Department for General, Visceral, Endocrine, and Vascular Surgery, Krankenhaus Agatharied GmbH, Hausham, Germany.
Institute for Surgical Research Oberbayern, Hausham, Germany.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jul 1;148(7):646-653. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.1180.
Postthyroidectomy hemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening complication with no reliable noninvasive method of early detection.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of neck circumference measurement for early detection of postoperative hemorrhage after thyroidectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This diagnostic accuracy study at an academic teaching hospital used a prospective cohort of patients undergoing thyroid surgery from November 1, 2015, to January 31, 2018 (group 1), and a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing the same surgery from January 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021 (group 2). We performed repeated perioperative neck circumference measurements to evaluate the association of increased neck circumference with postthyroidectomy hemorrhage among patients at risk for hemorrhage.
The primary end point was the diagnostic value of neck circumference measurement for detection of postthyroidectomy hemorrhage. Additionally, data on demographic information and risk factors for postthyroidectomy hemorrhage were examined. Data analyses were performed from November 1, 2021, to January 5, 2022.
The prospective cohort (group 1) comprised 60 patients (45 [75%] women) with a mean (SD) age of 52.2 (13.5) years; those who experienced a postthyroidectomy hemorrhage had a mean (SD) age of 57.4 (9.0) years. The retrospective cohort (group 2) comprised 353 patients (258 [73%] women) with a mean (SD) age of 55.3 (14.1) years; patients who experienced a postthyroidectomy hemorrhage had a mean (SD) age of 62.2 (10.0) years. In group 1, postoperative neck circumference increased by a median (range) of 5.0 (4.0 to 7.0) cm in patients with hemorrhage, and only 1.0 (-2.5 to 4.0) cm in patients with no postoperative bleeding (difference in the medians, 4.0 cm [95% CI, 3.0 to 5.5 cm]; effect size, 3.74 [95% CI, 2.6 to 4.9]). Defining a 7% or greater increase in neck circumference as the cutoff value for detecting postthyroidectomy hemorrhage showed a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.0) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.92), respectively. The retrospective validation also showed a difference in median (range) increase of postoperative neck circumference between patients with hemorrhage and those without-3.0 (0 to 6.0) cm vs 0.0 (-6.0 to 5.0) cm (difference in medians, 3.8 cm [95% CI, 3.0 to 4.9]; effect size, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.96 to 2.3]). Considering 12 false-positive and 332 correct-negative results, the diagnostic tool showed a sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.99) and a specificity of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.98).
The findings of this diagnostic accuracy study suggest that neck circumference measurement is a feasible and easy-to-use diagnostic tool for routine clinical care to detect postthyroidectomy hemorrhage. A 7% or greater increase over the postoperative baseline neck circumference seems to be a reliable threshold for detecting postthyroidectomy hemorrhage. Neck circumference measurement should be used in combination with surveillance of clinical signs and symptoms.
甲状腺切除术后出血是一种潜在的危及生命的并发症,目前还没有可靠的非侵入性方法进行早期检测。
评估颈围测量在甲状腺手术后早期发现出血的诊断准确性。
设计、设置和参与者:这项在学术教学医院进行的诊断准确性研究使用了一个前瞻性队列,纳入了 2015 年 11 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 31 日期间接受甲状腺手术的患者(第 1 组),以及一个回顾性队列,纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间接受相同手术的患者(第 2 组)。我们进行了多次围手术期颈围测量,以评估有出血风险的患者颈围增加与甲状腺切除术后出血之间的关系。
主要终点是颈围测量对检测甲状腺切除术后出血的诊断价值。此外,还检查了与甲状腺切除术后出血相关的人口统计学信息和危险因素的数据。数据分析于 2021 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 5 日进行。
前瞻性队列(第 1 组)纳入了 60 例患者(45 例[75%]为女性),平均(标准差)年龄为 52.2(13.5)岁;发生甲状腺切除术后出血的患者平均(标准差)年龄为 57.4(9.0)岁。回顾性队列(第 2 组)纳入了 353 例患者(258 例[73%]为女性),平均(标准差)年龄为 55.3(14.1)岁;发生甲状腺切除术后出血的患者平均(标准差)年龄为 62.2(10.0)岁。在第 1 组中,出血患者的术后颈围中位数(范围)增加了 5.0(4.0 至 7.0)cm,而无术后出血的患者仅增加了 1.0(-2.5 至 4.0)cm(中位数差异,4.0 cm[95%置信区间,3.0 至 5.5 cm];效应量,3.74[95%置信区间,2.6 至 4.9])。将颈围增加 7%或更多定义为检测甲状腺切除术后出血的截断值,显示出诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 1.0(95%置信区间,0.48 至 1.0)和 0.86(95%置信区间,0.71 至 0.92)。回顾性验证也显示了出血患者和无出血患者之间术后颈围中位数(范围)增加的差异-3.0(0 至 6.0)cm 与 0.0(-6.0 至 5.0)cm(中位数差异,3.8 cm[95%置信区间,3.0 至 4.9];效应量,1.63[95%置信区间,0.96 至 2.3])。考虑到 12 例假阳性和 332 例正确阴性结果,该诊断工具的敏感性为 0.89(95%置信区间,0.51 至 0.99),特异性为 0.97(95%置信区间,0.94 至 0.98)。
这项诊断准确性研究的结果表明,颈围测量是一种可行且易于使用的诊断工具,可用于常规临床护理以检测甲状腺切除术后出血。颈围增加 7%或更多似乎是检测甲状腺切除术后出血的可靠阈值。颈围测量应与临床体征和症状的监测结合使用。