• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急护理中信息处理和决策的心理模型。

Mental model for information processing and decision-making in emergency care.

机构信息

Nursing Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269624. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269624
PMID:35679348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9182258/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty and time pressure in emergency departments add a challenge to the rational decision-making process, specifically when encountering a critical patient who requires a prompt response. However, there has been little attempt to develop a mental structure model to understand the thought processes and identify cognitive weaknesses points in nurses' decision-making. A better understanding can inform changes in both practice learning strategies and decision-making in emergency department. This study aims to better understand how newly employed nurses process information and initiate actions in emergency situations characterized by time constraints and uncertainty.

METHOD

Participants worked under time pressure and uncertainty to solve a simulated shock case by establishing an assumption of what type of shock the simulated patient might have and its cause. An 8-minute window was available to initiate action. Following the simulation, a retrospective think-aloud interview was conducted.

FINDINGS

Participants' ability to identify the category of shock was better than their ability to identify the underlaying cause of the shock. This influenced their ability to intervene correctly. Participants' thinking process in an emergency situation can be organized using ABCDE acronym as follows: (1) awareness of the situation, followed by, an instant (2) generation of beliefs (presumption), (3) controlling the consequence (first-line management action), (4) involvement in deliberate thinking and, finally (5) execution, actions (second-line management action). The cognitive weakness was mainly noticed during the first-line management action when participants were involved in immediate lifesaving activities.

CONCLUSION

Classification of the steps involved in decision-making when encountering emergency situations may provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the thought process at different stages. Further studies are required.

摘要

背景

急诊科的不确定性和时间压力给理性决策过程增加了挑战,尤其是在遇到需要快速反应的危急患者时。然而,目前很少有人试图开发一种心理结构模型来理解护士决策过程中的思维过程和认知弱点。更好地了解这一点可以为实践学习策略和急诊科决策的改变提供信息。本研究旨在更好地了解新入职护士在时间限制和不确定性的紧急情况下如何处理信息并采取行动。

方法

参与者在时间压力和不确定性下通过建立对模拟患者可能患有哪种类型休克及其原因的假设来解决模拟休克病例。有 8 分钟的时间窗口可以采取行动。模拟结束后,进行回溯性出声思维访谈。

发现

参与者识别休克类别的能力优于识别休克根本原因的能力。这影响了他们正确干预的能力。参与者在紧急情况下的思维过程可以使用 ABCDE 缩写组织如下:(1)对情况的意识,其次是瞬间(2)信念的产生(假设),(3)控制后果(一线管理行动),(4)参与深思熟虑,最后(5)执行,行动(二线管理行动)。认知弱点主要在一线管理行动中被注意到,此时参与者参与立即的救生活动。

结论

对遇到紧急情况时决策所涉及步骤的分类可以深入了解不同阶段思维过程的优缺点。需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d3/9182258/57b4844882ac/pone.0269624.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d3/9182258/65a7736fb8bd/pone.0269624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d3/9182258/57b4844882ac/pone.0269624.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d3/9182258/65a7736fb8bd/pone.0269624.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60d3/9182258/57b4844882ac/pone.0269624.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Mental model for information processing and decision-making in emergency care.紧急护理中信息处理和决策的心理模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269624. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
3
Decision-making under pressure: medical errors in uncertain and dynamic environments.压力下的决策:不确定和动态环境中的医疗差错
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Aug;42(4):395-402. doi: 10.1071/AH16088.
4
Thinking strategies used by Registered Nurses during emergency department triage.注册护士在急诊科分诊时使用的思维策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(2):163-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04473.x.
5
Situation awareness and documentation of changes that affect patient outcomes in progress notes.在病程记录中对影响患者预后的变化进行情况感知和记录。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 May;23(9-10):1403-10. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12404. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
6
ED Triage Decision-Making With Mental Health Presentations: A "Think Aloud" Study.伴有心理健康问题的急诊分诊决策:一项“出声思考”研究
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Nov;41(6):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
Medication knowledge and willingness to nurse-initiate medications in an emergency department: a mixed-methods study.急诊科的用药知识及护士主动给药意愿:一项混合方法研究
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):396-408. doi: 10.1111/jan.12840. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
Registered nurses' decision-making regarding documentation in patients' progress notes.注册护士在患者病程记录中进行决策的相关内容。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Oct;21(19-20):2917-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04135.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
10
Understanding behavioral intent to participate in shared decision-making in medically uncertain situations.理解在医学情况不确定时参与共同决策的行为意图。
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(4):301-8. doi: 10.3414/ME11-01-0077. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time assessment of triage nurse situational awareness (SA) using the situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT).使用态势感知全局评估技术(SAGAT)对分诊护士的态势感知(SA)进行实时评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 12;20(2):e0318555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318555. eCollection 2025.
2
When Nurses in an Emergency Situation Look for a Medical Item But Fail to See It.当护士在紧急情况下寻找医疗用品但找不到时。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241279811. doi: 10.1177/00469580241279811.
3
Maximization delays decision-making in acute care nursing.
最大化会延迟急性护理中的决策。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 6;14(1):5482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56037-x.