177_23259671221099572-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验