Suppr超能文献

2型胫骨髁间棘骨折非手术与手术治疗的比较

A Comparison of Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Type 2 Tibial Spine Fractures.

作者信息

Prasad Niyathi, Aoyama Julien T, Ganley Theodore J, Ellis Henry B, Mistovich R Justin, Yen Yi-Meng, Fabricant Peter D, Green Daniel W, Cruz Aristides I, McKay Scott, Kushare Indranil, Schmale Gregory A, Rhodes Jason T, Jagodzinski Jason, Sachleben Brant C, Sargent M Catherine, Lee R Jay

机构信息

Investigation performed at The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):2325967120975410. doi: 10.1177/2325967120975410. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are typically treated nonoperatively when nondisplaced and operatively when completely displaced. However, it is unclear whether displaced but hinged (type 2) TSFs should be treated operatively or nonoperatively.

PURPOSE

To compare operative versus nonoperative treatment of type 2 TSFs in terms of overall complication rate, ligamentous laxity, knee range of motion, and rate of subsequent operation.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We reviewed 164 type 2 TSFs in patients aged 6 to 16 years treated between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2019. Excluded were patients with previous TSFs, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, femoral or tibial fractures, or grade 2 or 3 injury of the collateral ligaments or posterior cruciate ligament. Patients were placed according to treatment into the operative group (n = 123) or nonoperative group (n = 41). The only patient characteristic that differed between groups was body mass index (22 [nonoperative] vs 20 [operative]; = .02). Duration of follow-up was longer in the operative versus the nonoperative group (11 vs 6.9 months). At final follow-up, 74% of all patients had recorded laxity examinations.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, the nonoperative group had more ACL laxity than did the operative group ( < .01). Groups did not differ significantly in overall complication rate, reoperation rate, or total range of motion (all, > .05). The nonoperative group had a higher rate of subsequent new TSFs and ACL injuries requiring surgery (4.9%) when compared with the operative group (0%; = .01). The operative group had a higher rate of arthrofibrosis (8.9%) than did the nonoperative group (0%; = .047). Reoperation was most common for hardware removal (14%), lysis of adhesions (6.5%), and manipulation under anesthesia (6.5%).

CONCLUSION

Although complication rates were similar between nonoperatively and operatively treated type 2 TSFs, patients treated nonoperatively had higher rates of residual laxity and subsequent tibial spine and ACL surgery, whereas patients treated operatively had a higher rate of arthrofibrosis. These findings should be considered when treating patients with type 2 TSF.

摘要

背景

胫骨棘骨折(TSFs)在无移位时通常采用非手术治疗,完全移位时则采用手术治疗。然而,对于移位但有铰链样改变(2型)的TSFs应采用手术还是非手术治疗尚不清楚。

目的

比较2型TSFs手术与非手术治疗在总体并发症发生率、韧带松弛度、膝关节活动范围及后续手术率方面的差异。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

我们回顾了2000年1月1日至2019年1月31日期间治疗的164例6至16岁2型TSFs患者。排除既往有TSF、前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤、股骨或胫骨骨折,或侧副韧带或后交叉韧带2级或3级损伤的患者。根据治疗方式将患者分为手术组(n = 123)和非手术组(n = 41)。两组之间唯一不同的患者特征是体重指数(非手术组为22,手术组为20;P = 0.02)。手术组的随访时间比非手术组长(11个月对6.9个月)。在末次随访时,所有患者中有74%进行了松弛度检查。

结果

在末次随访时,非手术组的ACL松弛度高于手术组(P < 0.01)。两组在总体并发症发生率、再次手术率或总活动范围方面无显著差异(均P > 0.05)。与手术组(0%)相比,非手术组后续新发TSF和需要手术的ACL损伤发生率更高(4.9%;P = 0.01)。手术组的关节纤维性强直发生率(8.9%)高于非手术组(0%;P = 0.047)。再次手术最常见的原因是取出内固定物(14%)、粘连松解(6.5%)和麻醉下手法操作(6.5%)。

结论

虽然2型TSFs手术和非手术治疗的并发症发生率相似,但非手术治疗的患者残留松弛度及后续胫骨棘和ACL手术的发生率更高,而手术治疗的患者关节纤维性强直发生率更高。在治疗2型TSF患者时应考虑这些发现。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Type 2 Tibial Spine Fractures.2型胫骨髁间棘骨折非手术与手术治疗的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):2325967120975410. doi: 10.1177/2325967120975410. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?胫骨棘骨折的前移位:解剖复位重要吗?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 22;11(8):23259671231192978. doi: 10.1177/23259671231192978. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures: Exploring Case Burden by Age and Sex.小儿胫骨棘骨折:按年龄和性别探究病例负担
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):23259671211027237. doi: 10.1177/23259671211027237. eCollection 2021 Sep.

引用本文的文献

3
Paediatric knee fractures: A current concept review.小儿膝关节骨折:当前概念综述
J Child Orthop. 2025 May 31:18632521251327129. doi: 10.1177/18632521251327129.
7
Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?胫骨棘骨折的前移位:解剖复位重要吗?
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 22;11(8):23259671231192978. doi: 10.1177/23259671231192978. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Incidence of anterior tibial spine fracture among skiers does not differ with age.滑雪者胫骨前棘骨折的发生率与年龄无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2291-2297. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06782-7. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

6
Management and outcomes of isolated paediatric tibial spine fractures.小儿孤立性胫骨棘骨折的治疗与预后
Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验