Wang Yuanping, Liu Yuntao, Yan Xia, Wang Dawei
Shunde Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 528333, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 30;2022:6973151. doi: 10.1155/2022/6973151. eCollection 2022.
Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias. Wenxin Keli (WXKL) is a Chinese herbal extract widely used in China to treat patients with atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to outline and summarize the current evidence of systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) investigating the clinical efficacy of WXKL in atrial fibrillation.
From inception to December 2021, 6 electronic databases in English and Chinese were searched for potential SRs/MAs. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) checklist, and AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2) were used to evaluate the quality of the evidence, reporting, and methodology of SRs/MAs regarding WXKL for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
A total of 8 SRs/MAs were included in the present study. The results of AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA were unsatisfactory for the main insufficiency founded in registration and protocol, search strategy, excluded study statement, evidence certainty assessment, and funding and conflict of interest information. All the included SRs/MAs were assessed as very low in methodological quality. Moreover, 23 outcomes were evaluated by GRADE for the certainty of evidence, and 2 outcomes were assessed as moderate, while 15 were low and 6 were very low. Risk of bias and publication bias contributed to the downgrading.
WXKL may be clinically efficacious and safe for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This finding, however, should be regarded with caution because of the low level of evidence and methodological qualities of the involved SRs/MAs. More standardized, rigorous, and comprehensive SRs/MAs and randomized control trials are needed to provide strong evidence to reach more convincing conclusions.
心房颤动是最常见的心律失常之一。稳心颗粒是一种在中国广泛用于治疗心房颤动患者的中药提取物。本研究旨在概述和总结目前关于稳心颗粒治疗心房颤动临床疗效的系统评价(SRs)/荟萃分析(MAs)的证据。
从数据库建立至2021年12月,检索了6个中英文电子数据库,以查找潜在的SRs/MAs。采用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定与评价)、PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析优先报告条目)清单以及AMSTAR-2(评估系统评价方法学质量-2)来评估关于稳心颗粒治疗心房颤动的SRs/MAs的证据质量、报告情况和方法学。
本研究共纳入8项SRs/MAs。AMSTAR-2和PRISMA的结果不尽人意,主要不足在于注册和方案、检索策略、排除研究说明、证据确定性评估以及资金和利益冲突信息方面。所有纳入的SRs/MAs在方法学质量上均被评估为极低。此外,通过GRADE评估了23项结局的证据确定性,2项结局被评估为中等,15项为低等,6项为极低。偏倚风险和发表偏倚导致了证据等级的降低。
稳心颗粒治疗心房颤动可能在临床疗效和安全性方面有效。然而,由于所涉及的SRs/MAs的证据水平和方法学质量较低,这一发现应谨慎看待。需要更多标准化、严格和全面的SRs/MAs以及随机对照试验来提供有力证据,以得出更有说服力的结论。