Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156513. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156513. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
Heavily modified headwater streams and open ditches carry high nitrogen loads from agricultural soils that sustain eutrophication and poor water quality in downstream aquatic ecosystems. To remediate agricultural streams and reduce the export of nitrate (NO), phosphorus and suspended sediments, two-stage ditches with constructed floodplains can be implemented as countermeasures. By extending hydrological connectivity between the stream channel and riparian corridor within constructed floodplains, these remediated ditches enhance the removal of NO via the microbial denitrification process. Ten remediated ditches were paired with upstream trapezoidal ditches in Sweden across different soils and land uses to measure the capacity for denitrification and nitrous oxide (NO) production and yields under denitrifying conditions in stream and floodplain sediments. To examine the controls for denitrification, water quality was monitored monthly and flow discharge continuously along reaches. Floodplain sediments accounted for 33 % of total denitrification capacity of remediated ditches, primarily controlled by inundation and stream NO concentrations. Despite reductions in flow-weighted NO concentrations along reaches, NO removal in remediated ditches via denitrification can be masked by inputs of NO-rich groundwaters, typical of intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Although NO production rates were 50 % lower in floodplains compared to the stream, remediated ditches emitted more NO than conventional trapezoidal ditches. Higher denitrification rates and reductions of NO proportions were predicted by catchments with loamy soils, higher proportions of agricultural land use and lower floodplain elevations. For realizing enhanced NO removal from floodplains and avoiding increased NO emissions, soil type, land use and the design of floodplains need to be considered when implementing remediated streams. Further, we stress the need for assessing the impact of stream remediation in the context of broader catchment processes, to determine the overall potential for improving water quality.
受富含氮的农业土壤影响,高度改造的源头溪流和明渠会将大量氮负荷输送到下游水生生态系统,导致水体富营养化和水质恶化。为了修复农业溪流并减少硝酸盐(NO)、磷和悬浮物的输出,可以采用具有构造洪泛区的两阶段沟渠作为对策。通过在构造洪泛区中扩展溪流通道和河岸带之间的水文连通性,这些经过修复的沟渠可以增强通过微生物反硝化过程去除 NO 的能力。在瑞典,跨越不同土壤和土地利用类型,将 10 个经过修复的沟渠与上游梯形沟渠配对,以测量在溪流和洪泛区沉积物中反硝化条件下的硝酸盐还原和氧化亚氮(NO)产生和产量的能力。为了研究反硝化作用的控制因素,每月监测水质并连续监测沿程的水流排放情况。洪泛区沉积物占修复沟渠总硝酸盐还原能力的 33%,主要受淹没和溪流 NO 浓度控制。尽管沿程水流加权 NO 浓度降低,但富含 NO 的地下水的输入可能会掩盖修复沟渠中通过反硝化作用去除的 NO,这是集约化管理农业景观的典型特征。尽管洪泛区的 NO 产生速率比溪流低 50%,但修复沟渠的排放量却比传统的梯形沟渠高。预测具有壤土、更高比例的农业用地和更低的洪泛区高程的集水区具有更高的反硝化速率和更低的 NO 比例。在实施修复后的溪流时,需要考虑土壤类型、土地利用和洪泛区的设计,以实现从洪泛区中增强的 NO 去除并避免增加的 NO 排放。此外,我们强调需要在更广泛的集水区过程背景下评估溪流修复的影响,以确定改善水质的总体潜力。