Oncology Clinical Trial Office, Oncology Unit IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7645-7653. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07184-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
BACKGROUND: Iron supplementation improves the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents' (ESAs) response in chemotherapy-related anemia. The primary aim of our study is to assess the efficacy of sucrosomial iron, a new oral iron formulation, in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia treated with ESAs. The secondary objectives included the efficacy into two subgroups of patients (iron replete and functional iron deficiency) between the two study arms, safety and the effect on transfusion need. METHODS: In this randomized, multicentre, open-label, phase III clinical trial, 60 cancer patients were enrolled. Each patient was randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 12 weeks of oral sucrosomial iron at the dose of 30 mg daily in combination with ESAs or no supplementation to ESA treatment. The endpoint considered for efficacy was the proportion of patients achieving complete hematological response at 12 weeks (increase in Hb > 2 g/dL from baseline, without RBC transfusions in the previous 28 days or achieving Hb ≥ 12 g/dL). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between oral sucrosomial iron supplementation in combination with ESAs and the achievement of a complete hematological response. This response was achieved within 12 weeks by 31% of patients in the control group and by 52% of patients supplemented with oral sucrosomial iron. A trend of greater response in sucrosomial iron arm was found in both subgroups. No difference was observed about safety and transfusion need. CONCLUSIONS: Sucrosomial iron is well tolerated and its combination with ESAs improves the hematological response in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: This study has been reviewed by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy (28/04/2015; prot. N. 20,150,002,059), and by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the other Italian oncological centers involved in this study.
背景:铁剂补充可改善化疗相关性贫血患者促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)的反应。本研究的主要目的是评估新型口服铁剂蔗糖铁在接受 ESA 治疗的化疗诱导性贫血的癌症患者中的疗效。次要目标包括在两个研究臂之间将疗效分为两个亚组(铁充足和功能性铁缺乏)、安全性和对输血需求的影响。
方法:在这项随机、多中心、开放性、III 期临床试验中,纳入了 60 例癌症患者。每位患者均按 1:1 比例随机分配(随机分组),分别接受 12 周的每日 30mg 口服蔗糖铁与 ESA 联合治疗或 ESA 治疗无补充。疗效的终点考虑为 12 周时完全血液学反应的患者比例(Hb 从基线增加>2g/dL,在过去 28 天内无 RBC 输注或 Hb≥12g/dL)。
结果:ESA 联合口服蔗糖铁补充与实现完全血液学反应之间存在统计学显著关联。在对照组中,有 31%的患者在 12 周内达到完全血液学反应,而接受口服蔗糖铁补充的患者中有 52%达到该反应。在两个亚组中,蔗糖铁组的反应均呈上升趋势,但无统计学差异。未观察到安全性和输血需求方面的差异。
结论:蔗糖铁耐受良好,与 ESA 联合使用可改善化疗相关性贫血癌症患者的血液学反应。
临床试验注册号和注册日期:本研究已由意大利帕维亚 IRCCS 圣马特奥基金会综合医院机构伦理委员会(2015 年 4 月 28 日;批准号 20,150,002,059)和参与本研究的其他意大利肿瘤中心的机构伦理委员会审查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-2-4
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023-5-17
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023-6-6
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021-5
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019-11-26
Acta Haematol. 2019-4-10