索磷布韦为基础的药物治疗方案联合或不联合利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎患者的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based medication regimens with and without ribavirin in hepatitis C patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA.

Central Administration for Drug Control, Egyptian Drug Authority, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Aug;47(8):1149-1158. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13698. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sofosbuvir (SOF) is a new and highly effective medication that dramatically improved hepatitis C virus (HCV) management. However, ribavirin (RBV) is still added to SOF-based medication regimens in several clinical scenarios, despite its well-known toxicities. The aim of our study is to systematically review and analyse the impact of adding RBV to SOF-based medication regimens on clinical outcomes among HCV patients.

METHODS

Included studies were randomized trials comparing the same SOF-based medication regimens with and without RBV in HCV patients and measuring serious adverse events (SAEs) and/or sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR-12). Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Cochrane Library through September 2021. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess trials quality. Clinical outcomes were analysed as risk ratios (RR) using a random effects model using R version 4.1.2.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our study included a total of 26 trials with 5058 HCV patients. Quality assessment showed moderate risk of bias for most trials. Upon adding RBV, there was no significant difference in SAEs (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.77-1.48, I  = 10%), nor an impact on SVR-12 (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.01, I  = 41%). There was no evidence of publication bias for either outcome. Subgroup analysis consistently showed lack of benefit among HCV subgroups. Additionally, NCT01826981 was identified as the main source of heterogeneity in the SVR-12 outcome.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest nonsignificant differences in safety and efficacy between SOF-based medication regimens with and without RBV which should be considered in clinical practice.

摘要

已知和目的

索非布韦(SOF)是一种新的、高效的药物,极大地改善了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗。然而,尽管利巴韦林(RBV)具有众所周知的毒性,但在几种临床情况下,仍将其添加到基于 SOF 的药物治疗方案中。我们研究的目的是系统地回顾和分析在 HCV 患者中,将 RBV 添加到基于 SOF 的药物治疗方案中对临床结果的影响。

方法

纳入的研究是比较 HCV 患者相同的基于 SOF 的药物治疗方案加用和不加用 RBV 的随机试验,并测量治疗后 12 周的严重不良事件(SAE)和/或持续病毒学应答(SVR-12)。两名研究者独立检索了 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library,检索时间截至 2021 年 9 月。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估试验质量。使用 R 版本 4.1.2 中的随机效应模型,将临床结果分析为风险比(RR)。

结果和讨论

我们的研究共纳入了 26 项试验,共 5058 例 HCV 患者。质量评估显示,大多数试验存在中度偏倚风险。加用 RBV 后,SAE 无显著差异(RR 1.07,95%CI:0.77-1.48,I²=10%),对 SVR-12 也没有影响(RR 1.00,95%CI:0.98-1.01,I²=41%)。两个结局均无发表偏倚的证据。亚组分析一致表明,在 HCV 亚组中,加用 RBV 没有获益。此外,还发现 NCT01826981 是 SVR-12 结局异质性的主要来源。

创新和结论

我们的研究结果表明,基于 SOF 的药物治疗方案加用或不加用 RBV 在安全性和疗效方面无显著差异,这在临床实践中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de40/9545628/e20f6ac12054/JCPT-47-1149-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索