• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的 24 个月更新疗效比较分析。

A 24-month updated analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs. SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023 Feb;23(2):199-206. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171994. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1080/14737140.2023.2171994
PMID:36723678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11104735/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the ZUMA-5 trial (Clinical trials identification: NCT03105336), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients and clear superiority relative to the SCHOLAR-5 external control cohort. We update this comparison using the ZUMA-5 24-month data.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The SCHOLAR-5 cohort is comprised of r/r FL patients who initiated ≥3 line of therapy after July 2014 and meeting ZUMA-5 eligibility criteria. Groups were balanced for patient characteristics through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. The overall response rate was compared using a weighted logistic regression. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using a Cox regression.

RESULTS

For SCHOLAR-5, the sum of weights for the 143 patients was 85 after SMR weighting, versus 86 patients in ZUMA-5. The median follow-up was 29.4 months and 25.4 months for ZUMA-5 and SCHOLAR-5, respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival were 0.52 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.95) and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.17-0.45), favoring axi-cel.

CONCLUSION

This updated analysis, using a longer minimum follow-up than a previously published analysis, shows that the improved efficacy of axi-cel, relative to available therapies, in r/r FL is durable. .

摘要

背景

在 ZUMA-5 试验(临床试验识别号:NCT03105336)中,axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel;嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法)在复发/难治性(r/r)滤泡淋巴瘤(FL)患者中显示出高比例的持久缓解率,并相对于 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照队列具有明显优势。我们使用 ZUMA-5 的 24 个月数据对此进行了更新。

研究设计与方法

SCHOLAR-5 队列由 r/r FL 患者组成,这些患者在 2014 年 7 月后接受了≥3 线治疗,并符合 ZUMA-5 的入选标准。通过基于预设预后因素的标准化死亡率(SMR)加权对患者特征进行倾向评分,使两组在患者特征上达到平衡。使用加权逻辑回归比较总体缓解率。使用 Cox 回归评估生存时间事件。

结果

对于 SCHOLAR-5,143 名患者的权重总和在 SMR 加权后为 85,而 ZUMA-5 中有 86 名患者。中位随访时间分别为 ZUMA-5 和 SCHOLAR-5 的 29.4 个月和 25.4 个月。总生存和无进展生存的风险比分别为 0.52(95%置信区间(CI):0.28-0.95)和 0.28(95% CI:0.17-0.45),有利于 axi-cel。

结论

与之前发表的分析相比,此次使用更长的最小随访时间进行的更新分析表明,axi-cel 在 r/r FL 中的疗效优于现有疗法,且持久。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b1/11104735/1741e091c748/nihms-1974604-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b1/11104735/1741e091c748/nihms-1974604-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08b1/11104735/1741e091c748/nihms-1974604-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A 24-month updated analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs. SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的 24 个月更新疗效比较分析。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023 Feb;23(2):199-206. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171994. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的比较效果。
Blood. 2022 Aug 25;140(8):851-860. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014375.
3
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel to Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.阿基仑赛注射液与莫苏奈妥珠单抗治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的匹配调整间接比较
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Sep;30(9):885.e1-885.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.016. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
A Comparison of 3-Year Follow-up of ZUMA-5 (Axicabtagene Ciloleucel) With SCHOLAR-5 in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.ZUMA-5(阿基仑赛)与 SCHOLAR-5 治疗复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的 3 年随访结果比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 May;24(5):e191-e195.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Three-year follow-up analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5).ZUMA-5 研究:复发/难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中 axicabtagene ciloleucel 的 3 年随访分析。
Blood. 2024 Feb 8;143(6):496-506. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021243.
6
Cost-effectiveness of treating relapsed or refractory 3L+ follicular lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel vs mosunetuzumab in the United States.在美国,用 axicabtagene ciloleucel 治疗复发/难治性 3L+滤泡性淋巴瘤与 mosunetuzumab 的成本效益比较。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 24;15:1393939. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393939. eCollection 2024.
7
Real-World Evidence of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States.美国真实世界研究评估 Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):581.e1-581.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.026. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Quality-Adjusted Time without Symptoms or Toxicity: Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma.质量调整无病生存时间:阿基仑赛注射液对比复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者标准治疗的分析。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 May;29(5):335.e1-335.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
9
Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium.阿基仑赛用于复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的标准治疗:来自美国淋巴瘤嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗联盟的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3119-3128. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02104. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.基于真实世界法国登记数据的阿基仑赛与Tisagenlecleucel 治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4282-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02971-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of CAR T Cells and Adoptive T-Cell Therapies in Lymphoid and Solid Organ Malignancies.嵌合抗原受体T细胞及过继性T细胞疗法在淋巴系统和实体器官恶性肿瘤中的研究综述
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Feb 2;31:e948125. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948125.
2
CAR T Cells and T-Cell Therapies for Cancer: A Translational Science Review.嵌合抗原受体T细胞及癌症T细胞疗法:转化科学综述
JAMA. 2024 Dec 10;332(22):1924-1935. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.19462.
3
Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma: New Settings and Future Directions.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法治疗淋巴瘤:新的应用场景与未来方向

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes in patients relapsed/refractory after ≥2 prior lines of therapy for follicular lymphoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.≥2 线治疗后复发/难治滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的临床结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10546-6.
2
Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.tisagenlecleucel 对比常规护理治疗复发/难治性滤泡淋巴瘤患者的疗效比较。
Blood Adv. 2022 Nov 22;6(22):5835-5843. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008150.
3
A Retrospective Cohort Study of Treatment Outcomes of Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (ReCORD-FL).
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 21;16(1):46. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010046.
4
Three-year follow-up analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5).ZUMA-5 研究:复发/难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中 axicabtagene ciloleucel 的 3 年随访分析。
Blood. 2024 Feb 8;143(6):496-506. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021243.
5
Burden of Illness in Follicular Lymphoma with Multiple Lines of Treatment, Italian RWE Analysis.意大利真实世界证据分析:多线治疗的滤泡性淋巴瘤的疾病负担
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;15(17):4403. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174403.
复发性或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤成年患者治疗结果的回顾性队列研究(ReCORD-FL)
Hemasphere. 2022 Jun 21;6(7):e745. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000745. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Safety and efficacy of mosunetuzumab, a bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study.在复发或难治性滤泡淋巴瘤患者中,双特异性抗体 mosunetuzumab 的安全性和疗效:一项单臂、多中心、2 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Aug;23(8):1055-1065. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00335-7. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.西达基奥仑赛对比挽救化疗后自体干细胞移植作为二线治疗复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗(TRANSFORM):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验的中期分析结果。
Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2294-2308. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6.
6
Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的比较效果。
Blood. 2022 Aug 25;140(8):851-860. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014375.
7
Real-World Evidence of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States.美国真实世界研究评估 Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):581.e1-581.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.026. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receiving three or more lines of systemic therapy (LEO CReWE): a multicentre cohort study.接受三线或三线以上系统治疗的复发或难治性滤泡淋巴瘤患者的治疗模式和结局(LEO CReWE):一项多中心队列研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2022 Apr;9(4):e289-e300. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00033-3.
9
Prospects in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma beyond first-line therapy.滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗以外患者管理的前景。
Haematologica. 2022 Jan 1;107(1):19-34. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278717.
10
Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: the phase 2 ELARA trial.替沙格赛定在成人复发或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的应用:2期ELARA试验
Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):325-332. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01622-0. Epub 2021 Dec 17.