Suppr超能文献

常见遗传变异在假定的单基因癫痫中的作用。

The role of common genetic variation in presumed monogenic epilepsies.

机构信息

The SFI FutureNeuro Research Centre, RCSI Dublin, Republic of Ireland; The School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI Dublin, Republic of Ireland.

Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America; UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG and Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Bucks, United Kingdom; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and M.I.T, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2022 Jul;81:104098. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104098. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are the most severe group of epilepsies which co-present with developmental delay and intellectual disability (ID). DEEs usually occur in people without a family history of epilepsy and have emerged as primarily monogenic, with damaging rare mutations found in 50% of patients. Little is known about the genetic architecture of patients with DEEs in whom no pathogenic variant is identified. Polygenic risk scoring (PRS) is a method that measures a person's common genetic burden for a trait or condition. Here, we used PRS to test whether genetic burden for epilepsy is relevant in individuals with DEEs, and other forms of epilepsy with ID.

METHODS

Genetic data on 2,759 cases with DEEs, or epilepsy with ID presumed to have a monogenic basis, and 447,760 population-matched controls were analysed. We compared PRS for 'all epilepsy', 'focal epilepsy', and 'genetic generalised epilepsy' (GGE) between cases and controls. We performed pairwise comparisons between cases stratified for identifiable rare deleterious genetic variants and controls.

FINDINGS

Cases of presumed monogenic severe epilepsy had an increased PRS for 'all epilepsy' (p<0.0001), 'focal epilepsy' (p<0.0001), and 'GGE' (p=0.0002) relative to controls, which explain between 0.08% and 3.3% of phenotypic variance. PRS was increased in cases both with and without an identified deleterious variant of major effect, and there was no significant difference in PRS between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

We provide evidence that common genetic variation contributes to the aetiology of DEEs and other forms of epilepsy with ID, even when there is a known pathogenic variant of major effect. These results provide insight into the genetic underpinnings of the severe epilepsies and warrant a shift in our understanding of the aetiology of the DEEs as complex, rather than monogenic, disorders.

FUNDING

Science foundation Ireland, Human Genome Research Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; German Research Foundation.

摘要

背景

发育性和癫痫性脑病(DEEs)是最严重的一组癫痫,其特征是发育迟缓伴智力障碍(ID)。DEEs 通常发生在没有癫痫家族史的人群中,并且主要是单基因的,50%的患者发现有破坏性的罕见突变。对于没有发现致病变异的 DEEs 患者,其遗传结构知之甚少。多基因风险评分(PRS)是一种衡量一个人在特定特征或疾病方面的常见遗传负担的方法。在这里,我们使用 PRS 来测试遗传易感性在 DEEs 患者和其他伴有 ID 的癫痫患者中是否相关。

方法

对 2759 例 DEEs 患者或假定具有单基因基础的伴 ID 的癫痫患者以及 447760 名人群匹配的对照者的遗传数据进行了分析。我们比较了病例组和对照组之间“所有癫痫”、“局灶性癫痫”和“遗传全面性癫痫”(GGE)的 PRS。我们对有或没有可识别的有害遗传变异的病例进行了分层,并进行了病例和对照组之间的两两比较。

结果

假定的单基因严重癫痫病例的“所有癫痫”(p<0.0001)、“局灶性癫痫”(p<0.0001)和“GGE”(p=0.0002)PRS 升高,可解释表型变异的 0.08%至 3.3%。在有或没有主要效应的已知有害变异的病例中,PRS 均升高,两组之间的 PRS 无显著差异。

结论

我们提供了证据表明,常见的遗传变异有助于 DEEs 和其他伴有 ID 的癫痫形式的发病机制,即使存在主要效应的已知致病性变异也是如此。这些结果提供了对严重癫痫遗传基础的深入了解,并需要改变我们对 DEEs 病因的理解,即作为复杂而非单基因疾病。

资金

科学基金会爱尔兰,人类基因组研究所;美国国家心脏、肺和血液研究所;德国研究基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ce/9188960/3b0b5ad31ffe/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验