Goetz Stefan M M, Weisfeld Carol Cronin, Weisfeld Glenn E
Peace Research Institute Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:900799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900799. eCollection 2022.
Developmental Psychology is the branch of psychology that studies, not only human behavior, but how and why human behavior changes over time. This essay seeks to review to what extent Developmental Psychology has failed to perceive human behavior through the lens of evolutionary theory in general, and in particular sexual selection as first described by Darwin and later elaborated on by many, including Robert Trivers and Geoffrey Miller; the essay asserts that this failure has resulted in many wrong turns and missed opportunities. In some cases, major developmental theorists (e.g., Freud, Erikson) were bedeviled by sex-based differences which they saw but could not explain and which compromised the parsimony of their stage theories. In the case of stage theories of moral development, some major theorists (e.g., Piaget, Kohlberg) were able to offer simpler explanations of moral development only by limiting their studies to male subjects. And, while Developmental Psychology textbooks thoroughly describe sex differences in the timing of morphological changes in puberty, writers seldom discuss why the timing is different in the two sexes, universally, and functionally. On the other hand, several domains of developmental focus, including play, mate choice, parenting, and spatial cognition, have seen successful research efforts that utilized sexually selected predispositions as foundational assumptions. The essay concludes with a discussion of how a more evolutionary and functional view of human behavior might move the field of Developmental Psychology to an even more robust and accurate understanding of how humans change over the course of a lifetime.
发展心理学是心理学的一个分支,它不仅研究人类行为,还研究人类行为如何以及为何随时间而变化。本文旨在探讨发展心理学在多大程度上未能从进化理论的角度,特别是从达尔文最初描述、后来包括罗伯特·特里弗斯和杰弗里·米勒等许多人进一步阐述的性选择的角度来理解人类行为;本文认为,这种未能理解导致了许多错误的转向和错失的机会。在某些情况下,主要的发展理论家(如弗洛伊德、埃里克森)受到基于性别的差异的困扰,他们看到了这些差异却无法解释,这损害了他们阶段理论的简洁性。就道德发展的阶段理论而言,一些主要理论家(如皮亚杰、科尔伯格)只能通过将研究局限于男性受试者,才能对道德发展提供更简单的解释。而且,虽然发展心理学教科书详尽描述了青春期形态变化时间上的性别差异,但作者们很少讨论为什么两性在青春期形态变化的时间上普遍且在功能上存在差异。另一方面,发展关注的几个领域,包括玩耍、配偶选择、养育子女和空间认知,已经有了成功的研究成果,这些研究将性选择的倾向作为基本假设。本文最后讨论了对人类行为采取更具进化性和功能性的观点如何可能推动发展心理学领域对人类一生的变化有更健全、更准确的理解。