• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犯罪因果情境行动理论的实证检验:探究感知-选择过程。

An experimental test of Situational Action Theory of crime causation: Investigating the perception-choice process.

作者信息

Sattler Sebastian, van Veen Floris, Hasselhorn Fabian, Mehlkop Guido, Sauer Carsten

机构信息

Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany; Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Germany; Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Canada.

Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2022 Aug;106:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102693. Epub 2021 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102693
PMID:35680355
Abstract

Criminal action, according to Situational Action Theory (SAT), is a two-stage process consisting of a perception and a choice process. This Germany-wide vignette study (N = 3,088, participants recruited offline) provides an explicit and extensive test of these processes. It experimentally varied the informal moral context, deterrence (sanctions and detection risk), and possible gains of selling prescription drugs illegally in a 2x2x2×2 between-subject design. Personal morality and self-control were measured. Double-hurdle models show that personal morality served as a filter for the perception of criminal alternatives. Law-conforming moral context information, high self-control, and deterrence lowered the crime willingness. Thereby, this study underlines the usefulness of an explicit modeling of the dual-process of criminal conduct, in which certain antecedents only play a role in a certain process. While several findings corroborate assumptions from SAT, an influence of the informal moral context was only found in the choice process, not in the perception process.

摘要

根据情境行动理论(SAT),犯罪行为是一个由感知过程和选择过程组成的两阶段过程。这项在德国范围内开展的 vignette 研究(N = 3088,参与者通过线下招募)对这些过程进行了明确且广泛的测试。它在一个 2×2×2×2 的组间设计中,通过实验改变了非正式道德背景、威慑因素(制裁和被发现的风险)以及非法销售处方药可能获得的收益。研究还测量了个人道德和自我控制能力。双障碍模型表明,个人道德作为对犯罪选择感知的一种筛选机制。符合法律的道德背景信息、高自我控制能力和威慑因素降低了犯罪意愿。因此,本研究强调了对犯罪行为双过程进行明确建模的有用性,其中某些前因仅在特定过程中起作用。虽然一些研究结果证实了情境行动理论的假设,但非正式道德背景的影响仅在选择过程中被发现,而在感知过程中未被发现。

相似文献

1
An experimental test of Situational Action Theory of crime causation: Investigating the perception-choice process.犯罪因果情境行动理论的实证检验:探究感知-选择过程。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Aug;106:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102693. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
2
An examination of the interaction between morality and self-control in offending: A study of differences between girls and boys.犯罪中道德与自我控制之间的相互作用研究:一项关于女孩与男孩差异的研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2018 Jun;28(3):282-294. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2065. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Moral typecasting underlies punitive responses to crime.道德定型是对犯罪的惩罚性反应的基础。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Dec;40(6):697-706. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000210. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
The role of substance use and morality in violent crime - a qualitative study among imprisoned individuals in opioid maintenance treatment.物质使用与道德在暴力犯罪中的作用——一项针对接受阿片类药物维持治疗的在押人员的定性研究
Harm Reduct J. 2014 Aug 20;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-24.
5
The Combined Roles of Moral Emotion and Moral Rules in Explaining Acts of Violence Using a Situational Action Theory Perspective.从情境行动理论视角看道德情感和道德规则在解释暴力行为中的综合作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8715-8740. doi: 10.1177/0886260519852634. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
6
Proactive Criminal Thinking and Restrictive Deterrence: A Pathway to Future Offending and Sanction Avoidance.前瞻性犯罪思维与限制威慑:通向未来犯罪与避免制裁的途径。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;19(18):11636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811636.
7
For whom does deterrence affect behavior? Identifying key individual differences.威慑行为会影响谁的行为?识别关键的个体差异。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):354-360. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000246. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Bullying and defending behavior: The role of explicit and implicit moral cognition.欺凌与防御行为:显性与隐性道德认知的作用
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Dec;59:67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Comparing and contrasting the formal and informal crime control views of Indian and U.S. College students: a preliminary study.比较和对比印度与美国大学生对正式和非正式犯罪控制的看法:一项初步研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 Dec;56(8):1239-57. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11421129. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
Explanatory limitations of cognitive-developmental approaches to morality.认知发展道德观方法的解释局限性。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Jul;113(3):672-5. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.672.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Internal and External Control Factors Affect Cyberbullying? Partial Test of Situational Action Theory.内部和外部控制因素如何影响网络欺凌?情境行动理论的部分检验
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;15(7):837. doi: 10.3390/bs15070837.
2
Cooperative behavior in the workplace: Empirical evidence from the agent-deed-consequences model of moral judgment.职场中的合作行为:来自道德判断的行为主体—行为—后果模型的实证证据
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1064442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1064442. eCollection 2022.