• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Debrichem在英国治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of Debrichem in managing hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK.

作者信息

Guest Julian F, Deanesi Valter, Segalla Arrigo

机构信息

Catalyst Consultants, Poole, UK.

Villa Berica Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2022 Jun 2;31(6):480-491. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.6.480.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2022.31.6.480
PMID:35678784
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether the topical debriding agent, Debrichem, could potentially afford the UK's National Health Service (NHS) a cost-effective intervention for the management of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs).

METHOD

A Markov model was constructed depicting the management of hard-to-heal VLUs with Debrichem plus standard care (SC) or SC alone over a period of 12 months. The model was populated with inputs from an indirect comparison of two propensity score-matched cohorts. The model estimated the cost-effectiveness of the two interventions in terms of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2019/20 prices.

RESULTS

Addition of Debrichem to a SC protocol to treat hard-to-heal VLUs was found to increase the probability of healing by 75% (from 0.35 to 0.61) by 12 months, and to increase health-related quality of life over 12 months from 0.74 to 0.84 QALYs per patient. The 12-month cost of treatment with Debrichem plus SC (£3128 per patient) instead of SC alone (£7195 per patient) has the potential to reduce the total NHS cost of wound management by up to 57%. Hence, Debrichem was estimated to improve health outcomes for less cost. Sensitivity analysis showed that Debrichem plus SC remained a cost-effective (dominant) treatment with plausible variations in costs and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, the addition of Debrichem to a SC protocol potentially affords a cost-effective treatment to the NHS for managing hard-to-heal VLUs.

摘要

目的

评估外用清创剂Debrichem是否有可能为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)提供一种具有成本效益的干预措施,用于治疗难愈合的下肢静脉溃疡(VLUs)。

方法

构建一个马尔可夫模型,描述在12个月期间使用Debrichem加标准护理(SC)或仅使用SC治疗难愈合VLUs的情况。该模型采用了两个倾向得分匹配队列间接比较的输入数据。该模型根据以2019/20年价格计算的每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本,估计了这两种干预措施的成本效益。

结果

发现在SC方案中添加Debrichem治疗难愈合的VLUs,到12个月时愈合概率提高了75%(从0.35提高到0.61),并且在12个月内每位患者的健康相关生活质量从0.74 QALYs提高到0.84 QALYs。使用Debrichem加SC治疗12个月的成本(每位患者3128英镑)而非仅使用SC治疗(每位患者7195英镑)有可能使NHS伤口管理的总成本降低多达57%。因此,估计Debrichem能以更低的成本改善健康结果。敏感性分析表明,在成本和效果存在合理变化的情况下,Debrichem加SC仍然是一种具有成本效益(占优)的治疗方法。

结论

在该研究的局限性范围内,在SC方案中添加Debrichem有可能为NHS提供一种具有成本效益的治疗方法,用于管理难愈合的VLUs。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Debrichem in managing hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK.Debrichem在英国治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡中的成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2022 Jun 2;31(6):480-491. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.6.480.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using intermittent pneumatic compression to manage hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK.在英国使用间歇性气动压迫疗法治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡的成本效益分析
J Wound Care. 2021 Jul 2;30(7):544-552. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.7.544.
3
Cost-effectiveness of ChloraSolv in treating hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers.氯仿溶液治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡的成本效益
J Wound Care. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):4-13. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.1.4.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using a collagen-containing dressing plus compression therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers.在不愈合的下肢静脉溃疡中使用含胶原蛋白敷料加压迫疗法的成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2018 Feb 2;27(2):68-78. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.2.68.
5
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of electric stimulation therapy in non-healing venous leg ulcers.模拟电刺激疗法在难愈合下肢静脉溃疡中的成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2011 Oct;20(10):464, 466, 468-72. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.10.464.
6
Relative cost-effectiveness of three compression bandages in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers in the UK.英国三种压迫绷带治疗新诊断静脉性腿部溃疡的相对成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2023 Mar 2;32(3):146-158. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.3.146.
7
Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an externally applied electroceutical device in managing venous leg ulcers in clinical practice in the UK.在英国临床实践中,一种外用电子治疗设备治疗下肢静脉溃疡的临床疗效及成本效益
J Wound Care. 2015 Dec;24(12):572, 574-80. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.12.572.
8
Cost-effectiveness of two reduced pressure compression systems in treating newly diagnosed venous leg ulcers.两种减压压迫系统治疗新诊断静脉性腿部溃疡的成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2023 Jun 2;32(6):348-358. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.6.348.
9
Potential cost-effectiveness of using a collagen-containing dressing in managing diabetic foot ulcers in the UK.在英国,使用含胶原蛋白敷料治疗糖尿病足溃疡的潜在成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2018 Mar 2;27(3):136-144. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.136.
10
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs.吸收性敷料治疗高渗性静脉腿部溃疡的临床疗效及成本效益
J Wound Care. 2013 Mar;22(3):109-10, 112-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.3.109.

引用本文的文献

1
A debriding gel in the treatment of post-trauma, non-healing lesions.一种清创凝胶在创伤后不愈合伤口治疗中的应用。
Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Jun 15;13(3):136-141. eCollection 2023.
2
Cohort study assessing the impact of COVID-19 on venous leg ulcer management and associated clinical outcomes in clinical practice in the UK.在英国临床实践中评估 COVID-19 对静脉溃疡管理和相关临床结局影响的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 20;13(2):e068845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068845.